I99pema

File:Hästskopalatset.JPG

Tack. Snyggt jobb. Jag laddade upp den filen innan jag lärt mig hur man fixade till perspektivet.--Ankara (talk) 21:49, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Velbekomme. Jag har själv ganska nyss lärt mig hur det skall göras och går igenom många av mina gamla bilder. I99pema (talk) 07:18, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Irlands ambassad.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:21, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Basområden

Vad sägs om en ytterligare uppdelning typ category:Buildings in Lärkstaden (basområde)? /Urbourbo (talk) 15:13, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Hehe, jag var just på väg att göra det när jag fick ditt meddelande. --I99pema (talk) 15:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

:-) /Urbourbo (talk) 15:23, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

You are doing...

...a lot of great work categorizing. Thank you! SergeWoodzing (talk) 23:18, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks :) --I99pema (talk) 06:48, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Ljusreklam_Stureplan_2010.ogg

File:Ljusreklam_Stureplan_2010.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hydrox (talk) 03:23, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Skeppsbron,_Göteborg.jpg

Tack för att du tillför kategorier och beskrivningar till bilderna. Jag tror dock att det blev fel när det gäller Skeppsbron, det högra huset (känt som Merkuriushuset) är enligt allt vad jag kan hitta uppfört 1897 och ritat av E Kruger. Hertziahuset verkar ha adressen Packhusplatsen 2 och vara en ståtligare historia.--Ankara (talk) 17:16, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Ah! Jag förväxlade dem och du har helt rätt. Jag ändrade namnet till Ernst Krüger som ritat flera intressanta byggnader i Göteborg.

Ja hela familjen (bröderna Ernst, George och fadern August Krüger) verkar värda egna artiklar. Jag började lite med deras firma (som fortfarande finns kvar!) sv:AKOS Arkitekter & Ingenjörer.--Ankara (talk) 18:28, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Sturegatan 36.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:57, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

File:R0043460.jpg

Hej. Du har rätt i din kritik och tack för att du ändrade 300 av mina bilder. Jag ska försöka sätta mig i arbete och göra de ändringar som behövs. Det kommer att ta tid men jag lovar om att jag ska jobba på. Till min försvar, kan jag ändå säga om att jag lurades av att andra hade laddat bilder utan relevant titel. Jag försökte även skapa kategorier själv på engelska med jag fick uppmaningen om att låta ”experterna” skapa nya kategorier/underkategorier, om jag inte vet hur man gör. Jag är ny i Wikimedia så jag missade visa saker i början t.x beskrivande titeln och kategorierna. Jag bättrade mig i efterhand och jag ska bättra mig ytterligare. Däremot tycker jag att du har fel i din kritik angående File:R0043460.jpg som du finner irelevant för projektet. Bilden är en del av Mikaelskapellets interiör, i hallen och i trapphuset, innan man kommer in i kyrkorummet, så visst har det med projektet att göra, eller? Som sagt…Tack ännu en gång, inte minst för att din kritik kan göra mig bättre på Wikimedia i det gemensamma engagemanget där vi alla ändå deltar frivilligt.

Hej. Ja det är mycket att hålla reda på till en början och det tar ett tag innan man få kläm på allt, själv tog det ett tag innan jag förstod hur kategorierna fungerade. Dra dig inte för att fråga om det är något du undrar över.

Angående min kritik av vissa av dina bilder som irrelevanta för projektet: Jag utgår från projektscopet Commons:PS#Must_be_realistically_useful_for_an_educational_purpose. Jag ser inte vad syftet med bilden till höger är, och vad den skulle bidraga/platsa i exempelvis en wikipediaartikel. Det finns naturligtvis andra motiv i Mikaelskapellet som är långt mer centrala än en modern armatur i ett relativt nyrenoverat trapphus. I projektets syfte ingår som jag ser det inte att fotografera alla detaljer i en byggnad. Om Wikimedia fylls med liknande material så blir det istället svårare att hitta de centrala motiven i mängden. --I99pema (talk) 17:39, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Hej. Det är möjligt att jag missade att denna armatur är irrelevant för projektet. Mina kunskaper angående antika föremål är minst sagt begränsade.:-) Angående redigeringen av bilderna och ändringarna av namn och kategori, behöver jag verkligen hjälp. Det är rena djungel med alla regler och koderna. Finns det någon "redigerings info för dummies" och någon sätt för "batch" -ändringar ? Och en fråga till: Jag har många bilder från "Christian Erikssons bostad och ateljé Stockholms kn, Nederland mindre 9" som ska börja ladda upp nu.Runt om på gården och t.o.m på vägarna och husfasaden fanns skulpturer både av Cristian Eriksson och hans son skulptören Liss Eriksson. Blir det problem med konstobjektens rättigheter om skulpturerna syns på bild? Tack på förhand.

