default search action
Google
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Internet Archive Scholar
CiteSeerX
ORCID16. ICAIL 2017: London, UK
- Jeroen Keppens, Guido Governatori:
Proceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2017, London, United Kingdom, June 12-16, 2017. ACM 2017, ISBN 978-1-4503-4891-1 - Maja Brkan:
AI-supported decision-making under the general data protection regulation. 3-8 - Cristian Cardellino
, Milagro Teruel, Laura Alonso Alemany, Serena Villata:
A low-cost, high-coverage legal named entity recognizer, classifier and linker. 9-18 - Ilias Chalkidis, Ion Androutsopoulos, Achilleas Michos:
Extracting contract elements. 19-28 - Jack G. Conrad, Khalid Al-Kofahi:
Scenario analytics: analyzing jury verdicts to evaluate legal case outcomes. 29-37 - Matteo Cristani, Francesco Olivieri, Antonino Rotolo:
Changes to temporary norms. 39-48 - Célia da Costa Pereira, Andrea G. B. Tettamanzi, Beishui Liao, Alessandra Malerba, Antonino Rotolo, Leendert W. N. van der Torre:
Combining fuzzy logic and formal argumentation for legal interpretation. 49-58 - Carlos Faciano, Sergio Mera, Fernando Schapachnik, Ana Haydée Di Iorio, Bibiana Luz Clara, Verónica Uriarte, María Fernanda Giaccaglia, María Belén Ruffa, Cristian Marcos:
Performance improvement on legal model checking. 59-68 - Norman E. Fenton, David A. Lagnado, Christian Dahlman, Martin Neil:
The opportunity prior: a simple and practical solution to the prior probability problem for legal cases. 69-76 - Matias Garcia-Constantino, Katie Atkinson, Danushka Bollegala, Karl Chapman, Frans Coenen, Claire Roberts, Katy Robson:
CLIEL: context-based information extraction from commercial law documents. 79-87 - Matthias Grabmair:
Predicting trade secret case outcomes using argument schemes and learned quantitative value effect tradeoffs. 89-98 - John Henderson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon:
Interpreting contracts using english common law rules as stated by Lord Hoffmann. 99-108 - John F. Horty:
Reasoning with dimensions and magnitudes. 109-118 - Argyro P. Karanasiou, Dimitris A. Pinotsis:
Towards a legal definition of machine intelligence: the argument for artificial personhood in the age of deep learning. 119-128 - Juliano S. A. Maranhão:
A logical architecture for dynamic legal interpretation. 129-138 - Robert Muthuri, Guido Boella, Joris Hulstijn, Sara Capecchi, Llio Humphreys:
Compliance patterns: harnessing value modeling and legal interpretation to manage regulatory conversations. 139-148 - Rohan Nanda, Luigi Di Caro, Guido Boella, Hristo Konstantinov, Tenyo Tyankov, Daniel Traykov, Hristo Hristov, Francesco Costamagna, Llio Humphreys, Livio Robaldo, Michele Romano:
A unifying similarity measure for automated identification of national implementations of european union directives. 149-158 - James O'Neill, Paul Buitelaar, Cécile Robin, Leona O'Brien:
Classifying sentential modality in legal language: a use case in financial regulations, acts and directives. 159-168 - Xavier Parent, Leendert W. N. van der Torre:
The pragmatic oddity in norm-based deontic logics. 169-178 - Silviu Pitis:
Methods for retrieving alternative contract language using a prototype. 179-187 - Ngoc Phuoc An Vo, Caroline Privault, Fabien Guillot:
Experimenting word embeddings in assisting legal review. 189-198 - Bart Verheij:
Formalizing arguments, rules and cases. 199-208 - Tom Vacek, Frank Schilder:
A sequence approach to case outcome detection. 209-215 - Vern R. Walker, Ji Hae Han, Xiang Ni, Kaneyasu Yoseda:
Semantic types for computational legal reasoning: propositional connectives and sentence roles in the veterans' claims dataset. 217-226 - Wolfgang Alschner, Dmitriy Skougarevskiy:
Towards an automated production of legal texts using recurrent neural networks. 229-232 - Matthew Dunn, Levent Sagun, Hale Sirin, Daniel Chen:
Early predictability of asylum court decisions. 233-236 - Daniel L. Chen, Jess Eagel:
Can machine learning help predict the outcome of asylum adjudications? 237-240 - Henry Prakken:
On making autonomous vehicles respect traffic law: a case study for dutch law. 241-244 - Peter Schmitz, Enrico Francesconi, Simon-Pierre Landercy, Brahim Batouche, V. Touly:
A knowledge organization system for e-participation in law-making. 245-248 - Kyoko Sugisaki:
Supertagging for domain adaptation: an approach with law texts. 249-252 - Shivam Verma, Adithya Parthasarathy, Daniel L. Chen:
The genealogy of ideology: predicting agreement and persuasive memes in the U.S. courts of appeals. 253-256 - P. Wongchaisuwat, Diego Klabjan, John O. McGinnis:
Predicting litigation likelihood and time to litigation for patents. 257-260 - Eugene Yang, David A. Grossman, Ophir Frieder, Roman Yurchak:
Effectiveness results for popular e-discovery algorithms. 261-264 - Latifa Al-Abdulkarim, Katie Atkinson, Sam Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon:
Angelic environment: demonstration. 267-268 - Zachary Bennett, Tony Russell-Rose, Kate Farmer:
A scalable approach to legal question answering. 269-270 - Matthew Gifford:
LexrideLaw: an argument based legal search engine. 271-272 - Seongwan Heo, Kihyun Hong, Young-Yik Rhim:
Legal content fusion for legal information retrieval. 277-281 - Mi-Young Kim, Randy Goebel:
Two-step cascaded textual entailment for legal bar exam question answering. 283-290
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.
last updated on 2025-01-10 18:20 CET by the dblp team
all metadata released as open data under CC0 1.0 license
see also: Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Imprint
dblp was originally created in 1993 at:
since 2018, dblp has been operated and maintained by:
the dblp computer science bibliography is funded and supported by:
