Next Article in Journal
Utilizing Inertial Measurement Units for Detecting Dynamic Stability Variations in a Multi-Condition Gait Experiment
Previous Article in Journal
Framework for Microdosing Odors in Virtual Reality for Psychophysiological Stress Training
Previous Article in Special Issue
Complementary Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor-Based Magnetic and Optical Sensors for Life Science Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 24
Issue 21
10.3390/s24217042
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Novel Applications in Controlled Drug Delivery Systems by Integrating Osmotic Pumps and Magnetic Nanoparticles

by
David Navarro-Tumar
,
Belén García-Merino
,
Cristina González-Fernández
,
Inmaculada Ortiz
,
Ma.-Fresnedo San-Román
and
Eugenio Bringas
*
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, ETSIIT, University of Cantabria, Avda. de los Castros, s/n, 39005 Santander, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2024, 24(21), 7042; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24217042
Submission received: 12 September 2024 / Revised: 24 October 2024 / Accepted: 29 October 2024 / Published: 31 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Magnetic and Optical Sensors for Healthcare, Medical, and Bioscience Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The alarming rise in chronic diseases worldwide highlights the urgent need to overcome the limitations of conventional drug delivery systems. In this context, osmotic pumps are able to release drugs by differential osmotic pressure, achieving a controlled rate independent of physiological factors and reducing the dosing frequency. As osmotic pumps are based on the phenomenon of osmosis, the choice of high osmolality draw solutions (DSs) is a critical factor in the successful delivery of the _target drug. Therefore, one alternative that has received particular attention is the formulation of DSs with magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) due to their easy recovery, negligible reverse solute flux (RSF), and their possible tailor-made functionalization to generate high osmotic gradients. In this work, the possible integration of DSs formulated with MNPs in controlled drug delivery systems is discussed for the first time. In particular, the main potential advantages that these novel medical devices could offer, including improved scalability, regeneration, reliability, and enhanced drug delivery performance, are provided and discussed. Thus, the results of this review may demonstrate the potential of MNPs as osmotic agents, which could be useful for advancing the design of osmotic pump-based drug delivery systems.

1. Introduction

Noncommunicable or chronic diseases (NCDs) are long-term conditions caused by a variety of genetic, physiological, environmental, and behavioural factors. These include cardio-vascular and chronic respiratory diseases, cancer, and diabetes [1]. It is estimated that deaths from NCDs have reached 40 million each year, accounting for 74% of all deaths worldwide [1,2]. These are mostly in low-income countries. Without immediate action, NCD-related deaths are expected to reach 86% of the projected 90 million deaths per year by 2050 [3]. The global health crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the urgent need to improve access to NCD treatments [2]. In the context of this health crisis, a significant proportion of the population faced challenges in accessing essential medicines for the treatment of NCDs, resulting in treatment interruptions and serious health consequences for patients [4]. In accordance with _target 3.4 of Sustainable Development Goal 3 “Health and well-being” of the 2030 Agenda, which states that “By 2030, reduce premature mortality from noncommunicable diseases by one-third through prevention and treatment, and promote mental health and well-being” [5], there is an urgent need for concerted efforts to develop more effective and affordable treatments to reduce mortality. One potential strategy to address the increasing number of deaths associated with NCDs is the development of novel medical technologies and robust devices to make necessary treatments cost-effective and feasible with a minimal drug administration frequency, and to ensure easier access and adherence to treatment, particularly for patients in the most vulnerable settings [6,7,8].
In this context, conventional drug delivery systems are unable to effectively regulate the release of drugs at the _target site [9]. This results in suboptimal drug concentrations in the plasma, which can lead to treatment failure and the potential for adverse effects [10]. In contrast, controlled drug delivery systems, such as osmotic pumps, have been reported to fit to zero-order kinetics with independence of external factors, such as the gastric pH, food, and hydrodynamic conditions [11]. These maintain adequate plasma concentrations and enhance patient adherence to treatment by minimizing the dosing frequency [12]. Consequently, controlled drug delivery systems overcome the limitations of conventional drug delivery methods and have significant potential to improve the treatment of NCDs.
Drug delivery systems based on osmotic pumps are based on the osmosis phenomenon, known as forward osmosis (FO), where the release of drugs is triggered by a trans-membranal pressure difference between two fluids, a feed solution (FS), and a high osmolality draw solution (DS) [13,14]. FO is considered a promising membrane process due to its simple operation, low membrane fouling, and low energy consumption, as it is based on the difference in chemical potential across both sides of the membrane. FO has primarily been applied to seawater desalination, sewage reclamation, and industrial wastewater treatment, addressing the pressing issue of freshwater scarcity [15,16,17]. However, this technology also has potential for various applications, such as food processing, power generation [18], and drug delivery systems [19]. One significant drawback of FO is the energy cost associated with the DS regeneration stage. This makes the overall process unfeasible [13,20]. To overcome this obstacle, the use of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) to formulate the DS has received special interest since their superparamagnetic properties can be induced by an external magnetic field, significantly reducing the cost of the regeneration step [13,14]. The advantages of their superparamagnetic properties have been leveraged in several biomedical applications, including _targeted drug delivery and the extraction of biomolecules [21,22,23]. Additionally, MNPs have been used in sample preparation as a preconcentration method for biomarkers of interest from biological fluids, enhancing the analytical signal and eliminating potential interferences [23,24]. In this regard, FO can also be used as continuous preconcentration method for biologically relevant biomolecules before sensing, bringing the analytes into the detection range of the sensors and improving detection, regardless of the sensing modality [25]. The reported benefits of MNPs and osmotic pumps lead to their integration in the development of novel drug delivery systems with excellent performance. Regarding this issue, MNPs have already been integrated into osmotic pumps in previous studies. Zaher et al., in 2015, integrated magnetic nanocomposite membranes composed of MNPs and thermoresponsive polymers such as poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) into osmotic pumps for drug delivery. These membranes can be magnetically triggered by an external magnetic field, functioning as a switchable on-demand valve. The magnetic triggering increases the porosity of the membrane, resulting in a desired change in the drug release profile [26].
Despite the considerable potential offered by integrating MNPs and osmotic pumps, to the best of our knowledge, there are still no studies that have explored the use of MNPs as DSs in osmotic pumps for the development of novel medical devices for drug delivery. The objective of this review is to establish the foundation and propose, for the first time in the literature, an approach for the creation of novel drug delivery devices based on osmotic pumps. This combination could offer a number of attractive advantages, including controlled drug delivery systems with higher reusability and the elimination of the need for batteries. The precision of drug release rates in osmotic pumps can be enhanced by the integration of MNPs, which maintain the osmotic pressure difference due to their low RSF. Additionally, the possibility of delivering more than one drug simultaneously and the inclusion of stimuli-responsive materials, such as superparamagnetic materials, would contribute to the advancement of even more personalized treatments for patients. The potential advantages of the proposed systems could contribute to the development of novel, effective, and cheaper drug delivery devices and more personalized treatments for NCDs, improving healthcare worldwide. This would have significant impacts in low-income countries by facilitating access to continuous and specific treatments for NCDs through these systems. Therefore, this study represents a significant advancement of the state-of-the-art and contributes to the continuous improvement of currently available medical devices in order to address the current global health challenges.

2. Osmotic Pumps

An osmotic pump for drug delivery is based on a system that is capable of releasing a drug from a reservoir at a constant rate. This is achieved by means of the osmotic pressure difference between the osmotic agent and the interstitial fluids of the patient [19]. The osmotic pump is composed of a core that stores the osmotic agent and the drug, whether in liquid or solid state, surrounded by an external semipermeable membrane with an orifice for its release. Consequently, the water flux into the device increases the volume of the osmotic agent reservoir, thereby releasing the drug through the delivery office [27]. In certain instances, if the drug is highly soluble in water, the utilization of an additional osmotic agent may be unnecessary, as the drug itself is capable of generating sufficient osmotic pressure for its delivery [11]. Consequently, the delivery of drugs in osmotic pumps is independent of physiological factors, but is influenced by a number of factors, including the solubility of the drug, the size of the delivery orifice, the osmotic pressure in the core, and the type, surface area, and thickness of the semipermeable membrane [9,27].
These drug delivery systems can be employed for both oral treatment and subcutaneous implantation, encompassing a range of systems, including elementary osmotic pumps (EOPs), push–pull osmotic pumps (PPOPs), controlled porosity osmotic pumps (CPOPs), Rose–Nelson pumps (RNPs), Higuchi–Leeper pumps (HLPs), and Higuchi–Theeuwes pumps (HTPs) [9]. For further details about osmotic pumps, including information about their composition or details about other types of osmotic pumps, such as the RNP, HLP or HTP, readers are directed to the excellent reviews published by Patel et al. in 2021 and by Almoshari in 2022 [28,29]. Figure 1 presents a schematic diagram of an EOP.
In recent years, studies have been conducted with the objective of improving oral osmotic pumps, with a particular focus on the EOPs, PPOPs, and CPOPs. In particular, the EOPs represent the simplest and earliest form of osmotic pump used in humans [11,30]. This drug delivery system represents a simplified version of the HTP, which was originally developed for the controlled release of water-soluble drugs [30,31]. As illustrated in Figure 1, an EOP comprises a core containing the drug with an osmotic agent, or without it if the drug itself is capable of generating sufficient osmotic pressure for its delivery. The aforementioned core is then covered by a semipermeable membrane, typically cellulose acetate, which is subsequently drilled with a delivery orifice [11,30]. Thus, when the osmotic pump comes in contact with an aqueous environment, the osmotic pressure difference generated by the osmotic agent causes water to pass through the semipermeable membrane, thus increasing the volume inside the EOP. Consequently, this leads to an increase in hydrostatic pressure inside the EOP, resulting in the release of the drug through the delivery orifice [30]. Despite its advantages, there are aspects of EOPs that require improvement. These include the complexity of the preparation methods, the use of drilling and laser techniques to prepare the delivery orifice, and the enlargement of the delivery orifice during drug release [32].
PPOPs were initially developed for the delivery of insoluble drugs [31]. As depicted in Figure 2, PPOPs comprise two compartments: a push layer, comprising a swellable polymer with an osmotic agent, and an active drug compartment with a delivery orifice. The entire core is covered by a semipermeable membrane. During use, water enters both compartments, resulting in the expansion of the polymer layer and pumping of the drug solution, either dissolved or in suspension, outside the osmotic pump through the delivery orifice [10,33]. This type of osmotic pump has a higher cost compared to other types of extended drug release systems [33].
Finally, as illustrated in Figure 3, a CPOP is comprised of a core containing the drug and the osmotic agent. The aforementioned core is then covered by a semipermeable membrane with an asymmetric structure, as described in detail in reference Akhtar et al. in 2022 [9]. As opposed to other osmotic pumps, CPOPs do not have a delivery orifice for drug release. In contrast, the membrane contains water-soluble pore-forming agents [9]. Upon contact with water, the pore-forming agents present in the membrane undergo dissolution, resulting in the formation of pores. Consequently, the drug is released through the microporous membrane [34], either in solution or suspension [32]. Therefore, the mechanism of drug release is contingent upon the hydrostatic pressure and the formation of pores in the membrane. Furthermore, CPOPs offer a distinct advantage since they do not require laser drilling, which simplifies the manufacturing process [34].
Commercial osmotic pumps, such as ALZET® (Durect Corporation, Cupertino, CA, USA), are based on the HTP [35], as shown in Figure 4. They are the most commonly used osmotic pumps for in vivo preclinical therapeutic research involving animals. Once implanted subcutaneously in the animal, these pumps ensure a constant rate of delivery of the investigated drug for a maximum period of 28 days. This method of drug administration presents several advantages for research purposes over conventional delivery systems, including (i) the maintenance of a constant concentration of the drug to maximize its efficacy and reduce adverse effects, (ii) the elimination of the need for researcher intervention during the experiment, and (iii) the time savings by removing the need for frequent handling and repetitive injection of the animal [36]. Although implanted osmotic pumps require general anaesthesia for administration and removal, this is typically manageable in wildlife rehabilitation centres and zoos, where anaesthesia is commonly utilised for most procedures [19]. Consequently, the ALZET® device enables the assessment of long-term drug efficacy during the investigative phase [36].
The potential of osmotic pumps as a drug delivery device is obvious, as evidenced by the numerous commercial treatments based on this technology listed in Table 1. On the other hand, osmotic drug delivery systems based on osmotic pumps, including CPOPs [9,34], PPOPs [10], and EOPs [11,12], whether implantable or orally administered devices, are constantly being developed by medical researchers. These include the treatment of hearing loss [38], multiple sclerosis [39], hypertension [40], and Duchenne muscular dystrophy [41]. Table 2 shows the most recent studies on osmotic pumps, grouped by route of administration: (i) oral, (ii) implanted, or (iii) in vitro tests.
It is therefore worth highlighting the significant importance of osmotic drug delivery devices, not only as a widely used tool in clinical research but also because of the existence of commercial treatments based on this type of systems. This fact underlines the feasibility and advantages of osmotic pumps in the field of controlled drug release. In this context, an understanding of the phenomena underlying osmotic pump-based drug delivery systems is crucial to progress in the design of these devices. Therefore, a brief description of the FO phenomenon is given in the next section.