För att vara säker på att min poäng går fram: Istället för att ladda upp 100 bilder i batch på ett objekt så anser jag att det är det bättre att välja ut 10 av de bästa vilka är centrala för objektet eller extra intressanta av annan anledning och lägga lite tid på kategorisering, beskrivning och bildbehandling (exempelvis räta upp linjer så att inte husväggar lutar inåt, sneda horisonter och underexponeringar). Då får man 10 riktigt bra bilder som folk hittar och känner sig lockade av att sätta in i diverse artiklar, istället för en djungel av halvdassiga bilder som snabbt kommer bytas ut till bättre.

Under Mina Inställningar längst upp på sidan finns Verktyg för kategorier. Här kan du aktivera Cat-a-lot och HotCat. Dessa är bra att ha vid kategorisering (dokumentation om funktion finns där), men det bästa är att lägga till kategorin redan vid uppladdning. Jag lyckades av någon anledning inte använda Hot-cat på dina bilder, utan ändrade manuellt en efter en med cat-a-lot

För att hitta redan skapade kategorier och deras namn kan du söka eller gå till Category:Buildings in Stockholm by borough och därifrån klicka dig fram till de olika stadsdelarna. Jag har för mig att alla byggnadsminnen redan har en kategori. Annars kan du alltid gå till sv:Lista över byggnadsminnen i Stockholms län och klicka på bilden och se hur den är kategoriserad.

Jag ser fram emot dina från ateljén. Jag kan skriva ihop en artikel senare på svwp. Något problem med upphovsrätt för Ch. Eriksson föreligger inte. Jag tror inte heller det skall vara problem med Liss Erikssons om de är placerade ute och publikt. En kategori finns på Category:Nederlandet mindre 9.

--I99pema (talk) 18:32, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Hej igen. Nu har jag kladdat klart "Christian Erikssons bostad och ateljé". De sista bilderna har placerats i rätt kategori "Nederlandet mindre 9". Jag ser fram emot att läsa din artikel!! Dina bilder är av fantastisk kvalitè!!! Nu förstår jag din resonemang om färre bilder och bättre kvalité. Tack för redigeringstipset. Jag lovar att jag ska kämpa att ändra på mina uppladdningar, det blir inte lätt men jag ska göra det! Jag har flera bilder av Christian Erikssons ateljé som i övrigt är stängt för allmänheten men jag hade tur!:-) Säg till om du vill ha resten av bilderna. Må så gott!

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, I99pema!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 15:04, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Wermlands enskilda.jpg was uncategorized on 11 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:04, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear I99pema, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:16, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Anna Sandströms skola, slöjdlektion.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:08, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Sagerska huset

Hej,

Trevligt med de nya fina bilderna på Sagerska huset. Jag ladda upp en beskuren variant av en av bilderna File:Sagersha huset 2012 - h (crop).jpg och gjorde i samband med det några justeringar av orginalbilden och laddade upp en ny version av den File:Sagersha huset 2012 - h.JPG. Återställ gärna om du misstycker.

God fortsättning på det nya året!

