Key Points
-
We analysed the discovery strategies and the molecular mechanisms of action (MMOAs) for new molecular entities and new biologics that were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the 10-year period between 1999 and 2008.
-
Out of the total of 259 agents approved, 75 were first-in-class drugs with new MMOAs, and of these, 50 (67%) were small molecules and 25 (33%) were biologics.
-
These results show that the contribution of phenotypic screening to the discovery of first-in-class small-molecule drugs exceeded that of _target-based approaches — with 28 and 17 of these drugs coming from these two approaches, respectively — in an era in which the major focus was on _target-based approaches.
-
There were 164 follower drugs, of which 83 (51%) were discovered with _target-based approaches, 30 (18%) via phenotypic assays and 31 (19%) were biologics.
-
Many different biochemical mechanisms mediated the drug response at the _target. These included: reversible, irreversible and slow binding kinetics; competitive, uncompetitive and noncompetitive interactions between physiological substrates/ligands and drugs; and inhibition, activation, agonism, partial agonism, allosteric activation and induced degradation, among other mechanisms. We conclude that an affinity-driven 'one size fits all' approach to drug discovery does not account for the diversity of MMOAs of approved drugs.
-
We postulate that a _target-centric approach for first-in-class drugs, without consideration of an optimal MMOA, may contribute to the current high attrition rates and low productivity in pharmaceutical research and development.
-
We consider that technical risk — and, consequently, overall attrition in drug development — could be decreased for first-in-class drugs through the development and greater use of translational phenotypic assays and by considering diverse MMOAs when using a _target-based, hypothesis-driven strategy.
Abstract
Preclinical strategies that are used to identify potential drug candidates include _target-based screening, phenotypic screening, modification of natural substances and biologic-based approaches. To investigate whether some strategies have been more successful than others in the discovery of new drugs, we analysed the discovery strategies and the molecular mechanism of action (MMOA) for new molecular entities and new biologics that were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration between 1999 and 2008. Out of the 259 agents that were approved, 75 were first-in-class drugs with new MMOAs, and out of these, 50 (67%) were small molecules and 25 (33%) were biologics. The results also show that the contribution of phenotypic screening to the discovery of first-in-class small-molecule drugs exceeded that of _target-based approaches — with 28 and 17 of these drugs coming from the two approaches, respectively — in an era in which the major focus was on _target-based approaches. We postulate that a _target-centric approach for first-in-class drugs, without consideration of an optimal MMOA, may contribute to the current high attrition rates and low productivity in pharmaceutical research and development.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
We are sorry, but there is no personal subscription option available for your country.
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Munos, B. Lessons for 60 years of pharmaceutical innovation. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 8, 959–968 (2009).
Paul, S. M. et al. How to improve R.&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 203–214 (2010).
Lindsay, M. A. _target discovery. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 2, 831–838 (2003).
Imming, P., Sinning, C. Meyer A. Drugs, their _targets and the nature and number of drug _targets. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 5, 821–834 (2006).
Overington, J. P., Al-Lazikani, B. & Hopkins, A. L. How many drug _targets are there? Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 5, 993–996 (2006).
Williams, M. Systems and integrative biology as alternative guises for pharmacology: prime time for an iPharm concept? Biochem. Pharmacol. 70, 1707–1716 (2005).
Flordellis, C. S., Manolis, A. S., Paris, H. & Karabinis, A. Rethinking _target discovery in polygenic diseases. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 6, 1791–1798 (2006).
Urban, J. D. et al. Functional selectivity and classical concepts of quantitative pharmacology J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 320, 1–13 (2007). Formalizes the concept of functional selectivity, whereby multiple unique ligands can bind to one receptor to initiate different responses.
Kenakin, T. & Miller, L. J. Seven transmembrane receptors as shapeshifting proteins: the impact of allosteric modulation and functional selectivity on drug discovery. Pharmacol. Rev. 62, 265–304 (2010).
Swinney, D. C. Biochemical mechanisms of drug action: what does it take for success? Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 3, 801–808 (2004). Describes how the MMOA influences the therapeutic index and utility of a medicine and introduces biochemical efficiency as a metric to quantify this influence.