3. Osmotic Pump Operation: The Forward Osmosis Phenomenon

As illustrated in Figure 5, forward osmosis (FO) is a natural process whereby water flux is generated by the osmotic pressure gradient (Δπ) between a low osmotic pressure solution, designated as a feed solution (FS), and a high osmotic pressure solution, designated as a draw solution (DS), separated by a semipermeable membrane [13,17]. During the process, water molecules migrate from the FS to the DS, thereby diluting the DS and reducing the osmotic pressure difference between the two phases. Once the equilibrium between the two phases has been reached, the process remains stable [56].
The water flux in FO processes is determined by the following equation [17]:
J w = A ( π D S − π F S )
where J w m   s − 1 is the water flux, A m   P a − 1   s − 1 is the membrane permeability, and π D S and π F S   ( P a ) are the bulk osmotic pressure of the DS and FS, respectively.
The solute flow across the membrane is described by Fick’s law, as given in Equation (2) [57]:
J s = B ∆ C
where J s   k g   m − 2   s − 1 is the solute flux, B m   s − 1 is the solute permeability within the membrane, and ∆ C k g   m − 3 is the concentration gradient of solute across the active layer of the membrane.
The selection of the most appropriate DS and its regeneration stage has a significant impact on the FO process. Therefore, for general applications the DS must (i) create a significant osmotic pressure difference between the FS and DS, (ii) have a negligible reverse solute flux (RSF), (iii) be available in sufficient quantities, (iv) be affordable, (v) be non-toxic, and (vi) be easy and inexpensive to regenerate after the process [56]. Thus, DS options include inorganic and organic salts, volatile compounds, polyelectrolyte and switchable polarity solutions [14], and others such as functionalized nanoparticles and Na+-functionalized carbon quantum dots [58], carefully selected in accordance with the specific application. Although commercial compounds such as glucose, sodium chloride, magnesium chloride, or magnesium sulphate have been used as DSs, these compounds cause reverse solute flux (RSF) and water contamination and require high-energy processes for regeneration, making them challenging for large-scale use [59]. On the other hand, the DS regeneration stage is crucial for the sustainability of the FO process. After the FO process, the osmotic gradient is reduced due to the dilution of the DS. As a result, the excess water in the DS can be extracted in order to recover the DS for future use [13]. Conventional DS recovery is based on energy-intensive membrane and thermal desalination processes, such as reverse osmosis (RO), ultrafiltration (UF), or membrane distillation (MD), which have negative impacts on the energy consumption of the overall process, thus affecting the viability of the FO process [13,20]. Consequently, the economic viability of the FO process would be improved if a sustainable, effective, and low-cost regeneration phase could be achieved [13].

4. Magnetic Nanoparticles as Draw Solutions in Forward Osmosis

In response to these issues, MNPs have received particular attention over traditional DSs because they ensure an efficient regeneration stage and negligible RSF. MNPs consist of nanoparticles (NPs) of pure iron, nickel, cobalt, and their oxides, ferrites, and metallic alloys. The main characteristic of these nanomaterials is their superparamagnetic behaviour, a phenomenon that appears below a certain particle diameter depending on the material. Superparamagnetic materials exhibit high magnetic saturation values that are several orders of magnitude higher than those typical of paramagnetic materials, resulting in a strong response to an external magnetic field [21,60,61,62], and the highest value of magnetization that a material can achieve is known as saturation magnetization. In addition, coercivity and remanent magnetization are important magnetic properties to consider when formulating DSs with MNPs. Coercivity indicates the required magnetic field to demagnetize the materials, while remanent magnetization indicates the magnetization of the materials in absence of an applied magnetic field. For superparamagnetic materials, both coercivity and remanent magnetization are equal to zero [63,64]. Hence, magnetic nanoparticles, due to their superparamagnetic behaviour, do not exhibit magnetic properties unless an external magnetic field is applied. Thus, their magnetic moment vectors relax in the absence of an external magnetic field, resulting in minimal attraction between particles, which reduces the risk of agglomeration [21,60,61,62,63]. Minimizing agglomeration also reduces the decrease in water flux obtained using the MNPs as the DS in several cycles of use [56]. These superparamagnetic properties also lead to a sensitive response when an external magnetic field is applied [63], which would facilitate the recovery of the MNPs for subsequent use as a DS. Therefore, the superparamagnetic properties of MNPs allow them to be easily recovered using an external magnetic field.
However, bare MNPs are unable to generate sufficient osmotic pressure or disperse properly, leading to agglomeration and difficulty in their separation from the diluted DS, which limits their application as a DS [14,59]. These drawbacks can be overcome by a tailor-made coating or functionalization, as shown in Figure 6, which is facilitated by the easily modifiable surface of MNPs [56]. Smaller sizes of MNPs result in a higher coated/functionalized surface area/volume ratio, which is important to consider in order to generate high osmotic pressure as it affects the performance of the process [65]. For example, their osmotic pressure, hydrophilicity, and dispersibility can be efficiently increased by modifying the NP surface with low-molecular-weight and highly water-soluble polymers [59].
Therefore, the advantages of using coated/functionalized MNPs as the DS include (i) a high water flux, (ii) low energy, (iii) biocompatibility [56], (iv) high surface area/volume ratio, (v) low toxicity [66], (vi) easy recovery of the particles by a magnetic field due to their superparamagnetic behaviour, and (vii) the possibility of reuse [56,66].
A systematic review was conducted using Scopus as the database to identify relevant articles on the use of MNPs as the DS in FO. The search employed the following keywords: “draw solution”, “magnetic nanoparticle*”, and “forward osmosis” combined with the Boolean operator “and”. Only original research articles were considered, with no restriction on the publication date, resulting in the identification of 35 scientific articles on the topic. Thus, Table 3 presents the advances in the use of MNPs as osmotic agents in FO processes, differentiated by the compound used for coating/functionalization: (i) MNPs coated/functionalized with organic acids and their derivatives, (ii) MNPs coated/functionalized with organic polymers, (iii) MNPs coated/functionalized with polysaccharides, (iv) MNPs coated/functionalized with other organic compounds, and (v) bare MNPs and MNPs coated/functionalized with inorganic compounds.
The literature review in Table 3 indicates that a large variety of compounds are used for coating/functionalizing MNPs, from organic compounds, such as tri-sodium citrate or polyethylene glycol, to inorganic compounds, such as EDTA or potassium. These can be classified into five categories: (i) organic acids and their derivatives, (ii) organic polymers, (iii) polysaccharides, (iv) other organic compounds, and (v) bare and inorganic compounds. Nevertheless, most of the studies reviewed in Table 3 employed organic compounds to coat and functionalize the MNPs. These organically coated MNPs have received particular attention due to the advantages they offer as DSs, including (i) improved stability [56], (ii) a high surface area/volume ratio, (iii) easy tuning of the osmotic properties by surface modification, (iv) easy recovery due to superparamagnetic properties, (v) non-toxicity, and (vi) a low RSF due to large molecular sizes [73,89]. Consequently, the aforementioned properties, including the osmotic pressure and RSF, are contingent upon the organic coating. While the organic coating is a crucial factor to consider when synthesizing coated/functionalized MNP for use as a sustainable DS, it may affect their magnetic properties, thereby impeding particle recovery [89]. In this context, the use of specific organic compounds stands out from others. Polyacrylic acid, polyethylene glycol, and poly-sodium acrylate are the most frequently used organic compounds. Nevertheless, it is not possible to establish a reliable correlation between the same functionalization compounds in MNPs due to differences in the experimental conditions of the synthesis and a lack of information in the studies.
Regarding the synthesis method, the most commonly employed for MNPs is co-precipitation, as shown in Table 3. This is a straightforward, cost-effective, and extensively researched alternative, independently of the compound used for its functionalization [61,62]. The exception to this is the case of MNPs synthesized by coating with polymers, where the thermal decomposition method is the most commonly employed. Yang et al. employed polyglycerol as a coating material for MNPs and carried out the functionalization via thermal decomposition [80,81,82].
With regard to the particle properties, most of the articles presented in Table 3 describe MNPs as having a size within the range of 3–40 nm. The differences in size among MNPs synthesized by the same method are highlighted, such as for tri-sodium citrate-, poly-sodium acrylate- or polyacrylic acid-coated MNPs, where size variations of an order of magnitude can be observed. It is of significant importance to note that the synthesis method plays a pivotal role in determining the properties of the particle, including the size. Particle size depends on a number of variables, including the residence time, reactant flow rates, precursor concentration, pH, and temperature. Even minor alterations to the synthesis method can have a profound impact on the particle properties, resulting in disparate particle sizes [61].
Once the MNPs have been synthesised, their potential as a DS in FO systems was evaluated. This was typically performed using membranes in the range 1.8–180 cm2 with a predominance of cellulose triacetate as the FO membrane material, as shown in Table 3. Generally, commercial membranes are used, highlighting suppliers such as Hydration Tech. Innovations, Porifera Inc. or Aquaporin A/S. The functionalization of MNPs enables the attainment of a sufficient osmotic pressure to concentrate the FS, typically using deionized water or an NaCl solution as the FS, resulting in water fluxes comparable to those obtained with a conventional DS but with a negligible RSF. For instance, polyacrylic acid-coated MNPs with a concentration of 0.08 M have been observed to achieve water fluxes of 12.0–13.9 LMH when using deionized water as the FS and 3.0–6.3 LMH when using a 3.5% (w/w) NaCl solution [70,71]. An interesting observation pertains to the utilization of MNPs coated with tri-sodium citrate. In both cases presented in Table 3, cellulose triacetate membranes from the supplier Hydration Tech. Innovations were employed. Concentrations of 0.02–2.00 g·L−1 of the tri-sodium citrate-coated MNPs resulted in fluxes of 34.7 and 17.3 LMH, respectively, when using deionized water as the FS [78,79]. Conversely, particles coated with hyperbranched polyglycerol have been investigated as the DS using Hydration Tech. Innovations membranes. In this case, the DS concentration range was considerably higher, spanning 300–500 g·L−1. However, despite the increased concentration, the resulting water fluxes were lower compared to the previous examples, falling within the range of 3.0–7.2 LMH [80,81,82]. However, given the variations in experimental conditions across these examples and the reviewed literature presented in Table 3, drawing definitive conclusions about the performance of each type of MNPs as a DS remains challenging.
With regard to the regeneration step of the diluted DS, a number of different methods may be employed, including membrane processes, such as ultrafiltration, and thermal processes, such as heating. Nevertheless, the prevailing approach in the literature for the recovery of MNPs is the application of an external magnetic field. The studies presented in Table 3 clearly illustrate the principal advantage of utilizing MNPs as the DS in FO, namely, their simple recovery by means of an external magnetic field, which results in a cost-effective regeneration step with almost complete recovery of the particles.
The phenomenon of superparamagnetism is evidenced by the negligible coercivity and remanence, as well as the values of saturated mass magnetization, which fall within the range of 3.8–78 emu g−1, as illustrated in Table 3. This property allows the particles to be recovered by an external magnetic field, whereby their magnetic properties are lost when the magnetic field is removed and they are prevented from attracting each other, thus reducing the risk of agglomeration. Even at low values of saturated mass magnetization, around 5 emu g−1, the particles can be manipulated by a magnetic field, achieving a recovery rate of 63.4% [15], which serves to highlight their enormous potential.
There are different alternatives for the recovery of the MNPs from the DS. High gradient magnetic separation (HGMS) columns and open gradient magnetic separation (OGMS) systems are some of the processes used for the recovery of MNPs in large-scale applications. However, these processes have several limitations; they require large and expensive pieces, as well as the high amount of energy required for separation [60]. In contrast, micro magnetic separators (MMS) have emerged as an attractive alternative for small applications. MMS have several advantages, including (i) high efficiency, (ii) portability, (iii) rapid and selective separation, (iv) low cost to produce, (v) high surface area/volume ratio, (vi) reduction of the use of reactants and waste production, (vii) precise control of the fluid flow, and (viii) the capability of continuous separation [21,60]. Additionally, the most important advantage of MMS is the use of permanent magnets as a power-free magnetic field source, as opposed to the energy-intensive HGMS and OGMS [21].
In addition to the information shown in Table 3, a number of studies have been conducted to assess the recyclability of MNPs following their utilization as the DS in FO experiments. The water fluxes obtained with the recovered MNPs exhibited a slight decrease in comparison to those of the fresh MNPs. In 2023, Hassanein et al. reported a 25% reduction in water flux after four cycles of MNP reuse, while Shoorangiz et al. observed a 22% reduction after three cycles [14,88]. Nevertheless, other authors have observed a lower water flux reduction, at 11% [63], and even values as low as 3–6% after three cycles [86,91]. These findings demonstrate that the recovered MNPs can be effectively reused in subsequent FO cycles. The reduction in water flux can be attributed to a number of factors, including (i) particle aggregation, (ii) the loss of a small fraction of the MNPs during the recovery process [85], (iii) membrane fouling, and (iv) the interaction between the membrane and MNPs [14,79]. To offset the reduction in water flux when using recovered MNPs, strategies that leverage their magnetic properties can be employed. Examples of such strategies include the use of magnetic composite FO membranes [77] or the implantation of an external magnetic field controller during the FO process in order to reduce the interaction between the membrane and the MNPs [79]. Furthermore, ultrasonication can be employed to reduce the agglomeration of the recovered particles, thereby restoring their performance in the FO process [71].
Despite the considerable potential of utilizing MNPs as a DS, further research is required in order to render them economically and technically viable prior to their implementation as a sustainable DS on a large scale [13,88]. Until now, previous studies have been conducted on a laboratory scale. Consequently, the integration of MNPs into the FO process would be highly advantageous for technological applications in small-scale processes. This approach helps to circumvent technical challenges, including issues such as agglomeration, membrane interaction, and more complex recovery that might arise in larger-scale processes. Furthermore, there may also be economic and technical challenges due to the large amount of nanoparticles required for the process. A number of studies, including those by Zhou et al. in 2015, Ge et al. in 2016, and Yang et al. in 2014, 2015, and 2016, have indicated that high concentrations of particles are necessary for the FO process, with concentrations exceeding 100 g·L−1 and up to 600 g·L−1 [68,80,81,82,83]. Therefore, it is reasonable to consider the use of MNPs in processes that require a smaller volume of the DS in order to exploit the attractive possibilities of MNPs as the DS, while promoting the economic feasibility of the process. In this context, MNPs could be employed as osmotic agents in osmotic pump-based drug delivery systems, which could represent an intriguing strategy to overcome the limitations of current controlled delivery devices.

