Pomakis

Image:Polynesian Cultural Centre Fiji Temple.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polynesian Cultural Centre Fiji Temple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Pko 07:21, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Your picture in Quality Images Candidates

Your picture Image:Cancun Beach.jpg is overexposed. I suggest you make a little edit and replace it as soon as possible. Alvesgaspar 18:48, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Riot police taking lunch break.jpg

There is one little thing preventing me of promoting your picture to QI: vertical lines are a little tilted to the right. Could you please fix that? - Alvesgaspar 22:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

I've received your comment regarding the fact that you don't like that the "vertical lines are a little tilted to the right" in this photo. Thanks for the feedback. I'm trying to correct this, but am finding it difficult without ruining other aesthetic aspects of the photo. For one thing, because of the side angle of the photo (which of course was intentional), there's no single plane of vertical lines. Straightening one set throws another set out of tilt. Secondly, any rotation necessitates a bit of cropping. The bottom, left and right of the photo can be cropped a bit without negative consequence, but in my opinion cropping anything from the top would cause some aesthetic destruction. Finally, any amount of rotation will cause the photo to blur a (tiny) bit. Therefore, I hesitate to replace my photo with a rotated version. I'd like your honest opinion, though, on my attempt. I have placed the rotated version on the web here for you to take a look at.

Thanks again for the feedback. --Pomakis 01:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

You are welcome. Yes, you are right, there are side effects to rotation. I think the new version is a little bit overdone, i.e., the left part of the picture is now tilted to left. The best solution is somewhere between the two version, which also means that you don't have to cropo so much. But you have an excellent picture and I think it deserves promotion anyway. Regards, Joaquim Alvesgaspar 11:39, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Quality Image

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cancun Beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

- Alvesgaspar 08:26, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Your QI

You are absolutely right, I apologize. I knew it was a QI but I was so tired last night that I didn't finish the job properly. It is fixed now. Please look at Commons:Quality images - Alvesgaspar 08:28, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Quality Image

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riot police taking lunch break.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

—JeremyA 23:19, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iguana in Mexico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Ikiwaner 07:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

File:Stuffed tiger wearing a sombrero.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stuffed tiger wearing a sombrero.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Ikiwaner 07:39, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CN Tower 2003-07-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Ikiwaner 21:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamster in hand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Ikiwaner 17:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Halifax at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Ikiwaner 18:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kinkakuji 2004-09-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Thermos 16:53, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Sumo cerimony

Concerning your image in "Quality images candidates", it seems no concensus has been reached. Maybe the best thing to do is to renominate it, with the mention that it has been improved. Alvesgaspar 12:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Two Towers Las Vegas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Joshua Tree in Arizona.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Jnpet 15:22, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunflowers in Nova Scotia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Jnpet 06:22, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grasshopper In Nova Scotia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Seafarers_Of_Catan.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Seafarers_Of_Catan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Teofilo (talk) 17:42, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Great stuff.

I looked you up because I found your hamster somewhere and really liked it, but the riot police taking a lunch break is a real treat. It is one of those pictures that show the world from a completely different angle than the one we're used to. Congratulations! --Bernardoni (talk) 03:52, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

(Thanks! -- Pomakis (talk) 14:03, 29 October 2010 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Ontario Dusk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:03, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Stuffed tiger wearing a sombrero.jpg

File:Stuffed tiger wearing a sombrero.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fæ (talk) 14:14, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Nijo_Castle

Dear Keith Pomakis, I am a Prof. in Architectureand I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nij%C5%8D_Castle#/media/File:Nijo_Castle.jpg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com --hippofish 12:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 12:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Temple Of Joy Burning Man 2002.jpg

And also:

• File:The Man At Night Burning Man 2002.jpg

Yours sincerely, Darwin ^Ahoy! 01:55, 23 September 2024 (UTC)