Swinney, D. C. Biochemical mechanisms of new molecular entities (NMEs) approved by United States FDA during 2001–2004: mechanisms leading to optimal efficacy and safety. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 6, 461–478 (2006).
Swinney, D. C. Applications of binding kinetics to drug discovery: translation of binding mechanism to clinically differentiated therapeutic responses. Pharm. Med. 22, 23–34 (2008).
Yun, C.H. et al. The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2070–2075 (2008). Provides an illustration of how drug resistance could be overcome through an understanding of the MMOA.
Brzozowski, A. M. et al. Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor. Nature 389, 753–758 (1997). Shows structurally how agonists and antagonists bind at the same site but with different binding modes that result in different responses.
Roth, G. J. & Majerus, P. W. The mechanism of the effect of aspirin on human platelets. I. Acetylation of a particulate fraction protein. J. Clin. Invest. 56, 624–632 (1975).
Majerus, P. W., Broze, G. J. Jr, Miletich, J. P. & Tollefsen, D. M. in Goodman & Gilman's The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. (eds Hardman, J. G. & Limbird, L. E.) 1353 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996).
Copeland, R. A., Pompliano, D. L. & Meek, T. D. Drug-_target residence time and its implications for lead optimization. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 5, 730–739 (2006).
Timmino, P. J. & Copeland, R. A. Residence time of receptor–ligand complexes and its effect on biological function. Biochemistry 47, 5481–5492 (2008).
Lu, H. & Tonge, P. J. Drug-_target residence time: critical information for lead optimization. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 14, 1–8 (2010).
Johnson, D. S., Weerapana, E. & Cravatt, B. F. Strategies for discovering and derisking covalent, irreversible enzyme inhibitors. Future Med. Chem. 2, 949–964 (2010).
Ohlson, S. Designing transient binding drugs: a new concept for drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today 13, 433–439 (2008).
Lipton, S. A. Paradigm shift in neuroprotection by NMDA receptor blockade: Memantine and beyond. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 5, 160–170 (2006).
Lipton, S. A. Pathology activated therapeutics for neuroprotection. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 8, 803–808 (2007). Describes the principle that drugs should be activated by the pathological state that they are intended to inhibit.
Changeux, J. P. Allosteric receptors: from electric organ to cognition. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 50, 1–38 (2010).
Conn, J. P., Christopoulos, A. & Lindsley, C. W. Allosteric modulators of GPCRs: a novel approach for the treatment of CNS disorders. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 8, 41–54 (2009).
Hanck, D. A. et al. Using lidocaine and benzocaine to link sodium channel molecular conformations to state-dependent antiarrhythic drug affinity. Circ. Res. 105, 492–499 (2009).
Butterworth, J. F. & Strichartz, G. R. Molecular mechanisms of local anesthesia: a review. Anesthesiology 72, 711–734 (1990).
Wilson, D. N. et al. The oxazolidinone antibiotics perturb the ribosomal peptidyl-transferase center and effect tRNA positioning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 13339–13344 (2008).
Nemeth, E. F. Misconceptions about calcimimetics. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1068, 471–476 (2006). Discusses lessons learned in the discovery of cinacalcet, with emphasis on the importance of using an understanding of physiology.
Salisbury, B. G. et al. Hypocholesterolemic activity of a novel inhibitor of cholesterol absorption, SCH 48461. Athlerosclerosis 115, 45–63 (1995).
Valentino, D. et al. A selective N-type calcium channel antagonist protects against neuronal loss after global cerebral ischemia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 7894–7897 (1993).
Newman, D. J. & Cragg, G. M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the last 25 years. J. Nat. Prod. 70, 461–477 (2007). Describes the successes of natural products as a source for new drugs.
Deacon, C. F. Therapeutic strategies based on glucagon-like peptide-1. Diabetes 53, 2181–2189 (2004).
Von Itzstein, M. et al. Rational design of potent sialidase-based inhibitors of influenza virus replication. Nature 363, 418–423 (1993).