5. Conceptual Proposal of Systems Based on Osmotic Pumps and MNPs

The widespread use of osmotic pumps in controlled drug delivery demonstrates the immense potential of these systems, as shown in Table 1 and Table 2. Although the main application of MNPs in FO is focused on wastewater treatment and water reclamation [15,58,59], this does not exclude the possibility of integrating MNPs into medical devices. The fact that the integration of both systems has not been considered makes it an attractive area for further research, paving the way to a new multidisciplinary field of research among chemical and biomedical engineering, as well as medicine.
The integration of MNPs into medical devices could have several advantages. First and foremost, this integrated medical device would incorporate all the benefits of conventional osmotic pumps. This would lead to the design of novel medical devices that achieve controlled and constant drug delivery without the need for batteries or any electronic component [19,29]. As a result, it would reduce the dosing frequency and medical intervention [12,19,36]. Furthermore, the utilization of MNPs as osmotic agents would confer several advantages due to the exceptional properties of MNPs. Studies on the use of MNPs in FO processes have demonstrated the high regeneration of the diluted DS composed of MNPs by an external magnetic field, which would facilitate the re-concentration of DS for subsequent use [56,66,86]. Furthermore, the superparamagnetic properties of the particles can be exploited to achieve even more precise drug release by utilizing materials with magnetic or other stimuli-responsive properties, such as magnetic nanocomposite FO membranes [26], or by implementing a constant magnetic field [79]. Furthermore, in terms of performance, MNPs offer negligible RSF across the membrane [13,86,92], thus avoiding any undesirable interaction between the MNPs and the human body. This technology could also facilitate the simultaneous, controlled delivery of multiple drugs with independent release rates from a single device. Moreover, in the case of designing drug release devices in which the drug shares the same reservoir as the osmotic agents, such as EOP- or CPOP-based devices, regulating the delivery orifice can prevent the loss of MNPs. This approach could help maintain the osmotic gradient, achieving better control over the release and avoiding potential interactions between the osmotic agents and the organism.
In conclusion, the proposed drug delivery systems below have the potential to contribute to the development of novel controlled drug delivery systems with excellent and attractive properties. The absence of studies on this proposal highlights the necessity for further research and development of these promising medical devices. This could potentially lead to the creation of affordable treatments for NCDs, particularly in low-income countries, representing a significant stride towards the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals 3 “Good health and well-being” and 10 “Reduced inequalities” set forth in the 2030 Agenda [5,93].

5.1. Wearable Device for Drug Delivery

In light of the aforementioned considerations, a wearable drug delivery system based on the integration of osmotic pumps and MNPs is proposed in Figure 7.
The proposed medical device, depicted in Figure 7, comprises the following components: (i) an external rigid shell, (ii) a water reservoir (FS), (iii) an FO membrane, (iv) a DS reservoir, (v) a rigid sliding wall, (vi) a drug delivery orifice, and (vi) a drug reservoir. During the process, as shown in Figure 7(2), the volume of the DS compartment gradually increases due to the water flux generated by difference in osmotic pressure between the FS and DS composed of MNPs. This results in the displacement of the rigid sliding wall, compression of the drug reservoir, and its controlled release.
It is highly important to carefully select the rigid sliding wall material, as it is directly in contact with the drug. Hence, the ideal material must (i) have enough mechanical strength to avoid undesirable breaks during the process, (ii) be biocompatible, and (iii) be impermeable to prevent interactions with the MNPs and the body. In case of ALZET® osmotic pumps, the material used in the elastic wall is a thermoplastic hydrocarbon elastomer [94]. Due to their excellent properties, these materials are used in several medical applications, including in the fabrication of artificial hearts, mammary implants, and matrices for controlled drug delivery. For instance, thermoplastic elastomers based on poly(styrene-bisobutylene-b-styrene) are used as a coating in drug delivery owing to their (i) low permeability, (ii) elasticity, (iii) thermal stability, and (iv) biocompatibility [95]. Therefore, these kinds of materials might be an appropriate choice for making the rigid sliding wall of the device.
As the device depicted in Figure 7 is small, the purpose of integrating MNPs with osmotic pumps does not reside in the regeneration of the DS, since it would not have a great impact to regenerate a DS of such a small volume, but in the fact that MNPs have a negligible RSF. As the process is driven by the phenomenon of osmosis, RSF would result in an undesired decrease in the osmotic pressure difference between the FS and DS, leading to a decrease in the flow of water. A reduction in water flow results in a slower increase in the volume of the DS, causing a reduction in the drug release rate as compared to the desired release rate. However, the use of MNPs as the DS would result in better control of the water flux, obtaining a more precise and controlled release in the patient.
The proposed medical device could potentially replace the disposable mechanical pumps. These disposable drug delivery systems, particularly elastomeric pumps, are receiving special attention over electronic pumps due to their numerous advantages. These include (i) the ease of use, (ii) light weight and small size, (iii) ease of transport, (iv) independence from an external energy source [96,97], (v) disposability, (vi) no programming errors, and (vii) low cost [96]. The continuous infusion rate of elastomeric pumps is achieved through the generation of pressure by an elastomeric balloon. The pressure exerts a force on the drug reservoir, resulting in the infusion of the drug into the patient’s body through a narrow tube without the need for an external energy source [96,98]. This drug delivery system has been successfully employed in a number of fields, including analgesia, chemotherapy, and cardiology [98]. However, these systems have several disadvantages. Firstly, they allow for a faster infusion rate than is prescribed, with rates of 110–150% at the beginning and end of treatment [97]. Secondly, they are dependent on environmental factors, such as temperature, atmospheric pressure, and fluid viscosity variation, as well as height relative to the catheter location [96,97]. Thirdly, they have a lower accuracy compared to electronic pumps. Consequently, the proposed drug delivery system could result in the development of an alternative medical device that overcomes the instability of elastomeric pumps with regard to infusion rates, while maintaining their various advantages.

5.2. Extracorporeal Device for Drug Delivery

The combination of MNPs and osmotic pumps could also lead to the development of bigger drug delivery devices, as shown in Figure 8.
The extracorporeal device proposed in Figure 8 is similar to the wearable device in Section 5.1. The water flow from the water reservoir to the DS reservoir across an FO membrane increases the volume of the DS reservoir, moving a sliding wall and causing the release of the drug at a controlled rate.
Besides the low RSF of the MNPs, the regeneration of the DS in this proposed drug delivery system by an external magnetic field provides an interesting advantage, as MNPs have great potential to be reused in subsequent applications. The proposed design ensures that once the drug contained in the delivery system has been consumed, the water that has migrated from the water into the DS reservoir during the process can be drained using an external magnetic field, as depicted in Figure 8(3). This process allows the MNPs to be reused and the DS to be concentrated to the required level. Once the drug and water have been replenished in their respective reservoirs, the medical drug delivery system can be reused for a new treatment cycle.
Therefore, this drug delivery system represents an innovative alternative to other intravenous administration systems used in hospitals, such as volumetric pumps, syringe pumps, epidural pumps, or other types of infusion pumps [99]. In contrast to conventional infusion pumps, the proposed extracorporeal drug delivery system could also achieve controlled release of the drug but without relying on electricity for its operation, which is particularly valuable in locations with limited access to an electricity supply.
As a summary, Table 4 shows the main advantages that the proposed systems, resulting from the integration of osmotic pumps and MNPs, would have over some of the available drug delivery systems.