--ArildV (talk) 18:29, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Fint! Bytte bild i artikeln till den. Tackar och God fortsättning! --I99pema (talk) 18:41, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Norra Real 2011 .JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Norra Real 2011 .JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 21:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Norra Real, slutsten.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Norra Real, slutsten.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 04:46, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Fröken Pardon.jpg

File:Fröken Pardon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 08:14, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Villa Tallbacken, ritning.jpg

File:Villa Tallbacken, ritning.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 10:04, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Erik Alfred Hedin

Jag hade missat att du både skapat artikeln och kategori för Erik Alfred Hedin. Kul! Jag lade till hans egna bostad i Gävle i kategorin, Buregården. Fascinerande byggnad--ArildV (talk) 21:43, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Kul. Jag lade till den i artikeln --I99pema (talk) 07:56, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Gustaf Fjæstad1.jpg

File:Gustaf Fjæstad1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Coat of Many Colours (talk) 20:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi I99pema, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

File:TureHagelbergKvinnoportratt.jpg, File:TureHagelbergSkeppsbron.jpg, File:TureHagelbergJotunheimen.jpg

De här bilderna är tagna av mig, David Krantz på tavlor som min morfar målat. Det är samtliga ägare till upphovsrätten på målningarna som bett mig lägga upp bilderna på wikimedia. De är också så vitt jag vet märkta att de kan användas fritt i den här formen, om inte så är tanken att de ska vara det. --DK538 (talk) 20:30, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Hej David. Så bra då skall de ju inte raderas. Jag tror det är nödvändigt att det läggs till en OTRS på dessa bilder för att klargöra att ägarna till upphovsrätten gett sitt medgivande att du laddat upp verken (om jag förstått det riktigt så är det inte du själv som besitter denna rätt?). Kolla här: Commons:OTRS/sv - vad du behöver göra är att maila deras tillstånd till info-sv@wikimedia.org så kommer bilderna märkas upp på samma sätt som exempelvis denna File:Gärdesfesten 1971.jpg --I99pema (talk) 20:44, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Hej. Jag kan be min mor som äger upphovsrätten att göra något från sitt konto, d.v.s. Ekr commons om det är enklare än att gå OTRS-vägen. --DK538 (talk) 20:55, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

På något sätt måste det förtydligas, annars lär folk även i framtiden märka upp den för radering. OTRS är enligt mig en tydlig och beständig markering, men det finns kanske andra sätt att ordna det på. --I99pema (talk) 21:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Använt din bild.

Hej.

Jag tänkte bara få tala om att jag har använt ditt foto (file:Malmskillnadsgatan 2010.JPG) till en affisch. /Dcastor (talk) 01:19, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Kul. Snyggt det blev! --I99pema (talk) 11:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Licens

Oj! Missade att jag inte var uppladdaren. Har laddat upp de flesta bilderna av Östermalmsfängeslet, dock upptäckte jag att jag använt fel licens, så jag gjorde en drive igår. Din kom med av bara farten. Har tagit tillbaka min redigering nu. Kaiketsu (talk) 13:42, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

OK, då är jag med! --I99pema (talk) 07:50, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Fel filnamn

Hej

Jag har klantat till det lite med vädersträcken så fem filer har felaktiga namn. Är det något du kan flytta eller hitta på bättre namn.

• VästrakorridorenMic.JPG skall heta ÖstrakorridorenMic.JPG
• Norra entren MIC1.JPG skall heta Västra entren MIC.JPG
• Västra entren MIC.JPG skall heta Östra entren MIC.JPG
• Östra entren MIC.JPG skall heta Norra entren MIC.JPG
• Östra entren MIC2.JPG skall heta Norra entren MIC2.JPG

Janne. Janee (talk) 21:52, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Hej! De är nu flyttade till rätt väderstreck. --I99pema (talk) 04:21, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Hej igen! Nu har jag klantat till det igen (är en riktig slarver) filen som jag döpt till FdHuvudförrådI2a.JPG är inte Huvudförrådet utan FdFörvaltningsbyggnaden. Kan du byta namn på filen. Dessutom har jag gjort fel i namgivningen av "Ctec Karlstad" som råkade få namnet RäddningstjKhamn5.JPG, samt ett hus på Kaserhöjden som jag gav namnet Underoffbostaden I2.JPG vilket visade sig vara fel, vilket hus det är vet jag i skrivande stund inte, men skall kolla upp det under helgen. Janne Janee (talk) 18:10, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Hej. Jag har nu flyttat RäddningstjKhamn5.JPG. När det gäller förvaltningsbyggnaden - är det verkligen Image:FdHuvudförrådI2a.JPG som skall flyttas och inte Image:FdHuvudförrådI2b.JPG? I annat fall borde väl även Image:FdHuvudförrådI2c.JPG flyttas? --I99pema (talk) 04:54, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Tack för flytten av Ctec Karlstad. Hoppas att jag skriver rätt nu, men så här bör det vara Image:FdHuvudförrådI2b.JPG skall vara förvaltningsbyggnaden, de två andra filerna xxxI2c och xxxI2a visar båda Huvudförrådet med sin varulyft på gavlarnas andra våning. Janee (talk) 18:39, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Fixat --I99pema (talk) 05:41, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Valkampanj för SD, EU-valet 2014.JPG

