Discussion
We observed that approximately 50% of subjects in this cohort with newly diagnosed T2DM had _target organ/system damage if the latter was searched in-depth with several techniques, including ultrasonography scanning of carotid and lower limb arteries, comprehensive neurological evaluation and ophthalmoscopy. Focusing on microvascular complications (eye, kidney, nerves), test abnormalities compatible with neuropathy were more common than those documenting retinopathy or nephropathy. This observation is noteworthy as neuropathy is often a neglected microvascular complication of diabetes because the eye and the kidney generally receive more attention than nerves. Overall, as many as 40% of subjects had microvascular disease, with a proportion twofold higher than macrovascular disease. Noteworthy, as many as 10% had both microvascular and macrovascular damage and as many as ~50% had either.
We have observed that gender, age, BMI, smoking, HbA1c and hypertension were variably associated with specific microvascular complications and gender, age, smoking and hypertension were associated with macrovascular complications. Interestingly, male gender was associated with CVD whereas female gender was associated with CKD. A classic risk factor such as hypercholesterolemia was not associated with macrovascular complications and hypertension was not associated with CKD. The cross-sectional setting of the study is the likely explanation. Yet, almost all subjects were on statins or had cholesterol levels above the cut-off of 70 mg/dL and the majority of hypertensive subjects were on treatment.
Insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion were negatively associated with macrovascular complications. In previous longitudinal studies, we found that insulin resistance was a predictor of CVD in T2DM and in the general population.27 28 In a study conducted several years ago in the UK, Roy Chowdhury et al29 observed an association between impaired insulin secretion and retinopathy but no association of this complication with insulin sensitivity. However, they used different and surrogate methods (eg, Homeostasis Model Assessment) to assess insulin secretion and sensitivity. Martinell et al11 observed an inverse association between insulin secretion and retinopathy and no association with insulin resistance. However, they have used surrogate methods to assess these metabolic functions. We were unable to observed any association of insulin secretion with microvascular disease.
In this study, we explored virtually all classic sites of chronic complications (heart, arteries, eye, kidney, nerves) and this is at variance with most previous studies, some of which are also quite dated. In these studies, conducted in the last 40 years in large cohorts of patients with newly diagnosed T2DM recruited in Western countries, the prevalence of complications was quite variable, most likely for substantial differences in the methods of their detection.2–16 Prevalence of retinopathy ranged from 1%4 to 21%.2 Prevalence of DSPN ranged from 3%13 to 42%.16 Prevalence of microalbuminuria/macroalbuminuria ranged from 7%3 to 20%.10 CKD was observed in 3%2 13 up to 21%.9 In these studies, prior cardiovascular events were often presented separately: myocardial infarction ranged from 5%13 to 11%,12 stroke ranged from 2%10 to 5%,8 peripheral vascular disease ranged from 2%4 14 to 40%.8 In none of these studies, carotid or lower limb ultrasonography were used to detect plaques and only one of them explored CAN, finding a prevalence of 4%.16 Therefore, we feel that our study is more comprehensive than those previous studies.
Multivariate analyses were run only in few of the above referenced studies. Looker et al5 found associations of retinopathy with male gender, HbA1c, BMI and blood pressure. An association of retinopathy with male gender, HbA1c and blood pressure was observed also by Kostev and Rathmann.6 Kostev et al8 have reported that DSPN was associated with male gender and age. Interestingly, we found an association between smoking and neuropathy (both DSPN and CAN). This finding is consistent with recent data from others30 31 and could be attributed to the damage exerted by smoking on vasa nervorum as well as its direct detrimental effects on nerve structure and function. The latter includes an increased oxidative stress, with reactive oxygen species and Advanced Glycosilation End-Products as mediators, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation, DNA damage and apoptosis.32 33 The lack of significant associations of HbA1c with some of the complications (eg, neuropathy or retinopathy) is reasonably due to the cross-sectional design of the study.
As far as we know, this is the only study exploring in the same cohort all major complications of diabetes and relating them to classic risk factors and to major pathogenic determinants of T2DM (ie, insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction). We feel that our data are important as they point out to what extent the diabetes milieu can deteriorate health status of subjects before diagnosis even in the presence of mild-to-moderate hyperglycemia and how often chronic complications might be detected at time of diabetes diagnosis if they are carefully and comprehensively searched. This happens despite the increased awareness for diabetes occurred in the last 20–30 years. Yet, a role of insulin resistance in macrovascular disease emerged independently of classic risk factors, thus consolidating previous findings in subjects with and without diabetes.27 29
Strengths of the study are: large number of subjects; no selection of patients (only those older than 75 years were not examined); exclusion of patients with Latent Autoimmune Diabetes of Adults; lack of any interference by antihyperglycemic drugs; assessment of all major organs/systems suffering from chronic hyperglycemia, including autonomic nervous system; investigation of carotid and lower limb arteries and not solely of prior CVD clinical events; measurement of insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion with state-of-the-art techniques.
Limits of the study are: inclusion of Caucasian subjects only; lack of investigation of CHD with dynamic techniques (eg, stress ECG or stress echocardiography).
In conclusion, despite a generally earlier diagnosis of T2DM occurring in the last two decades as compared with previous decades for an increased awareness of the disease, as many as ~50% of newly diagnosed patients have clinical or preclinical manifestations of microvascular and/or macrovascular disease. Our findings might promote an additional effort to further anticipate T2DM diagnosis by tracing undetected cases. Yet, our study might translate into a stronger commitment for staging organ/system damage in T2DM as soon as the diagnosis is established.