5.3. Considerations in the Design of Osmotically Driven Drug Delivery Systems

In the design of osmosis-based drug delivery systems, phenomena and parameters that are a possible cause of the reduction in technology efficacy, such as concentration polarization (CP) or reverse solute flux (RSF), must be considered.
Semipermeable FO membranes are designed to permit the passage of water, while rejecting unwanted compounds. Nevertheless, solute flux is unavoidable [56,59]. In FO, solute diffusion can occur in both directions, where RSF is solute diffusion from the DS side to the FS side. This solute diffusion reduces the osmotic pressure difference, decreasing the water flux across the membrane [56,57]. In the case of drug delivery systems based on osmotic pumps, a decrease in water flux results in a slower drug release with respect to the desired one, which would lead to less precession of the device. However, when using MNPs as osmotic agents, as they have a negligible RSF, this undesired phenomenon could be minimized [13,86,89].
CP, as illustrated in Figure 9, is a phenomenon by which the molecules accumulate on the surface of membranes, resulting in a reduction in the osmotic pressure difference and a subsequent reduction in the water flux. Thus, similar to RSF, a decrease in water flux would result in lower precision in drug release. A distinction can be made between external concentration polarization (ECP), whereby the concentration profile occurs on the external surface of the dense active layer, and internal concentration polarization (ICP), whereby the concentration profile occurs within the porous support of the membrane [17,100].
In dense FO symmetric membranes, ECP can occur on both sides of the membrane. To quantify ECP, the water flux can be expressed as follows [17,100]:
J w = A π D S exp ⁡ − J w k D S − π F S exp ⁡ J w k F S
where k D S and k F S   m   s − 1 are the mass transfer coefficients on the DS and FS sides, respectively.
Since in the proposed drug delivery systems there is no fluid movement, ECP does not occur, and so Equation (3) is simplified as Equation (1), resulting in no decrease in the osmotic pressure difference, as shown in Figure 10(1).
Conversely, in asymmetrical FO membranes, which are formed by a porous support bounded by a compact active layer, it is essential to consider the ICP phenomenon that occurs within the membrane. Consequently, for asymmetrical membranes, the water flux can be described by considering ECP on the surface of active layer, since it is assumed that no ECP occurs on the support layer side of the membrane, and ICP. When the active layer is in contact with the FS, the water flux is determined by the following equation [17,100]:
J w = A π D S exp ⁡ − J w   K − π F S exp ⁡ J w k F S
Considering there is no ECP because there is no fluid movement in the proposed drug delivery systems, as depicted in Figure 10(2), water flux is defined using the following equation:
J w = A π D S exp ⁡ − J w   K − π F S
However, if the porous support layer is in contact with the FS, the equation for water flux considering ECP and ICP is described as follows:
J w = A π D S exp ⁡ − J w k D S − π F S exp ⁡ J w   K
As there is no ECP in the proposed devices, as illustrated in Figure 10(3), the equation is simplified as follows:
J w = A π D S − π F S exp ⁡ J w   K
where K s   m − 1 is the solute resistivity inside the porous support layer. It is defined by the following equation:
K = t   τ D   ε
where D m 2   s − 1 is the diffusion coefficient of the solute in the solution, and t ( m ) , τ ( − ) , and ε ( − ) are the thickness, tortuosity, and porosity of the support layer of the FO membrane, respectively.
Although ECP is not considered in the proposed devices due to the absence of fluid movement, it is important to note that when designing drug delivery devices based on osmotic pumps with fluid movement, considering ECP could be a key factor in the accuracy of the control system.
In the context of osmotic pumps, CP and RSF are undesirable phenomena that should be considered during the design of the drug delivery system. They lead to a decrease in the osmotic gradient, resulting in reduced water flux across the membrane. This reduction could have a negative impact on the kinetics of drug release. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms underlying this drug release device is crucial. By accounting for all the phenomena that deviate from idealization, more accurate devices can be developed.
Moreover, as the DS dilutes over time, the regeneration of the DS is a critical stage for the viability of the overall FO process. By formulating the DS with MNPs, the diluted DS can be easily regenerated using an external magnetic field after the FO process is completed, as illustrated in Figure 8(3). This regeneration enables the DS to be reused in subsequent cycles.
Recovery using an external magnetic field is attributed to the action of a magnetic force, described by the following equation [60,101,102]:
F m = μ 0   V p   M p ∇   H a
where F m ( N ) is the magnetic force, μ 0 is the permeability of the free space (4 π 10−7 H m−1), V p   ( m 3 ) is the volume of the particle, M p   A   m − 1 is the magnetization of the particle, and H a   ( T ) is the applied magnetic field.
According to Equation (9), the magnetic force is proportional to the volume of the particle, which means that larger volumes result in a greater magnetic force, making separation easier. Nevertheless, size is a critical factor in FO processes with a DS based on MNPs. In order to maintain small particle sizes while generating sufficient magnetic force for MNP recovery, considering the material of the MNPs is critical. The use of MNPs with a high saturation magnetization mass, such as superparamagnetic materials, increases the magnetic force applied by the magnet, as it is proportional to the magnetization of the particle, thus facilitating the separation of the MNPs from the DS [101].
Therefore, magnetic recovery of the MNPs from the diluted DS would be a viable option, especially in devices with a higher quantity of MNPs, such as the extracorporeal device proposed. Moreover, MMS could be used for recovery due to several advantages, standing out is the power-free generation of the external magnetic field using a permanent magnet [21,60].

5.4. Integration in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing

The integration of technologies also has the potential to be utilized in industries. For instance, it could be employed in the pharmaceutical industry as a concentration or reagent dosing method. In more specific terms, the dissolution of active ingredients in organic solvents is a common procedure in the synthesis of pharmaceutical drugs. This process necessitates the separation and purification of the active ingredients in order to achieve the desired drug quality [103], with this stage representing a significant proportion of the investment in the pharmaceutical industry. However, classical purification methods are energy-intensive and use toxic solvents, which has led to the necessity to develop non-thermal, cost-effective, and sustainable purification methods [103,104]. In this context, organic solvent forward osmosis (OSFO) has been investigated as a promising process for concentrating active pharmaceutical ingredients while extracting organic solvents [103]. DSs such as LiCl [105], polyethylene glycol 400 [104,106], and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazoliumbis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide [103] have been employed in OSFO, thereby demonstrating the potential of the technology. Nevertheless, the RSF, CP, and the energy-intensive regeneration of the DS represent limitations to the process. As discussed in previous sections, the formulation of DS with functionalized MNPs could achieve the desired concentration of active pharmaceutical ingredients, enabling the regeneration of the DS with a low energy requirement. In this regard, Figure 11 depicts a scheme for integrating MNPs and FO as a concentration method in the pharmaceutical industry.
The integration of MNPs and FO could also lead to the development of a novel dosing pump with low energy requirements, as shown in Figure 12. This dosing pump could be implemented in the pharmaceutical industry for a controlled and constant flux of liquid reagent into reactors, based on the same mechanism as the extracorporeal device for drug delivery described in Section 5.2.
The use of MNPs in this type of dosing pumps would allow the regeneration of the DS composed of MNPs by applying an external magnetic field, resulting in a DS regeneration stage with a low energy requirement. This is particularly the case when permanent magnet-based DS regeneration systems, such as MMS, are employed, as they are less energy-intensive compared to traditional regeneration methods [13,20,21]. However, in this context, the application of this type of technology in the pharmaceutical industry is constrained by the scale of the process and the large required amount of MNPs, which currently renders it economically and technically unviable. Large-scale synthesis and functionalization of MNPs remains challenging since conventional methods, such as co-precipitation and thermal decomposition, are batch processes, resulting in a poor control of the variables if large volumes of MNPs are synthesized. Although both methods can be scaled up, co-precipitation requires proper control of process variables such as the temperature, reaction time, and precursors, with the control of particle size and distribution being a bottleneck in this synthesis method. In the case of thermal decomposition, although this method achieves a better control of the size of the particle and a narrow particle size distribution, finding the optimal conditions is challenging. Moreover, thermal decomposition is an expensive and energy-consuming method [61,107]. Consequently, although MNPs hold considerable potential for use in the pharmaceutical industry, the most promising application at present is their integration in osmotic pumps.

6. Outlook and Future Perspectives

MNPs have recently gained interest due to their remarkable properties, which have led to their use in a variety of fields. These include photocatalytic processes, wastewater treatment, high-performance separation processes, and drug delivery. In the context of FO, MNPs have been extensively studied for their use as a DS due to their ease of recovery, high functionalization capacity, and insignificant RSF. The application of MNPs in FO is focused on environmental applications, particularly in wastewater treatment and desalination. This review is the first to highlight the significant potential of integrating MNPs and medical devices for drug delivery, a topic that has not been considered in the literature to date.
The authors are confident that the findings presented in this study represent a significant advancement in the field of drug delivery systems, offering novel insights and potential avenues for enhancing their performance. The exceptional performance of osmotic pumps in drug delivery and MNPs in FO processes provides a rationale for exploring the integration of both technologies and the potential emergence of a novel approach to drug release.
Furthermore, this could represent a social breakthrough in addition to contributing to the generation of knowledge about medical devices for drug delivery. The advancement of these controlled drug delivery systems could result in several benefits, including a reduction in the frequency of drug administration, the elimination of the need for electronic devices, and the possible delivery of multiple drugs simultaneously. Additionally, MNP properties, such as the negligible RSF and superparamagnetism, can improve the precision in drug release and the reusability of the DS. This would be beneficial for the treatment of NCDs in developing countries, where the management of these diseases is a leading cause of death, by providing continuous and cost-effective healthcare.
Consequently, it would be highly advisable to invest economic and research efforts in the study and development of this type of device. Investing in the assessment of their technical feasibility and optimisation is therefore necessary in order to develop affordable devices for the treatment of NCDs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.B., D.N.-T., B.G.-M., and C.G.-F.; methodology, E.B., D.N.-T., B.G.-M., and C.G.-F.; formal analysis, E.B., D.N.-T., B.G.-M., C.G.-F., and M.-F.S.-R.; investigation, E.B., D.N.-T., B.G.-M., and C.G.-F.; resources, E.B., D.N.-T., B.G.-M., and C.G.-F.; writing—original draft preparation, E.B., D.N.-T., B.G.-M., and C.G.-F.; writing—review and editing, E.B., D.N.-T., B.G.-M., C.G.-F., and M.-F.S.-R.; visualization, E.B., D.N.-T., B.G.-M., C.G.-F., and M.-F.S.-R.; supervision, E.B., D.N.-T., B.G.-M., C.G.-F., I.O., and M.-F.S.-R.; project administration, E.B. and M.-F.S.-R.; funding acquisition, E.B. and M.-F.S.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was developed in the framework of the projects PID2020-115409RB-I00 financed by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and PDC2021-120786-I00 and TED2021-129874B-I00 financed by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by the European Union Next Generation EU/PRTR. David Navarro-Tumar is grateful for the Concepción Arenal predoctoral contract UC-23-28 from the University of Cantabria. Belén García-Merino would also like to express her gratitude to the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and Universities for the FPI predoctoral grant PRE2019-089339 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by “ESF Investing in your future”. Cristina González-Fernández also thanks the Spanish Ministry of Universities for the Margarita Salas postdoctoral fellowship (grants for the requalification of the Spanish university system for 2021–2023, University of Cantabria), funded by the European Union–NextGenerationEU.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analysed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

CPConcentration polarization
CPOPControlled porosity osmotic pump
DSDraw solution
ECPExternal concentration polarization
EOPElementary osmotic pump
FOForward osmosis
FSFeed solution
gMHg m−2 h−1
HGMSHigh gradient magnetic separation
HLPHiguchi–Leeper pump
HTPHiguchi–Theeuwes pump
ICPInternal concentration polarization
LMHL m−2 h−1
MDMembrane distillation
MMSMicro magnetic separator
MNPMagnetic nanoparticle
NCDNoncommunicable or chronic disease
NPNanoparticle
OGMSOpen gradient magnetic separation
OSFOOrganic solvent forward osmosis
PPOPPush–pull osmotic pump
RNPRose–Nelson pump
ROReverse osmosis
RSFReverse solute flux
UFUltrafiltration

References

  1. World Health Organization Noncommunicable Diseases. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases (accessed on 24 January 2024).
  2. World Health Organization. Access to NCD Medicines: Emergent Issues during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Key Structural Factors; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  3. United Nations Chronic Diseases Taking ‘Immense and Increasing Toll on Lives’, Warns WHO. Available online: https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/05/1136832 (accessed on 24 January 2024).
  4. United Nations Access to Chronic Disease Medication ‘Still out of Reach for Many’: WHO Report. Available online: https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/03/1134902 (accessed on 24 January 2024).
  5. The Global Goals Good Health and Well-Being. Available online: https://www.globalgoals.org/goals/3-good-health-and-well-being/ (accessed on 24 January 2024).
  6. García-Merino, B.; Bringas, E.; Ortiz, I. Fast and Reliable Analysis of PH-Responsive Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery Using Microfluidic Tools. Int. J. Pharm. 2023, 643, 123232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. World Health Organization Prioritizing Medical Devices. Available online: https://www.who.int/activities/prioritizing-medical-devices (accessed on 14 February 2024).
  8. European Commission Medical Devices—Sector. Overview. Available online: https://health.ec.europa.eu/medical-devices-sector/overview_en (accessed on 14 February 2024).
  9. Akhtar, M.F.; Ashraf, H.; Uzair, M.; Ahmad, S.; Rasul, A.; Abbas, G.; Shah, S.; Hanif, M. Development of Leachable Enalapril Tablets by Controlled Porosity Osmotic Pump Technique; a Unique Approach to Enhance Its Sustained Release Effect. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2022, 19, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Monton, C.; Kulvanich, P. Push-Pull Osmotic Pumps Using Crosslinked Hard Gelatin Capsule as a Structural Assembly for Delivery of Drugs with Different Water Solubilities. J. Pharm. Innov. 2022, 17, 791–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Joshi, M.; Gokhale, C.; Kenjale, P.; Pokharkar, V. Optimization of Diltiazem Hydrochloride Osmotic Formulation Using QBD Approach. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 58, e19779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gundu, R.; Pekamwar, S.; Shelke, S.; Kulkarni, D.; Gadade, D.; Shep, S. Development and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Osmotically Controlled Drug Delivery System of Valganciclovir HCl for Potential Application in the Treatment of CMV Retinitis. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2022, 12, 2708–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hafiz, M.; Hassanein, A.; Talhami, M.; Al-Ejji, M.; Hassan, M.K.; Hawari, A.H. Magnetic Nanoparticles Draw Solution for Forward Osmosis: Current Status and Future Challenges in Wastewater Treatment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hassanein, A.; Hafiz, M.A.; Hassan, M.K.; Ba-Abbad, M.M.; AL-Ejji, M.; Alfahel, R.; Mahmoud, K.A.; Talhami, M.; Hawari, A.H. Developing Sustainable Draw Solute for Forward Osmosis Process Using Poly(Amidoamine) Dendrimer Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles. Desalination 2023, 564, 116800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ma, D.; Tian, Y.; He, T.; Zhu, X. Preparation of Novel Magnetic Nanoparticles as Draw Solutes in Forward Osmosis Desalination. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2022, 46, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hafiz, M.; Talhami, M.; Ba-Abbad, M.M.; Hawari, A.H. Optimization of Magnetic Nanoparticles Draw Solution for High Water Flux in Forward Osmosis. Water 2021, 13, 3653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rastogi, N.K. Forward Osmosis: Principles, Applications, and Recent Developments. In Current Trends and Future Developments on (Bio-) Membranes; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 3–35. ISBN 9780128167779. [Google Scholar]
  18. Singh, S.K.; Maiti, A.; Pandey, A.; Jain, N.; Sharma, C. Fouling Limitations of Osmotic Pressure-Driven Processes and Its Remedial Strategies: A Review. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2023, 140, e53295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Coutant, T.; Cococcetta, C.; Prouillac, C.; Espana, B.; Le Barzic, C.; Arné, P.; Huynh, M. Osmotic Pump Maintains Plasma Concentrations of Meloxicam for 6 Days after Orthopedic Surgery in Pigeons (Columba Livia). Am. J. Vet. Res. 2023, 84, ajvr.22.11.0203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Aende, A.; Gardy, J.; Aslam, Z.; Rogers, M.; Edokali, M.; Cespedes, O.; Harbottle, D.; Hassanpour, A. A Novel Highly Osmotic K/Fe3O4/CNF Magnetic Draw Solution for Salty Water Desalination. Desalination 2022, 538, 115903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. González Fernández, C.; Gómez Pastora, J.; Basauri, A.; Fallanza, M.; Bringas, E.; Chalmers, J.J.; Ortiz, I. Continuous-Flow Separation of Magnetic Particles from Biofluids: How Does the Microdevice Geometry Determine the Separation Performance? Sensors 2020, 20, 3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gómez-Pastora, J.; González-Fernández, C.; Real, E.; Iles, A.; Bringas, E.; Furlani, E.P.; Ortiz, I. Computational Modeling and Fluorescence Microscopy Characterization of a Two-Phase Magnetophoretic Microsystem for Continuous-Flow Blood Detoxification. Lab Chip 2018, 18, 1593–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Materón, E.M.; Miyazaki, C.M.; Carr, O.; Joshi, N.; Picciani, P.H.S.; Dalmaschio, C.J.; Davis, F.; Shimizu, F.M. Magnetic Nanoparticles in Biomedical Applications: A Review. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 2021, 6, 100163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abedini-Nassab, R.; Pouryosef Miandoab, M.; Şaşmaz, M. Microfluidic Synthesis, Control, and Sensing of Magnetic Nanoparticles: A Review. Micromachines 2021, 12, 768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jajack, A.; Stamper, I.; Gomez, E.; Brothers, M.; Begtrup, G.; Heikenfeld, J. Continuous, Quantifiable, and Simple Osmotic Preconcentration and Sensing within Microfluidic Devices. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zaher, A.; Li, S.; Wolf, K.T.; Pirmoradi, F.N.; Yassine, O.; Lin, L.; Khashab, N.M.; Kosel, J. Osmotically Driven Drug Delivery through Remote-Controlled Magnetic Nanocomposite Membranes. Biomicrofluidics 2015, 9, 054113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ahmed, K.; Shoaib, M.H.; Yousuf, R.I.; Qazi, F.; Anwer, S.; Nasiri, M.I.; Mahmood, Z.A. Use of Opadry® CA—A Cellulose Acetate/Polyethylene Glycol System for Rate-Controlled Osmotic Drug Delivery of Highly Soluble Antispastic Agent Eperisone HCl. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2018, 37, 2730–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Patel, J.; Parikh, S.; Patel, S. Comprehensive Review on Osmotic Drug Delivery System. World J. Pharm. Res. 2021, 10, 523–550. [Google Scholar]
  29. Almoshari, Y. Osmotic Pump Drug Delivery Systems—A Comprehensive Review. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Monton, C.; Kulvanich, P. Characterization of Crosslinked Hard Gelatin Capsules for a Structural Assembly of Elementary Osmotic Pump Delivery System. J. Pharm. Investig. 2019, 49, 655–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gao, S.; Chen, Y.; Hu, R.; Lu, W.; Yu, L.; Chen, J.; Liu, S.; Guo, Y.; Shen, Q.; Wang, B.; et al. Visualized Analysis and Evaluation of Simultaneous Controlled Release of Metformin Hydrochloride and Gliclazide from Sandwiched Osmotic Pump Capsule. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2020, 46, 1776–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Akhtar, M.F.; Hanif, M. Leachable Pegylated Cellulose Acetate Complex: A Promising Approach for Controlled Porosity Osmotic Pump Tablets of Captopril. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2020, 17, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gundu, R.; Pekamwar, S.; Shelke, S.; Shep, S.; Kulkarni, D. Sustained Release Formulation of Ondansetron HCl Using Osmotic Drug Delivery Approach. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2020, 46, 343–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Patel, P.; Ladani, B.; Patel, G. Design, Optimization, and Characterization of an in-Situ Pore-Forming System for Controlled Delivery of Paliperidone. Med. Nov. Technol. Devices 2024, 21, 100284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Theeuwes, F.; Yum, S.I. Principles of the Design’ and Operation of Generic Osmotic Pumps for the Delivery of Semisolid or Liquid Drug Formulations. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 1976, 4, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Liu, S.; Miyoshi, M. Long-Term Constant Subcutaneous Drug Administration. Methods Mol. Biol. 2024, 2766, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Higuchi, T.; Leeper, H.; Theeuwes, F. Osmotic Dispenser with Means for Dispensing Active Agent Responsive to Osmotic Gradient. U.S. Patent 3,995,631, 7 December 1976. [Google Scholar]
  38. Dépreux, F.; Czech, L.; Young, H.; Richter, C.P.; Zhou, Y.; Whitlon, D.S. Statins Protect Mice from High-Decibel Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 163, 114674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Basole, C.P.; Nguyen, R.K.; Lamothe, K.; Billis, P.; Fujiwara, M.; Vang, A.G.; Clark, R.B.; Epstein, P.M.; Brocke, S. Treatment of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis with an Inhibitor of Phosphodiesterase-8 (PDE8). Cells 2022, 11, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, L.P.; Han, R.M.; Wu, B.; Luo, M.Y.; Deng, Y.H.; Wang, W.; Huang, C.; Xie, X.; Luo, J. Mst1 Silencing Alleviates Hypertensive Myocardial Injury Associated with the Augmentation of Microvascular Endothelial Cell Autophagy. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2022, 50, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Saoudi, A.; Fergus, C.; Gileadi, T.; Montanaro, F.; Morgan, J.E.; Kelly, V.P.; Tensorer, T.; Garcia, L.; Vaillend, C.; Muntoni, F.; et al. Investigating the Impact of Delivery Routes for Exon Skipping Therapies in the CNS of DMD Mouse Models. Cells 2023, 12, 908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. U.S. Food and Drug Administration ACTOPLUS MET XR (Pioglitazone and Metformin Hydrochloride-Release) Tablets for Oral Use. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/022024s014lbl.pdf (accessed on 25 September 2024).
  43. Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios Adalat Oros 30 mg Comprimidos de Liberación Prolongada. Available online: https://cima.aemps.es/cima/pdfs/es/ft/59538/FT_59538.html.pdf (accessed on 25 September 2024).
  44. U.S. Food and Drug Administration CONCERTA® (Methylphenidate HCl) Extended-Release Tablets CII. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2023/021121s049lbl.pdf (accessed on 25 September 2024).
  45. U.S. Food and Drug Administration DITROPAN XL® (Oxybutynin Chloride) Extended Release Tablets for Oral Use. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/020897s035lbl.pdf (accessed on 25 September 2024).
  46. Gador ELAFAX® XR 75-ELAFAX® XR 150. Available online: https://www.gador.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/ELAFAX-XR-G00076802-04.pdf (accessed on 25 September 2024).
  47. U.S. Food and Drug Administration GLUCOTROL XL® (Glipizide) Extended Release Tablets for Oral Use. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/020329Orig1s035lbl.pdf (accessed on 25 September 2024).
  48. U.S. Food and Drug Administration OSMOLEX ERTM (Amantadine) Extended-Release Tablets for Oral Use. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2018/209410s000lbl.pdf (accessed on 25 September 2024).
  49. U.S. Food and Drug Administration PROCARDIA XL® (Nifedipine) Extended Release Tablets for Oral Use. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/019684s029lbl.pdf (accessed on 25 September 2024).
  50. du Toit, L.C.; Hulisani Demana, P.; Essop Choonara, Y. A Nano-Enabled Biotinylated Anti-LDL Theranostic System to Modulate Systemic LDL Cholesterol. Int. J. Pharm. 2022, 628, 122258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. ALZET® Osmotic Pumps ALZET® Technical Tips. Available online: https://www.alzet.com/resources/alzet-technical-tips/#1560367721008-77489434-4a62 (accessed on 22 February 2024).
  52. Malfeld, K.; Baumhoff, P.; Volk, H.A.; Lenarz, T.; Scheper, V. Local Long-Term Inner Ear Drug Delivery in Normal Hearing Guinea Pig—An Animal Model to Develop Preventive Treatment for Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Feger, M.A.; Isaacs, J.; Mallu, S.; Yager, D.; Shall, M.; Patel, G.; Protzuk, O.; Bokkisam, A.S. Follistatin Protein Enhances Satellite Cell Counts in Reinnervated Muscle. J. Brachial Plex. Peripher. Nerve Inj. 2022, 17, e12–e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Katsuki, S.; Koga, J.I.; Matoba, T.; Umezu, R.; Nakashiro, S.; Nakano, K.; Tsutsui, H.; Egashira, K. Nanoparticle-Mediated Delivery of Pitavastatin to Monocytes/Macrophages Inhibits Angiotensin II-Induced Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Formation in Apoe−/− Mice. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2022, 29, 111–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Schwieger, J.; Frisch, A.S.; Rau, T.S.; Lenarz, T.; Hügl, S.; Scheper, V. 3D Printed Cell Culture Chamber for Testing the Effect of Pump-Based Chronic Drug Delivery on Inner Ear Tissue. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Vohl, S.; Ban, I.; Drofenik, M.; Buksek, H.; Gyergyek, S.; Petrinic, I.; Hélix-Nielsen, C.; Stergar, J. Microwave Synthesis of Poly(Acrylic) Acid-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles as Draw Solutes in Forward Osmosis. Materials 2023, 16, 4138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Johnson, D.J.; Suwaileh, W.A.; Mohammed, A.W.; Hilal, N. Osmotic’s Potential: An Overview of Draw Solutes for Forward Osmosis. Desalination 2018, 434, 100–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ban, I.; Drofenik, M.; Bukšek, H.; Petrinic, I.; Helix-Nielsen, C.; Vohl, S.; Gyergyek, S.; Stergar, J. Synthesis of Magnetic Nanoparticles with Covalently Bonded Polyacrylic Acid for Use as Forward Osmosis Draw Agents. Environ. Sci. 2023, 9, 442–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Asghar, N.; Nguyen, D.A.; Jang, A. Application of MnFe2O4 Magnetic Silica-Covered Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid-Functionalized Nanomaterials to the Draw Solution in Forward Osmosis. Chemosphere 2023, 330, 138735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Gómez-Pastora, J.; Xue, X.; Karampelas, I.H.; Bringas, E.; Furlani, E.P.; Ortiz, I. Analysis of Separators for Magnetic Beads Recovery: From Large Systems to Multifunctional Microdevices. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 172, 16–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. García-Merino, B.; Bringas, E.; Ortiz, I. Synthesis and Applications of Surface-Modified Magnetic Nanoparticles: Progress and Future Prospects. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2021, 38, 821–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. García-Merino, B.; Bringas, E.; Ortiz, I. Robust System for the Regenerative Capture of Aqueous Pollutants with Continuously Synthesized and Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nguyen, M.D.; Tran, H.V.; Xu, S.; Lee, T.R. Fe3O4 Nanoparticles: Structures, Synthesis, Magnetic Properties, Surface Functionalization, and Emerging Applications. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Savliwala, S.; Chiu-Lam, A.; Unni, M.; Rivera-Rodriguez, A.; Fuller, E.; Sen, K.; Threadcraft, M.; Rinaldi, C. Magnetic Nanoparticles. In Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications: Fundamental Concepts, Biological Interactions and Clinical Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 195–221. ISBN 9780128166628. [Google Scholar]
  65. Guizani, M.; Maeda, T.; Ito, R.; Funamizu, N. Synthesis and Characterization of Magnetic Nanoparticles as a Candidate Draw Solution for Forward Osmosis. J. Water Environ. Technol. 2018, 16, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Khazaie, F.; Sheshmani, S.; Shokrollahzadeh, S.; Shahvelayati, A.S. Desalination of Saline Water via Forward Osmosis Using Magnetic Nanoparticles Covalently Functionalized with Citrate Ions as Osmotic Agent. Environ. Technol. 2022, 43, 2113–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Petrinic, I.; Stergar, J.; Bukšek, H.; Drofenik, M.; Gyergyek, S.; Hélix-Nielsen, C.; Ban, I. Superparamagnetic Fe3O4@ca Nanoparticles and Their Potential as Draw Solution Agents in Forward Osmosis. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ge, Q.; Yang, L.; Cai, J.; Xu, W.; Chen, Q.; Liu, M. Hydroacid Magnetic Nanoparticles in Forward Osmosis for Seawater Desalination and Efficient Regeneration via Integrated Magnetic and Membrane Separations. J. Memb. Sci. 2016, 520, 550–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Shabani, Z.; Rahimpour, A. Chitosan- and Dehydroascorbic Acid-Coated Fe3O4 Nanoparticles: Preparation, Characterization and Their Potential as Draw Solute in Forward Osmosis Process. Iran. Polym. J. 2016, 25, 887–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mishra, T.; Ramola, S.; Shankhwar, A.K.; Srivastava, R.K. Use of Synthesized Hydrophilic Magnetic Nanoparticles (HMNPs) in Forward Osmosis for Water Reuse. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 2016, 16, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ling, M.M.; Chung, T.S. Desalination Process Using Super Hydrophilic Nanoparticles via Forward Osmosis Integrated with Ultrafiltration Regeneration. Desalination 2011, 278, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ling, M.M.; Wang, K.Y.; Chung, T.S. Highly Water-Soluble Magnetic Nanoparticles as Novel Draw Solutes in Forward Osmosis for Water Reuse. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 5869–5876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ban, I.; Markuš, S.; Gyergyek, S.; Drofenik, M.; Korenak, J.; Helix-Nielsen, C.; Petrinić, I. Synthesis of Poly-Sodium-Acrylate (PSA)-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles for Use in Forward Osmosis Draw Solutions. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Guizani, M.; Maeda, T.; Ito, R.; Funamizu, N. Engineering of Size-Controlled Magnetic Nanoparticles for Use as a Draw Solution in a Forward Osmosis Process. Desalin. Water Treat. 2019, 154, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Dey, P.; Izake, E.L. Mixed Polymer-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles as Forward Osmosis Draw Agents of Tuned Hydrophilicity. Chem. A Eur. J. 2016, 22, 11253–11260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Dey, P.; Izake, E.L. Magnetic Nanoparticles Boosting the Osmotic Efficiency of a Polymeric FO Draw Agent: Effect of Polymer Conformation. Desalination 2015, 373, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chi, X.Y.; Zhang, P.Y.; Guo, X.J.; Xu, Z.L. Interforce Initiated by Magnetic Nanoparticles for Reducing Internal Concentration Polarization in CTA Forward Osmosis Membrane. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 44852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kadhim, R.M.; Al-Abodi, E.E.; Al-Alawy, A.F. Citrate-Coated Magnetite Nanoparticles as Osmotic Agent in a Forward Osmosis Process. Desalin. Water Treat. 2018, 115, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Na, Y.; Yang, S.; Lee, S. Evaluation of Citrate-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles as Draw Solute for Forward Osmosis. Desalination 2014, 347, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yang, H.M.; Park, C.W.; Han, M.J.; Seo, B.K.; Moon, J.K.; Lee, K.W. Hyperbranched Polyglycerol Carboxylate-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles as a Draw Solute in a Combined Forward Osmosis and Ultrafiltration Process. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2016, 16, 10858–10863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yang, H.M.; Seo, B.K.; Lee, K.W.; Moon, J.K. Hyperbranched Polyglycerol-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles as Draw Solute in Forward Osmosis. Asian J. Chem. 2014, 26, 4031–4034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yang, H.M.; Choi, H.M.; Jang, S.C.; Han, M.J.; Seo, B.K.; Moon, J.K.; Lee, K.W. Succinate Functionalization of Hyperbranched Polyglycerol-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles as a Draw Solute during Forward Osmosis. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2015, 15, 8279–8284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhou, A.; Luo, H.; Wang, Q.; Chen, L.; Zhang, T.C.; Tao, T. Magnetic Thermoresponsive Ionic Nanogels as Novel Draw Agents in Forward Osmosis. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 15359–15365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ge, Q.; Su, J.; Chung, T.S.; Amy, G. Hydrophilic Superparamagnetic Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization, and Performance in Forward Osmosis Processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhao, Q.; Chen, N.; Zhao, D.; Lu, X. Thermoresponsive Magnetic Nanoparticles for Seawater Desalination. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 11453–11461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Khazaie, F.; Shokrollahzadeh, S.; Bide, Y.; Sheshmani, S.; Shahvelayati, A.S. Forward Osmosis Using Highly Water Dispersible Sodium Alginate Sulfate Coated-Fe3O4 Nanoparticles as Innovative Draw Solution for Water Desalination. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2021, 146, 789–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bai, H.; Liu, Z.; Sun, D.D. Highly Water Soluble and Recovered Dextran Coated Fe3O4 Magnetic Nanoparticles for Brackish Water Desalination. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 81, 392–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Shoorangiz, L.; Karimi-Jashni, A.; Azadi, F.; Zerafat, M.M. Water Treatment by Forward Osmosis Using Novel D-Xylose Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles as Draw Agent. Environ. Technol. 2022, 43, 3309–3318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Tayel, A.; Nasr, P.; Sewilam, H. Forward Osmosis Desalination Using Pectin-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles as a Draw Solution. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2019, 21, 1617–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Shakeri, A.; Salehi, H.; Khankeshipour, N.; Nakhjiri, M.T.; Ghorbani, F. Magnetic Nanoparticle-Crosslinked Ferrohydrogel as a Novel Class of Forward Osmosis Draw Agent. J. Nanopart. Res. 2018, 20, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bide, Y.; Shokrollahzadeh, S. Toward Tailoring of a New Draw Solute for Forward Osmosis Process: Branched Poly (Deep Eutectic Solvent)-Decorated Magnetic Nanoparticles. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 320, 114409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Tayel, A.; Nasr, P.; Sewilam, H. Enhanced Water Flux Using Uncoated Magnetic Nanoparticles as a Draw Solution in Forward Osmosis Desalination. Desalin. Water Treat. 2020, 193, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. The Global Goals Reduced Inequalities. Available online: https://www.globalgoals.org/goals/10-reduced-inequalities/ (accessed on 13 May 2024).
  94. ALZET® Osmotic Pumps Specifications. Available online: https://www.alzet.com/products/alzet_pumps/specifications/ (accessed on 22 August 2024).
  95. Basak, S. Thermoplastic Elastomers in Biomedical Industry–Evolution and Current Trends. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A Pure Appl. Chem. 2021, 58, 579–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Sabbagh Dit Hawasli, R.; Barton, S.; Nabhani-Gebara, S. Ambulatory Chemotherapy: Past, Present, and Future. J. Oncol. Pharm. Pract. 2021, 27, 962–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Figueroa-Restrepo, L.; Sánchez-Martínez, D.; Sáenz-López, J.; Díaz-Coronel, D.; Polanco-Guerra, C.; Carrascal-Carrasquilla, O. Update on Alternatives for Postoperative Pain Control in Plastic Surgery. Rev. Chil. Anest. 2023, 52, 365–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Spencer-Jones, J.; Luxton, T.; Bond, S.E.; Sandoe, J. Feasibility, Effectiveness and Safety of Elastomeric Pumps for Delivery of Antibiotics to Adult Hospital Inpatients—A Systematic Review. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lee, P. Infusion Pump development and Implications for Nurses. Br. J. Nurs. 2015, 24, S30–S37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. McCutcheon, J.R.; Elimelech, M. Modeling Water Flux in Forward Osmosis: Implications for Improved Membrane Design. AIChE J. 2007, 53, 1736–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Gómez-Pastora, J.; Dominguez, S.; Bringas, E.; Rivero, M.J.; Ortiz, I.; Dionysiou, D.D. Review and Perspectives on the Use of Magnetic Nanophotocatalysts (MNPCs) in Water Treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 310, 407–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. González-Fernández, C.; Gómez-Pastora, J.; Bringas, E.; Zborowski, M.; Chalmers, J.J.; Ortiz, I. Recovery of Magnetic Catalysts: Advanced Design for Process Intensification. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021, 60, 16780–16790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Li, J.; Gonzales, R.R.; Takagi, R.; Chen, Y.C.; Matsuoka, A.; Deng, L.; Matsuyama, H. Continuous Purification of Drugs by Ionic Liquid-Drawn Organic Solvent Forward Osmosis and Solute Recovery. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2023, 22, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Takada, R.; Takagi, R.; Matsuyama, H. High-Degree Concentration Organic Solvent Forward Osmosis for Pharmaceutical Pre-Concentration. Membranes 2024, 14, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Cui, Y.; Chung, T.S. Pharmaceutical Concentration Using Organic Solvent Forward Osmosis for Solvent Recovery. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Goh, K.S.; Chen, Y.; Ng, D.Y.F.; Chew, J.W.; Wang, R. Organic Solvent Forward Osmosis Membranes for Pharmaceutical Concentration. J. Memb. Sci. 2022, 642, 119965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. González-Fernández, C.; Ciannella, S.; Bringas, E.; Ortiz, I.; Gómez-Pastora, J. Chemical and Biological Methods for the Synthesis of Magnetic Nanoparticles. In Magnetic Nanoparticles in Nanomedicine; Kai, W., Jian-Ping, W., Eds.; Elsevier: Cambridge, MA, USA; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2024; pp. 115–134. ISBN 9780443216688. [Google Scholar]
Sensors 24 07042 g001
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of an elementary osmotic pump (EOP).
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of an elementary osmotic pump (EOP).
Sensors 24 07042 g001
Sensors 24 07042 g002
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of a push–pull osmotic pump (PPOP).
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of a push–pull osmotic pump (PPOP).
Sensors 24 07042 g002
Sensors 24 07042 g003
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of a controlled porosity osmotic pump (CPOP).
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of a controlled porosity osmotic pump (CPOP).
Sensors 24 07042 g003
Sensors 24 07042 g004
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of a Higuchi–Theeuwes pump (HTP) [37].
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of a Higuchi–Theeuwes pump (HTP) [37].
Sensors 24 07042 g004
Sensors 24 07042 g005
Figure 5. Scheme of the FO process: (1) FO process at the initial stage and (2) FO process at equilibrium.
Figure 5. Scheme of the FO process: (1) FO process at the initial stage and (2) FO process at equilibrium.
Sensors 24 07042 g005
Sensors 24 07042 g006
Figure 6. Scheme of the FO process: (1) FO process with a conventional DS and (2) FO process with MNPs as the DS.
Figure 6. Scheme of the FO process: (1) FO process with a conventional DS and (2) FO process with MNPs as the DS.
Sensors 24 07042 g006
Sensors 24 07042 g007
Figure 7. Scheme of an external wearable device for drug delivery based on the integration of osmotic pumps and MNPs: (1) wearable device at the initial stage and (2) wearable device during drug delivery.
Figure 7. Scheme of an external wearable device for drug delivery based on the integration of osmotic pumps and MNPs: (1) wearable device at the initial stage and (2) wearable device during drug delivery.
Sensors 24 07042 g007
Sensors 24 07042 g008
Figure 8. Scheme of an extracorporeal device for drug delivery: (1) extracorporeal device at the initial stage, (2) extracorporeal device after it has been used, and (3) regeneration step of the extracorporeal device.
Figure 8. Scheme of an extracorporeal device for drug delivery: (1) extracorporeal device at the initial stage, (2) extracorporeal device after it has been used, and (3) regeneration step of the extracorporeal device.
Sensors 24 07042 g008
Sensors 24 07042 g009
Figure 9. CP in an FO process in an asymmetrical membrane with the FS facing the active layer.
Figure 9. CP in an FO process in an asymmetrical membrane with the FS facing the active layer.
Sensors 24 07042 g009
Sensors 24 07042 g010
Figure 10. ICP in the proposed drug delivery systems using (1) a dense membrane, (2) asymmetrical membrane with the FS facing the active layer, and (3) asymmetrical membrane with the FS facing the porous support layer.
Figure 10. ICP in the proposed drug delivery systems using (1) a dense membrane, (2) asymmetrical membrane with the FS facing the active layer, and (3) asymmetrical membrane with the FS facing the porous support layer.
Sensors 24 07042 g010
Sensors 24 07042 g011
Figure 11. Scheme of an FO process with MNPs as the DS for the concentration of active pharmaceutical ingredients in the pharmaceutical industry.
Figure 11. Scheme of an FO process with MNPs as the DS for the concentration of active pharmaceutical ingredients in the pharmaceutical industry.
Sensors 24 07042 g011
Sensors 24 07042 g012
Figure 12. Scheme of the synthesis of an active pharmaceutical compound using a dosing pump based on the integration of osmotic pump and MNPs.
Figure 12. Scheme of the synthesis of an active pharmaceutical compound using a dosing pump based on the integration of osmotic pump and MNPs.
Sensors 24 07042 g012
Table 1. Examples of commercial drugs based on osmotic pumps.
Table 1. Examples of commercial drugs based on osmotic pumps.
DrugActive IngredientApplicationRef.
Actoplus Met XR (Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company, Tokyo, Japan)Pioglitazone
and metformin
hydrochloride		Glycaemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus[42]
Adalat Oros
(Bayer, Leverkusen,
Germany)		NifedipineAngina and hypertension[43]
Concerta®
(Janssen
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Beerse, Belgium)		Methylphenidate
hydrochloride		Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder[44]
Ditropan XL®
(Janssen
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Beerse, Belgium)		Oxybutynin chlorideOveractive bladder[45]
Elafax® XR
(Gador S.A.,
Bueno Aires, Argentina)		VenlafaxineMajor depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and panic disorder[46]
Glucotrol XL
(Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA) 		GlipizideImprove glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus[47]
Osmolex ERTM
(Supernus
Pharmaceuticals,
Rockville, MD, USA)		Amantadine
hydrochloride		Parkinson’s disease and drug-induced extrapyramidal
reactions in adults 		[48]
Procardia XL®
(Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA)		NifedipineAngina and hypertension[49]
Table 2. Summary of the most recent studies related to osmotic pumps.
Table 2. Summary of the most recent studies related to osmotic pumps.
Osmotic SystemOsmotic AgentAdministrationActive Ingredient_targetRef.
CPOPPotassium chloride and mannitolOralPaliperidone-[34]
Lactose
monohydrate and fructose		Enalapril maleate-[9]
EOPHydroxypropyl
methylcelluloses		Diltiazem