Weibel, E. K., Hadvary, P., Hochuli, E., Kupfer, E. & Lengsfeld, H. Lipstatin, an inhibitor of pancreatic lipase produced by Streptomyces toxytricini. 1. Producing organism, fermentation, isolation and biological activity. J. Antibiot. 40, 1081–1086 (1987).
Kluter, D. J. New thrombopoietic growth factors. Blood 109, 4607–4616 (2007).
Remuzzi, G. et al. New therapeutics that antagonize endothelin: promises and frustrations. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 1, 986–1001 (2002).
Wood, J. M. et al. Structure-based design of aliskiren, a novel orally effective renin inhibitor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 308, 698–705 (2003).
Pommier, Y. et al. Integrase inhibitors to treat HIV/AIDS. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 4, 236–248 (2005).
Espeseth, A. S. et al. HIV-1 integrase inhibitors that compete with the _target DNA substrate define a unique strand transfer conformation for integrase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 11244–11249 (2000).
Lichtner, R. B. et al. Signaling-inactive epidermal growth factor receptor/ligand complexes in intact carcinoma cells by quinazoline kinase inhibitors. Cancer Res. 61, 5790–5795 (2001).
Barker, A. J. et al. Studies leading to the identification of ZD1830 (Iressa™): an orally active, selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor _targeted to the treatment of cancer. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11, 1911–1914 (2001).
Leader, B., Baca, Q. J. & Golan, D. E. Protein therapeutics: a summary and pharmacological classification. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 7, 21–39 (2008).
Wilhelm, S. et al. Discovery and development of sorafenib: a multikinase inhibitor for treating cancer. Nature Rev. Drug Discov 5, 835–844 (2006).
Goke, R. et al. Exendin-4 is a high potency agonist and truncated exendin-(9–39)-amide an antagonist at the glucagon-like peptide 1-(7–36)-amide receptor of insulin-secreting β-cells. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 19650–19655 (1993).
Alvaro, G. & Di Fabio, R. Neurokinin 1 receptor antagonists — current prospects.Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Dev. 10, 613–621 (2007).
Wijayaratne, A. L. & McDonnell, D. P. The human estrogen receptor-α is a ubiquitinated protein whose stability is affected differentially by agonists, antagonists, and selective estrogen receptor modulators. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 35684–35692 (2001).
Ferrara, N. et al. Discovery and development of bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody for treating cancer. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 3, 391–400 (2004).
Capdeville, R., Buchdunger, E., Zimmermann, J. Matter A. Glivec (ST571, imatinib), a rationally developed, _targeted anticancer drug. Nature Rev. Drug. Discov. 1, 493–502 (2002).
Wacker, D. et al. Conserved binding mode of human β2 adrenergic receptor inverse agonists and antagonist revealed by X-ray crystallography. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 11443–11445 (2010).
Lemmon, M. A. & Schlessinger, J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 141, 1117–1134 (2010).
Li, P. et al. Cytochrome c and dATP-dependent formation of Apaf-1/caspase-9 complex initiates an apoptotic protease cascade. Cell 91, 479–489.
Johnson, K. A. Role of induced fit in enzyme specificity: a molecular forward/reverse switch. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 26297–26301 (2008).
Sigoillot, F. D. & King, R. W. Vigilance and validation: keys to success in RNAi screening. ACS Chem. Biol. 6, 47–60 (2011).
Hergenrother, P. J. & Palchaudhuri, R. Transcript profiling and RNA interference as tools to identify small molecule mechanisms and therapeutic potential. ACS Chem. Biol. 6, 21–33 (2011).
Macarron, R. et al. Impact of high-throughput screening in biomedical research. Nature Rev. Drug. Discov. 10, 188–195 (2011).
Pruss, R. M. Phenotypic screening strategies for neurodegenerative diseases: a pathway to discover novel drug candidates and potential disease _targets or mechanisms. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug _targets 9, 693–700 (2010).
Bickle, M. The beautiful cell: high-content screening in drug discovery. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 398, 219–226 (2010).
Mayer, A. M. et al. The odyssey of marine pharmaceuticals: a current pipeline perspective. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 31, 255–265 (2010).
Telling, J. L. et al. The biological activity of human CD20 monoclonal antibodies is linked to unique epitopes on CD20. J. Immunol. 177, 362–371 (2006).
Anthes, J. C. et al. Biochemical characterization of desloratadine, a potent antagonist of the human histamine H1 receptor. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 449, 229–237 (2002).
Disse, B. et al. Tiotropium (Spiriva): mechanistic considerations and clinical profile in obstructive lung disease. Life Sci. 64, 457–464 (1999).
Vauquelin, G., Fierens, F. & Van Liefde, I. Long-lasting AT1 receptor binding and protection by candesartan: comparison to other biphenyl-tetrazole sartans. J. Hypertens. 24, S23–S30 (2006).
Fuchs, B. et al. Comparative pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of candesartan and losartan in man. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 52, 1075–1083 (2000).
Gustafsson, J. A. Raloxifene: magic bullet for heart and bone? Nature Med. 4, 152–153 (1998).
DiMasi, J. A. & Fadon, L. B. Competitiveness in follow-on drug R&D: a race or imitation? Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 1–5 (2011).
Gleeson, M. P., Hersey, A., Montanari, D. & Overington, J. Probing the links between in vitro potency, ADMET and physiocochemical parameters. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 197–208 (2011).
Fersht, A. Enzyme Structure and Mechanism 88–109 (W. H Freeman and Company, New York,1985).
Issa, J. P. J., Kantarjian, H. M. & Kirkpatrick, P. Azacitidine. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 4, 275–276 (2005).
Martel, R. R., Klicius, J. & Galet, S. Inhibition of immune response by rapamycin, a new antifungal antibiotic. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 55, 48–51 (1977).
Bartizal, K. et al. In vitro antifungal activities and in vivo efficacies of 1,3-β-glucan synthesis inhibitors L671,329, L646,991, tetrahydroechinocandin B, and L687,781, a papulacandin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36, 1648–1657 (1992).
Uchikawa, O. et al. Synthesis of a novel series of tricyclic indan derivatives as melatonin receptor agonists. J. Med. Chem. 45, 4222–4239 (2002).
Kenakin, T. Pharmacologic Analysis of Drug-Receptor Interaction 242–395 (Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, 1997).
Burris K. D. et al. Aripiprazole, a novel antipsychotic, is a high-affinity partial agonist at human dopamine D2 receptors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 302, 381–389 (2002).
Pulvirenti, L. & Koob, G. F. Dopamine receptor agonists, partial agonists and psychostimulant addiction. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 15, 374–379 (1994).
Coe, J. E. et al. Varenicline: an α4β2 nicotinic receptor partial agonist for smoking cessation. J. Med. Chem. 48, 3474–3477 (2005). Describes the thinking that led to a mechanism-based search for a partial agonist of nicotinic receptors.
Rickter, A. M. et al. Preliminary studies on a more effective phototoxic agent than hematoporphyrin. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 79, 1327–1332 (1987).
Hemphill, A., Mueller, J. & Esposito, M. Nitazoxanide, a broad-spectrum thiazolide anti-infective agent for the treatment of gastrointestinal infections. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 7, 953–964 (2006).
Rossignol, J. F. & Maisonneuve, H. Nitazoxanide in the treatment of Teania saginata and Hymenolepis nana infections. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 33, 511–512 (1984).
Lewis, D. A. & Lieberman, J. A. Catching up on schizophrenia: natural history and neurobiology. Neuron 28, 325–334 (2000).
Yasuda, Y. et al. 7-[3-[4-(2,3 dimethylphenyl)piperazinyl] propoxy]-2(1H)-quinolinone (OPC-4392), a presynaptic dopamine receptor agonist and postsynaptic D2 receptor antagonist. Life Sci. 42, 1941–1954 (1988).
Kikuchi, T. et al. 7-(4-[4-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)-1-piperazinyl]butyloxy)-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone (OPC-14597), a new putative antipsychotic drug with both presynaptic dopamine autoreceptor agonistic activity and postsynaptic D2 receptor antagonistic activity. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 274, 329–336 (1995).