File:Valkampanj för SD, EU-valet 2014.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 12:09, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Liljan 32, 2014.JPG

Hej! Enligt länken till BBR finns inga aktuella lagskydd registrerade för Liljan 32. --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Fixat. Det är tyvärr fortfarande felaktig parameter i många av mina äldre uppladdningar. Har lagt till |2=b|type=A| nu.--I99pema (talk) 12:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Jaha, då vet jag hur man gör. Har nu även fixat denna File:Apoteket Mården.JPG. --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 17:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Tack --I99pema (talk) 18:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Espresso house.JPG

Hej, jag har raderingsanmält bilden File:Espresso house.JPG som du tagit. Jag tror inte logotypen är såpass trivial att den går att göra tillgänglig under en fri licens utan upphovsrättsinnehavarens medgivande. /NH 12:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Hej. Du har nog rätt. Jag har nu beskurit bilden så att loggan inte är tydlig. Det borde väl funka? --I99pema (talk) 12:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Espresso house.JPG

File:Espresso house.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 14:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

"People By Name" categories feedback

Hi! May I ask you to add defaultsort when creating categories for people? They should almost always be sorted by last name, with the exception of icelandic people who should be sorted by first name. You could also add birth year categories and a link to wikidata to make the categories more complete. I noticed you have created many categories for architects without these traits. Wikiregards, --Vogler (talk) 23:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Vogler. I see the great work you are doing in the category, and I will definitely follow your examples in the future--I99pema (talk) 07:47, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Barbara Bergström.png

File:Barbara Bergström.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lymantria (talk) 06:24, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Kungsgatan, Lysekil 01.jpg

Ooops! Den slank med av misstag. Jag ber så mycket om ursäkt. --Cart (talk) 09:12, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Antog det. Ingen fara 🙂I99pema (talk) 09:19, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Message ?

Hi I99pema. I have received notification that you have sent me a message. I can not find it. Bengt Nyman (talk) 20:44, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Hej Bengt. Jag gissar att det där den här återställningen av din användarsida som genererat meddelandet. I99pema (talk) 05:06, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

File:Karl Harald Ossian Ericson.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:04, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Uggelviksgatan

Det är en stor röra gällande Uggelviksgatan, namnen under bilderna, bilderna behöver flyttas och categori-namnen behöver ändras, har ansökt om fileremover men blev avslagen eftersom jag endast hade 200 edits, ska fixa till det, ville bara informerar dig om det. Mvh Ljuvlig (talk) 07:06, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Fråga är om man inte skall passa på att döpa om kategorierna till fastighetsbeteckningarna snarare än adresser, som i fallet hörnhastigheter ibland ändå inte täcker byggnadens alla adresser. Inom Projekt Stockholm har namngivning enligt fastighetsbeteckning blivit mer eller mindre praxis på senare år om byggnaden saknar ett allmänt namnI99pema (talk) 07:26, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Det låter som en bra ide enligt mig om jag förstår det rätt. Du menar alltså istället för att ha ex. "Category:Baldersgatan 2" och "Category:Östermalmsgatan 17" så skapar vi "Piplärkan 1" som både innefattar "Baldersgatan 2" och "Östermalmsgatan 17" eftersom de är i samma byggnad, alltså i Piplärkan 1? Ljuvlig (talk) 08:14, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Precis. ”Piklärkan 1” sorterar sedan under Category:Östermalmsgatan och Category:Baldersgatan --I99pema (talk) 08:21, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Det låter toppen, tycker vi kör på det. Ljuvlig (talk) 08:23, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Det blir så här eller hur? (vill bara kolla så jag har gjort rätt innan jag fortsätter): https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Pipl%C3%A4rkan_1 Mvh Ljuvlig (talk) 10:09, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Ser fint ut! Lade till några kategorier.--I99pema (talk) 12:23, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Tack I99ema, toppen! Ljuvlig (talk) 16:26, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Korrekt sätt Baldersgatan

Ja la en redirect här: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Baldersgatan_2 Är det korrekt gjort? Ljuvlig (talk) 17:35, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Toppen :-) --I99pema (talk) 17:51, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Kulturhistoriskt värde

Såg att du la till den här på Piplärkan 1:

This is a photo of a building (without protection) in Sweden, number 21420000002853 in the RAÄ buildings database.

, byggnaden är grön markerad kulturhistoriskt värde, när ska man lägga till en sån här "BBR-mall", är det för samtliga byggnader som är lila, grön och gul klassificerade? Ljuvlig (talk) 18:26, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Mallen kan användas för allt som har en post i BBR. I detta fall skall dock |type=A| läggas till (enligt ovan) för byggnader utan lagskydd. Jag kan passa på att nämna att jag nog laddat upp 100-tals bilder som saknar detta tillägg, innan jag 2014 lärde mig att denna möjlighet fanns (det var mallen från en äldre bild jag kopierade i detta fall och missade detta), och du får gärna rätta om du stöter på fler felaktiga. --I99pema (talk) 19:42, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Okej då vet jag, tack I99pema för informationen, ska försöka göra det. Ljuvlig (talk) 19:58, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Mats Hedlund.jpg

Copyright status: File:Mats Hedlund.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Mats Hedlund.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 21:41, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi I99pema,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi I99pema,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Restaurang Slottsholmen, Västervik.png

Hi I99pema

I don't think the name "Kalmar Museum" is correct. It is a county museum (Kalmar Läns Museum) and should better be named as such to avoid confusion--and for correct understanding that it is not a city museum. Thank you, Bossesbosses (talk) 12:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi I99pema,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Sayan Isaksson, kockarnas kock 2014.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sayan Isaksson, kockarnas kock 2014.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sayan Isaksson, kockarnas kock 2014.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

廣九直通車 (talk) 09:00, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Gustaf Adolf Fristedt.jpg

Copyright status: File:Gustaf Adolf Fristedt.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Gustaf Adolf Fristedt.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Arvika Sjukstuga.jpg

Copyright status: File:Arvika Sjukstuga.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Arvika Sjukstuga.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bo Möller.jpg

Copyright status: File:Bo Möller.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bo Möller.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Flerbostadshus Exteriör. ArkDes ARKM.1962-101-0930.jpg

Hej!

Ser att du jobbat kort med denna bild. Är helt enkelt nyfiken på hur du sluter dig till att bilden är tagen i Göteborgs del av Krokslätt? -- LevandeMänniska (talk), 22:43, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Hej LevandeMänniska . Det baseras helt på kvartersnamnet Ullvättern i bildtexten. Enligt denna så låg det ialllfall 1921 i Krokslätt --I99pema (talk) 08:11, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Eklandagatan 44 är addressen (går gränsen fortfarande längs denna gata?).--I99pema (talk) 09:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Tack för svaret!

Google Maps berättar att hela Eklandagatan, med stor marginal, ligger i Göteborgs kommun och att gränsen går norr om Krokslätts Parkgatan. En bra källa för kvarter och dylikt är hemsidan "Det Gamla Göteborg", som givetvis också nämner kvarteret Ullvättern [1]. -- LevandeMänniska (talk), 12:09, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Fint. Tänkte snarare gräns mellan Johanneberg och Krokslätt men det verkar ju fortfarande stämma :-) --I99pema (talk) 14:07, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Är uppväxt i Mölndal, men visste inte att stadsdelen Krokslätt sträckte sig så långt in mot centrum. Man lär sig något nytt varje dag. -- LevandeMänniska (talk), 14:23, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Röda Korsets högskola, Teknikringen.jpg

File:Röda Korsets högskola, Teknikringen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RKH18 (talk) 14:12, 4 August 2023 (UTC)