hydrochloride		-[11]
Sodium chlorideValganciclovir HClBeagle dogs[12]
PPOPDiltiazem, ambroxol, paracetamol, etc.-[10]
EOPMannitol with
polyethylene oxide		Implanted on the
jugular vein		Fenofibrate-loaded solid lipid coating +
LDL antibodies		White pigs[50]
HTP *Sodium chlorideImplanted
subcutaneously		PDE8 inhibitorC57BL/6 mice[39,51]
HTP * Model 1002Implanted
subcutaneously and linked to the
ventricle		tcDNAMdx52 mice[41,51]
HTP * Model 1004Implanted in the right earFluvastatinCBA/CaJ mice[38,51]
HTP * Model 2001Implanted
subcutaneously		MeloxicamPigeons[19,51]
HTP * Model 2006Angiotensin IIMst1−/− and C57BL/6 wild-type mice[40,51]
HTP * Model 2006Implanted in the left earArtificial perilymphGuinea pigs[51,52]
HTP * Model 2ML4Implanted
subcutaneously in the lumbar area		Isoform FS-288Sprague–Dawley rats[51,53]
HTP * Model AP2004Implanted
subcutaneously		Angiotensin IIApoe−/−[51,54]
HTP * Model 2002Connected to the
neurite outgrowth chamber		Neurotrophin-33D-printed neurite
outgrowth chamber		[51,55]
* (ALZET®, Durect Corporation, Cupertino, CA, USA).
Table 3. Summary of studies using MNPs as the DS in the FO process.
Table 3. Summary of studies using MNPs as the DS in the FO process.
Particles and
Coating/Functionalization		MNP Synthesis MethodParticle Size (nm)FO MembraneDraw
Solution		Osmotic
Pressure
(bars)		Feed
Solution		Water
Flux
(LMH)		Reverse
Solute Flux
(gMH)		MNP Recovery MethodSaturated Mass
Magnetization (emu·g−1)		RecoveryRef.
MNPs coated/functionalized with organic acids and their derivatives
Citric acid-coated MNPsCo-precipitation3–7AIM™ HFFO membrane
(Aquaporin A/S, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark); A = 180.0 cm2		3.70% (w/w)18.7Deionized
water		9.20.08-44.0-[67]
40Polyethersulfone thin film
composite FO membranes		600.00 g·L−180.03.5% (w/w) NaCl8.5>0.10Magnetic field and
nanofiltration		60.0≈100.0%
t = 10 min		[68]
Dehydroascorbic acid-coated MNPs20Cellulose triacetate/
cellulose acetate FO
membrane; A = 40.0 cm2		0.06 g·L−1-Deionized
water		6.0-Magnetic field77.7≈100.0%[69]
Multicoated MNPs with polyacrylic acid as a
terminal hydrophilic
ligand		12AIM™ HFFO
(Aquaporin A/S, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark); A = 180.0 cm2		0.60%8.94.1--67.6%[58]
Polyacrylic acid-coated MNPsMicrowave
irradiation and co-precipitation		7AIM™ HFFO module
(Aquaporin A/S, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark); A = 180.0 cm2		0.70%12.88.1-19.4≈100.0%[56]
Thermal
decomposition		8–30Cellulose triacetate FO
membrane
(Hydration Tech. Innovations,
Albany, OR, USA); A = 20.0 cm2		0.08 M-13.9--≈100.0%[70]
35 g·L−1 NaCl6.3
5Commercial FO membrane
(Hydration Tech. Innovations,
Albany, OR, USA); A = 8.0 cm2		0.08 M70.9Deionized
water		12.0-Ultrafiltration-≈100.0%[71]
3.5% (w/w) NaCl3.0
20–300.05 M-Deionized
water		7.7-Magnetic field-≈100.0%[72]
Polyethylene glycol
dicarboxylic acid-
functionalized SiO2-coated MNPs		-FO membrane
(Aquaporin A/S, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark); A = 31.0 cm2		8.00 g·L−1-40 mg·L−1 NaCl12.2-5.063.4%[15]
Poly-sodium acrylate-coated MNPsCo-precipitation520AIMTM membrane
(Aquaporin A/S, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark); A = 33.2 cm2		7.00%9Deionized
water		3.80.05-25.0-[73]
77–166Cellulose triacetate FO
membrane; A = 98.0 cm2		1.00% (w/w)1.3-----[74]
Poly-sodium acrylate-coated MNPsThermal
decomposition		7Specialized carbon nanotube FO membrane
(Porifera Inc., San Leandro, CA, USA); A = 42.0 cm2		0.07% (w/v)25.3Deionized
water		11.7-Magnetic field and heating-≈100.0%
t = 1–5 min		[75]
90.13% (w/w)11.45.3-Magnetic field-≈100.0%
t = 5 min		[76]
Sodium oleate-coated MNPsCo-precipitation32Cellulose triacetate magnetic
composite FO membrane;
A = 23.7 cm2		0.1 g·L−1-1.0 M NaCl11.4--84.4%[77]
Tri-sodium citrate-
functionalized SiO2-coated MNPs		20–40Cellulose triacetate FO
membrane; A = 14.0 cm2		80.00 g·L−1125.6Deionized
water		17.11.5032.7≈100.0%[66]
0.5 M NaCl2.7-
Tri-sodium citrate-coated MNPs66–69Cellulose triacetate FO
membrane
(Hydration Tech. Innovations,
Albany, OR, USA); A = 140.0 cm2		2.00 g·L−1-Deionized
water		34.7----[78]
3–8Cellulose triacetate FO
membrane
(Hydration Tech. Innovations,
Albany, OR, USA); A = 20.0 cm2		0.02 g·L−1-17.3----[79]
MNPs coated/functionalized with organic polymers
Chitosan-coated MNPsCo-precipitation20Cellulose triacetate/
cellulose acetate FO
membrane; A = 40.0 cm2		0.06 g·L−1-Deionized
water		5.0-Magnetic field70.3≈100.0%[69]
Hyperbranched
polyglycerol carboxylate-coated MNPs		Thermal
decomposition		29OsMem™
(Hydration Tech. Innovations,
Albany, OR, USA); A = 50.0 cm2		500.00 g·L−115.87.2-Ultrafiltration18.7≈100.0%[80]
Hyperbranched
polyglycerol-coated MNPs 		21300.00 g·L−115.26.2--20.7-[81]
Hyperbranched
polyglycerol-coated MNPs functionalized with succinic anhydride moieties		24OsMem™
(Hydration Tech. Innovations,
Albany, OR, USA); A = 2.4 cm2		400.00 g·L−19.73.0-Ultrafiltration19.3≈100.0%[82]
Magnetic poly
(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-sodium 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane
sulfonate) nanogels		Co-precipitation271Cellulose triacetate with an embedded polyester screen mesh FO membrane
(Hydration Tech. Innovations,
Albany, OR, USA); A = 23.0 cm2		100.00 g·L−13.30.6-Magnetic field and heating25.3≈100.0%
t = 20 min		[83]
Poly
(N-isopropylacrylamide)-coated MNPs		Thermal
decomposition		7Specialized carbon nanotube FO membrane
(Porifera Inc., San Leandro, CA, USA); A = 42.0 cm2		0.07%
(w/v)		25.311.7--≈100.0%
t = 1–5 min		[75]
Polyethylene glycol 4000- coated MNPsCo-precipitation-Cellulose triacetate FO
membrane
(Fluid Tech. Solutions, Inc.,
San José, CA, USA); A = 49.0 cm2		10.00 g·L−1-Deionized
water		14.9-Magnetic field-≈100.0%
t = 2 min		[65]
Polyethylene glycol-coated MNPsPolyol process9–32Cellulose triacetate FO
membrane
(Hydration Tech. Innovations,
Albany, OR, USA); A = 20.0 cm2		0.08 M-11.3--≈100.0%[70]
35 g·L−1 NaCl5.2
Polyethylene glycol
dicarboxylic -coated MNPs		Thermal
decomposition		13Flat sheet FO membrane
(Hydration Tech. Innovations,
Albany, OR, USA); A = 12.0 cm2		0.07 M73.9Deionized
water		9.1-35.5≈100.0%[84]
Poly(amidoamine)
dendrimer-coated MNPs		Co-precipitation17Thin film composite FO
membrane
(Porifera Inc., San Leandro, CA, USA); A = 42.0 cm2		30.00 g·L−1-12.9-48.0100.0%
t = 2 min		[14]
Poly(sodium styrene-4-sulfonate)-co-poly
(N-isopropylacrylamide)-coated MNPs		Thermal
decomposition		5Thin film composite FO
membrane
(Hydration Tech. Innovations,
Albany, OR, USA)		33.00% (w/w)55.7Deionized
water		14.9-Magnetic field, ultrafiltration, and heating11.1≈100.0%[85]
3.5% (w/w) NaCl2.7
Sodium alginate sulfate-functionalized SiO2-coated MNPsCo-precipitation63–76Cellulose triacetate
A = 14.0 cm2		60.00 g·L−1118.8Deionized
water		8.50.23Magnetic field50.6100.0%[86]
Triethylene glycol-coated MNPSThermal
decomposition		20Commercially FO membrane
(Hydration Tech. Innovations,
Albany, OR, USA); A = 8.0 cm2		0.20 M-6.0--20.0-[71]
MNPs coated/functionalized with polysaccharides
Dextran-coated MNPsCo-precipitation10Commercially FO membrane
(Hydration Tech. Innovations,
Albany, OR, USA); A = 48.0 cm2		0.50 M-Deionized
water		4.0-Magnetic field32.4≈100.0%
t = 10–15 min		[87]
2 g·L−1 MgSO43.0
D-Xylose-coated MNPsHydrothermal method-Commercial FO membrane
(Hydration Tech. Innovations,
Albany, OR, USA); A = 1.8 cm2		6.50% (w/v)1.5Deionized
water		2.9-30.0≈100.0%[88]
0.01 M NaCl1.3
Pectin-coated MNPsCo-precipitation390Polyamide FO membrane
(Porifera Inc., San Leandro, CA, USA); A = 12.6 cm2		0.50%-Deionized
water		26.6-18.6≈100.0%
t = 12–16 min		[89]
1% (w/w) NaCl6.6
MNPs coated/functionalized with other organic compounds
3-(Trimethoxysilyl) propyl methacrylate-functionalized SiO2-coated MNPsCo-precipitation and sol-gel method80Thin film composite FO
membrane; A = 4.9 cm2		--Deionized
water		10.2-Magnetic field44.2≈100.0%[90]
Poly (deep eutectic
solvent)-coated MNPs		Solvothermal
procedure		15–25Cellulose triacetate FO
membrane
(Hydration Tech. Innovations,
Albany, OR, USA); A = 15.0 cm2		3.50 g·L−168.917.90.1260.4≈100.0%[91]
Bare MNPs and MNPs coated/functionalized with inorganic compounds
Bare MNPsCo-precipitation10–20FTSH2O
(Porifera Inc., San Leandro, CA, USA); A = 42.0 cm2		---1.9----[16]
127Polyamide FO membrane
(Porifera Inc., San Leandro, CA, USA); A = 12.6 cm2		5.00% (w/w)-Deionized
water		35.7-Magnetic field3.8≈100.0%
t = 7 min		[92]
20 g·L−1 NaCl2.5
EDTA-functionalized SiO2-coated MNPsHydrothermal method 280Polyamide thin film composite FO membrane
(Porifera Inc., San Leandro, CA, USA); A = 20.0 cm2		60.00 g·L−1-0.5 g·L−1
octanoic acid		9.6-18.7>90.0%[59]
Potassium-functionalized iron oxide-doped carbon nanofiber MNPsCo-precipitation4500FTSH2O™
(Sterlitech Corporation, Auburn, WA, USA);
A = 42.0 cm2		0.10%
(w/v)		86.1Deionized
water		3.40.10-22.3-[20]
1.0 M NaCl2.1
SiO2-coated MNPsThermal
decomposition		-FO membrane
(Aquaporin A/S, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark); A = 31.0 cm2		8.00 g·L−1-40 mg·L−1 NaCl11.0-Magnetic field5.083.9%[15]
Table 4. Summary of the main differences between conventional drug delivery methods and the proposed drug delivery systems.
Table 4. Summary of the main differences between conventional drug delivery methods and the proposed drug delivery systems.
Disposable
Mechanical Pumps		Intravenous
Administration Systems		Wearable
Device		Extracorporeal Device
Type of systemExistingProposed
Transport××✓×
Reusability×✓✓✓
Independence of an energy source✓×✓✓
Independence of environmental factors×✓✓✓
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Navarro-Tumar, D.; García-Merino, B.; González-Fernández, C.; Ortiz, I.; San-Román, M.-F.; Bringas, E. Novel Applications in Controlled Drug Delivery Systems by Integrating Osmotic Pumps and Magnetic Nanoparticles. Sensors 2024, 24, 7042. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24217042

AMA Style

Navarro-Tumar D, García-Merino B, González-Fernández C, Ortiz I, San-Román M-F, Bringas E. Novel Applications in Controlled Drug Delivery Systems by Integrating Osmotic Pumps and Magnetic Nanoparticles. Sensors. 2024; 24(21):7042. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24217042

Chicago/Turabian Style

Navarro-Tumar, David, Belén García-Merino, Cristina González-Fernández, Inmaculada Ortiz, Ma.-Fresnedo San-Román, and Eugenio Bringas. 2024. "Novel Applications in Controlled Drug Delivery Systems by Integrating Osmotic Pumps and Magnetic Nanoparticles" Sensors 24, no. 21: 7042. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24217042

APA Style

Navarro-Tumar, D., García-Merino, B., González-Fernández, C., Ortiz, I., San-Román, M.-F., & Bringas, E. (2024). Novel Applications in Controlled Drug Delivery Systems by Integrating Osmotic Pumps and Magnetic Nanoparticles. Sensors, 24(21), 7042. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24217042

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop
  NODES
admin 19
Association 2
Idea 4
idea 4
innovation 20
INTERN 33
Note 13
Project 4
twitter 1