Oshiro, Y. et al. Novel antipsychotic agents with dopamine autoreceptor agonist properties: synthesis and pharmacology of 7-[4-(4-phenyl-1-piperazinyl)butoxy]-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone derivatives. J. Med. Chem. 41, 658–667 (1998).
Inoue, T., Domae, M., Yamada, K. & Furukawa, T. Effects of the novel antipsychotic agent 7-(4-[4-(2,3-dichorophenyl)-1-piperazinyl]butyloxy)-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinoline (OPC-14597) on prolactin release from the rat anterior pituitary gland. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 277, 137–143 (1996).
Egger, G., Liang, G., Aparicio, A. & Jones, P. A. Epigenetics in human disease and prospects for epigenetic therapy. Nature 429, 457–463 (2004).
Satistowska-Schroder, E. T., Kerridge, D. & Perry, H. Echinocandin inhibition of 1,3-β-D-glucan synthase from Candida albicans. FEBS Lett. 173, 134–138 (1984).
Nishi, T. et al. Studies on 2-oxoquinoline derivatives as blood platelet aggregation inhibitors. I. Alkyl 4-(2-oxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-6-quinolyloxy)butyrates and related compounds. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 31, 798–810 (1983).
Tally, F. P. DeBruin M. F. Development of daptomycin for Gram-positive infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 46, 523–526 (2000).
Stock, C, C. & Francis, T. J. The inactivation of the virus of epidemic influenza by soaps. J. Exp. Med. 71, 661–681 (1940).
Snipes, W., Person, S., Keller, G., Taylor, W. & Keith, A. Inactivation of lipid-containing viruses by long-chain alcohols. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 11, 98–104 (1977).
Sands, J., Auperin, D. & Snipes, W. Extreme sensitivity of enveloped viruses including herpes-simplex, to long-chain unsaturated monglycerides and alcohols. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 15, 67–73 (1979).
Katz, D. H., Marcelletti, J. F., Khalil, M. H., Pope, L. E. & Katz, L. E. Antiviral activity of 1-docosanol, an inhibitor of lipid-enveloped viruses including herpes simplex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 10825–10829 (1991).
Wakeling, A. E., Dukes, M. & Bowler, J. A potent specific pure antiestrogen with clinical potential. Cancer Res. 51, 3867–3873 (1991).
Stenoien, D. L. et al. FRAP reveals that mobility of oestrogen receptor-α is ligand- and proteasome-dependent. Nature Cell Biol. 3, 15–23 (2001).
Glower, A. J., Noyer, M., Verloes, R., Gobert, J. & Wulfert, E. UCB L059, a novel anti-convulsant drug: pharmacological profile in animals. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 222, 193–203 (1992).
Shinabarger, D. Mechanism of action of the oxazolidinone antibacterial agents. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 8, 1195–1202 (1999).
Brickner, S. J. Oxazolidinone antibacterial agents. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2, 175–194 (1996).
Cuppoletti J. et al. Recombinant and native intestinal cell ClC-2 Cl− channels are activated by RU-0211. Gastroenterology 122, A538 (2002).
Cuppoletti, J. et al. SPI-0211 activates T84 cell chloride transport and recombinant human ClC-2 chloride currents. Am. J. Physiol. 287, C1173–C1183 (2004).
Peña-Münzenmayer, G. et al. Basolateral localization of native ClC-2 chloride channels in absorptive intestinal epithelial cells and basolateral sorting encoded by a CBS-2 domain di-leucine motif. J. Cell Sci. 118, 4243–4252 (2005).
Parsons, C. G., Danysz, W. & Quack, G. Memantine is a clinically well-tolerated N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist — a review of the preclinical data. Neuropharmacology 38, 735–767 (1999).
Gerzon, K. et al. The adamantyl group in medicinal agents. I. Hypoglycemic N-arylsulfonyl-N′-adamantylureas. J. Med. Chem. 6, 760–763 (1963).
Bormann, J. Memantine is a potent blocker of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor channels. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 166, 591–592 (1989).
Platt, F. M., Neises, G. R., Dwek, R. A. & Butters, T. D. N-butyldeoxynojirimycin is a novel inhibitor of glycolipid biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 8362–8365 (1994).
Pastores, G. M. & Barnett, N. L. Substrate reduction therapy: miglustat as a remedy for symptomatic patients with Gaucher disease type 1. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs. 12, 273–281 (2003).
Hu, S. et al. Pancreatic β-cell KATP channel activity and membrane-binding studies with nateglinide: a comarison with sulfonylureas and repaglinide. J. Pharmacol. Ther. 293, 444–452 (2000).
Shinkai, H. et al. N-acylphenylanalines and related compounds. A new class of oral hypoglycemic agents. J. Med. Chem. 31, 2092–2097 (1988).
Shinkai, H. et al. N-acylphenylanalines and related compounds. A new class of oral hypoglycemic agents. J. Med. Chem. 32, 1436–1441 (1989).
Parker, W. B. et al. Purine nucleoside analogues in development for the treatment of cancer. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 5, 592–596 (2004).
Rodriguez, C. O. et al. Mechanisms for T-cell selective cytotoxicity of arabinosylguanine. Blood 102, 1842–1848 (2003).
Krenitsky, T. A. et al. An enzymatic synthesis of purine-D-arabinonucleosides. Carbohydr. Res. 97, 139–146 (1981).
Lambe, C. U. et al. 2-amino-6-methoxypurine arabinoside: an agent for T-cell malignancies. Cancer Res. 55, 3352–3356 (1995).
Gandhi, V., Keating, M. J., Bate, G. & Kirkpatrick, P. Nelarabine. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 5, 17–18 (2006).
Lock, E. A. et al. From toxicological problem to therapeutic use: the discovery of the mode of action of 2-(2-nitro-4-trifluoromethylbenzoyl)-1, 3-cyclohexanedione (NTBC), its toxicology and development as a drug. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 21, 498–506 (1998).
Kavana, M. & Moran, G. R. Interaction of (4-hydroxyphenyl)pyruvate dioxygenase with the specific inhibitor 2-[2-Nitro-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzoly]-1,3-cyclohexanedione. Biochemistry 42, 10238–10245 (2003).
Brownlee, J. M., Johnson-Winters, K., Harrison, D. H. T. & Moran, G. R. Structure of the ferrous form of 4-(hydroxyphenyl)pyruvate dehydrogenase from Streptomyces avermitilis in complex with the therapeutic herbicide, NTBC. Biochemistry 43, 6370–6377 (2004).
Yanagihara, Y., Kasai, H., Kawashima, T. & Shida, T. Immunopharmacological studies on TBX, a new antiallergic drug (1). Inhibitory effects on passive cutaneous anaphylaxis in rats and guinea pigs. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 48, 91–101 (1988).
Gaffney, S. M. Ranolazine, a novel agent for chronic stable angina. Pharmacotherapy 26, 135–142 (2006).
Chaitman, B. R. et al. Anti-ischemic effects and long-term survival during ranolazine monotherapy in patients with chronic severe angina. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 43, 1375–1382 (2004).
Chaitman, B. R. et al. Effects of ranolazine with atenolol, amlodipine, or diltiazem on exercise tolerance and angina frequency in patients with severe chronic angina: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 291, 309–316 (2004).
Antzelevitch, C. et al. Electrophysiological effects of ranolazine, a novel antianginal agent with antiarrhythmic properties. Circulation 110, 904–910 (2004).
Hunt, E. Pleuromutilin antibiotics. Drugs Future 25, 1163–1168 (2000).
Jain, K. K. An assessment of rufinamide as an anti-epileptic in comparison with other drugs in clinical development. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 9, 829–840 (2000).
Rogawski, M. A. Diverse mechanisms of antiepileptic drugs in the development pipeline. Epilepsy Res. 69, 273–294 (2006).
Meltzer, S. M., Monk, B. J. & Tewari, K. S. Green tea catechins for treatment of external genital warts. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 200, 233.e1–233.e7 (2009).
Vezina, C., Kudelski, A. & Shegal, S. N. Rapamycin. (AY-22,989), a new antifungal antibiotic. I. Taxomony of the producing streptomycete and isolation of the active principle. J. Antibiot. 10, 721–726 (1975).
Richon, V. M. et al. Second generation hybrid polar compounds are potent inducers of transformed cell differentiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 5705–5708 (1996).
Marks, P. A. & Breslow, R. Dimethyl sulfoxide to vorinostat: development of this histone deacetylase inhibitor as an anticancer drug. Nature Biotech. 25, 84–90 (2007).
Masuda Y. et al. 3-Sulfamoylmethyl-1,2-benzisoxazole, a new type of anticonvulsant drug: pharmacological profile. Arzneimittelforschung 30, 477–483 (1980).
Maibaum, J. et al. Structural modification of the P2' position of 2,7-dialkyl-substituted 5(S)-amino-4(S)-hydroxy-8-phenyl-octanecarboxamides: the discovery of aliskiren, a potent non-peptide human renin inhibitor active after once daily dosing in marmosets. J. Med. Chem. 50, 4832–4844 (2007).
Goldberg, A. in Cancer Drug Discovery and Development: Proteasome Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy (ed. Adams, J.) 17–38 (Humana, Totowa, 2004).
Stein, R. L., Ma, Y. T. & Brand, S. Inhibitors of the 26s proteolytic complex and the 20s proteasome contained therein. US Patent 5,693,617 (1995).
Decaux, G., Soupart, A. & Vassart, G. Non-peptide arginine-vasopressin antagonists: the vaptans. Lancet 371, 1624–1632 (2008).
Flexner, C. HIV drug development: the next 25 years. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 6, 959–966 (2007).
Tsibris, A. M. & Kuritzkes, D. R. Chemokine antagonists as therapeutics: focus on HIV-1. Annu. Rev. Med. 58, 445–459 (2007).
Dorr, P. et al. Maraviroc (UK-427,857), a potent, orally bioavailable, and selective small-molecule inhibitor of chemokine receptor CCR5 with broad-spectrum anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49, 4721–4732 (2005).
Watson, C., Jenkinson, S., Kazmierski, W. & Kenakin, T. The CCR5 receptor-based mechanism of action of 873140, a potent allosteric noncompetitive HIV entry inhibitor. Mol. Pharmacol. 67, 1268–1282 (2005).
Pincus, G. (ed.) The Control of Fertility. 128–138 (Academic Press, New York, 1965).
Belanger, A., Philibert, D. & Teutsch, G. Regio and stereospecific synthesis of 11β-substituted 19-norsteroids. Steroids 37, 361–382 (1981).
Mahajan, D. K. & London, S. N. Mifepristone (RU486): a review. Fertil. Steril. 68, 967–976 (1997).
Raaijmakers, H. C., Versteegh, J. E. & Uitdehaag, J. C. The X-ray structure of RU486 bound to the progesterone receptor in a destabilized agonistic conformation. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 19572–19579 (2009).
Hadvary, P., Lengsfeld, H. & Wolfer, H. Inhibition of pancreatic lipase in vitro by the covalent inhibitor tetrahydrolipstatin. Biochem. J. 256, 357–361 (1988).
Hazuda, D. J. et al. Inhibitors of strand transfer that prevent integration and inhibit HIV-1 replication in cells. Science 287, 646–650 (2000).
Summa, V. et al. Discovery of raltegravir. A potent, selective orally bioavailable HIV-integrase inhibitor for the treatment of HIV-AIDS infection. J. Med. Chem. 51, 5843–5855 (2008).
Buysse, D., Bate, G. & Kirkpatrick, P. Ramelteon. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 4, 881–882 (2005).
Drucker, D. J. The biology of incretin hormones. Cell. Metab. 3, 153–165 (2006).
Cohen, H. T. & McGovern, F. J. Renal-cell carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 2477–2490 (2005).
Atkins, M. B. et al. Innovations and challenges in renal cancer: consensus statement from the first international conference. Clin. Cancer Res. 9, 6277S–6281S (2004).
Bergers, G. et al. Benefits of _targeting both pericytes and endothelial cells in the tumor vasculature with kinase inhibitors. J. Clin. Invest. 111, 1287–1295 (2003).
Mendel, D. B. et al. In vivo anti-tumor activity of SU11248, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor _targeting VEGF and PDGF receptors: determination of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship. Clin. Cancer Res. 9, 327–337 (2003).
De Clercq, E. Strategies in the design of antiviral drugs. Nature Rev. Drug Discov. 1, 13–25 (2002).
Boismare, F. et al. A homotaurine derivative reduces the voluntary intake of ethanol by rats: are cerebral GABA receptors involved? Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 21, 787–789 (1984).
Kennedy, J. C., Pottier, R. H. & Pross, D. C. Photodynamic therapy with endogenous protoporphyrin IX: basic principles and present clinical experience. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 6, 143–148 (1990).
Sima, A. A. F., Kennedy, J. C., Blakeslee, D. & Robertson, D. M. Experimental porphyric neuropathy: a preliminary report. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 8 105–114 (1981).
Choay, J. et al. Structure–activity relationship in heparin: a synthetic pentasaccharide with high affinity for antithrombin III and eliciting high anti-factor Xa activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 116, 492–499 (1983).
Hirsh, J. et al. Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin: mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing, monitoring, efficacy, and safety. Chest 119, 64S–94S (2001).
Walenga, J. M. et al. Development of a synthetic heparin pentasaccharide: fondaparinux. Turk. J. Haematol. 19, 137–150 (2002).
Blau, N. & Erlandsen, H. The metabolic and molecular bases of tetrahydrobiopterin-responsive phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency. Mol. Genet. Metab. 82, 101–111 (2004).
Niederwieser, A. & Curtius, H. C. in Inherited Diseases of Amino Acid Metabolism (eds Bickel, H. & Wachtel, U.) 104–121 (Georg Thieme, Stuttgart, 1985).
Kure, S. et al. Tetrahydrobiopterin-responsive phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency. J. Pediatr. 135, 375–378 (1999).
Muntau, A. C. et al. Tetrahydrobiopterin as an alternative treatment for mild phenylketonuria. N. Engl. J. Med. 347, 2122–2132 (2002).
Mellish, K. J. & Brown, S. B. Verteporfin: a milestone in ophthalmology and photodynamic therapy. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2, 351–361 (2001).
Acknowledgements
We wish to acknowledge the employees of Roche (Palo Alto) who created a great environment to do drug discovery research. We specifically thank the members of the Biochemical Pharmacology Core led by A. Ford and the Virology Disease Biology Area led by N. Cammack for their support and encouragement. D.C.S. also wishes to thank the many scientists whose feedback, constructive criticism and desire to discover new medicines helped to provide the motivation for this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
David Swinney started this work while he was an employee of Roche Palto Alto, and is currently the CEO and co-founder of the Institute for Rare and Neglected Diseases Drug Discovery.
Jason Anthony declares no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information (Table S1)
Set of drugs analysed (XLS 81 kb)
Supplementary Information (Box S2)
Discovery of first-in-class medicines 1999-2008 (PDF 488 kb)
Related links
Glossary
- New molecular entities
-
(NME). A medication containing an active ingredient that has not been previously approved for marketing in any form in the United States.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Swinney, D., Anthony, J. How were new medicines discovered?. Nat Rev Drug Discov 10, 507–519 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3480
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3480
This article is cited by
-
Protein _target similarity is positive predictor of in vitro antipathogenic activity: a drug repurposing strategy for Plasmodium falciparum
Journal of Cheminformatics (2024)
-
Novel, thalidomide-like, non-cereblon binding drug tetrafluorobornylphthalimide mitigates inflammation and brain injury
Journal of Biomedical Science (2023)
-
Refined high-content imaging-based phenotypic drug screening in zebrafish xenografts
npj Precision Oncology (2023)
-
Computer vision meets microfluidics: a label-free method for high-throughput cell analysis
Microsystems & Nanoengineering (2023)
-
Electrical impedance myography detects age-related skeletal muscle atrophy in adult zebrafish
Scientific Reports (2023)
