Gyromagnetic ratio

In physics, the gyromagnetic ratio (also sometimes known as the magnetogyric ratio in other disciplines) of a particle or system is the ratio of its magnetic moment to its angular momentum, and it is often denoted by the symbol γ, gamma. Its SI unit is the radian per second per tesla (rad⋅s⁻¹⋅T⁻¹) or, equivalently, the coulomb per kilogram (C⋅kg⁻¹).

The term "gyromagnetic ratio" is often used as a synonym for a different but closely related quantity, the g-factor. The g-factor only differs from the gyromagnetic ratio in being dimensionless.

For a classical rotating body

Consider a nonconductive charged body rotating about an axis of symmetry. According to the laws of classical physics, it has both a magnetic dipole moment due to the movement of charge and an angular momentum due to the movement of mass arising from its rotation. It can be shown that as long as its charge and mass density and flow are distributed identically and rotationally symmetric, its gyromagnetic ratio is

$\gamma ={\frac {q}{2m}}$

where ${q}$ is its charge and ${m}$ is its mass.

The derivation of this relation is as follows. It suffices to demonstrate this for an infinitesimally narrow circular ring within the body, as the general result then follows from an integration. Suppose the ring has radius r, area A = πr², mass m, charge q, and angular momentum L = mvr. Then the magnitude of the magnetic dipole moment is

$\mu =IA={\frac {qv}{2\pi r}}\,\pi r^{2}={\frac {q}{2m}}\,mvr={\frac {q}{2m}}L~.$

For an isolated electron

An isolated electron has an angular momentum and a magnetic moment resulting from its spin. While an electron's spin is sometimes visualized as a literal rotation about an axis, it cannot be attributed to mass distributed identically to the charge. The above classical relation does not hold, giving the wrong result by the absolute value of the electron's g-factor, which is denoted g_e: $$\gamma _{\mathrm {e} }={\frac {-e}{2m_{\mathrm {e} }}}\,|g_{\mathrm {e} }|={\frac {g_{\mathrm {e} }\mu _{\mathrm {B} }}{\hbar }}\,,$$ where μ_B is the Bohr magneton.

The gyromagnetic ratio due to electron spin is twice that due to the orbiting of an electron.

In the framework of relativistic quantum mechanics, $$g_{\mathrm {e} }=-2\left(1+{\frac {\alpha }{\,2\pi \,}}+\cdots \right)~,$$ where $\alpha$ is the fine-structure constant. Here the small corrections to the relativistic result g = 2 come from the quantum field theory calculations of the anomalous magnetic dipole moment. The electron g-factor is known to twelve decimal places by measuring the electron magnetic moment in a one-electron cyclotron: $$g_{\mathrm {e} }=-2.002\,319\,304\,361\,18(27).$$

The electron gyromagnetic ratio is $$\gamma _{\mathrm {e} }=\mathrm {-1.760\,859\,630\,23(53)\times 10^{11}\,rad{\cdot }s^{-1}{\cdot }T^{-1}}$$ $${\frac {\gamma _{\mathrm {e} }}{2\pi }}=\mathrm {-28\,024.951\,4242(85)\,MHz{\cdot }T^{-1}} .$$

The electron g-factor and γ are in excellent agreement with theory; see Precision tests of QED for details.

Gyromagnetic factor not as a consequence of relativity

Since a gyromagnetic factor equal to 2 follows from Dirac's equation, it is a frequent misconception to think that a g-factor 2 is a consequence of relativity; it is not. The factor 2 can be obtained from the linearization of both the Schrödinger equation and the relativistic Klein–Gordon equation (which leads to Dirac's). In both cases a 4-spinor is obtained and for both linearizations the g-factor is found to be equal to 2. Therefore, the factor 2 is a consequence of the minimal coupling and of the fact of having the same order of derivatives for space and time.

Physical spin-⁠1/2⁠ particles which cannot be described by the linear gauged Dirac equation satisfy the gauged Klein–Gordon equation extended by the g ⁠e/4⁠ σ^μν F_μν term according to,

$\left[\,\left(\partial ^{\mu }+i\,e\,A^{\mu }\right)\,\left(\partial _{\mu }+i\,e\,A_{\mu }\right)+g\,{\frac {e}{\,4\,}}\,\sigma ^{\mu \nu }\,F_{\mu \nu }+m^{2}\,\right]\;\psi \;=\;0~,\quad g\neq 2~.$

Here, ⁠1/2⁠σ^μν and F^μν stand for the Lorentz group generators in the Dirac space, and the electromagnetic tensor respectively, while A^μ is the electromagnetic four-potential. An example for such a particle is the spin ⁠1/2⁠ companion to spin ⁠3/2⁠ in the D^(½,1) ⊕ D^(1,½) representation space of the Lorentz group. This particle has been shown to be characterized by g = ⁠−+2/3⁠ and consequently to behave as a truly quadratic fermion.

For a nucleus

The sign of the gyromagnetic ratio, γ, determines the sense of precession. While the magnetic moments (the black arrows) are oriented the same for both cases of γ, the precession is in opposite directions. Spin and magnetic moment are in the same direction for γ > 0 (as for protons).

Protons, neutrons, and many nuclei carry nuclear spin, which gives rise to a gyromagnetic ratio as above. The ratio is conventionally written in terms of the proton mass and charge, even for neutrons and for other nuclei, for the sake of simplicity and consistency. The formula is:

$\gamma _{\text{n}}={\frac {e}{\,2m_{\text{p}}\,}}\,g_{\rm {n}}=g_{\rm {n}}\,{\frac {\,\mu _{\mathrm {N} }\,}{\hbar }}~,$

where $\mu _{\mathrm {N} }$ is the nuclear magneton, and $g_{\rm {n}}$ is the g-factor of the nucleon or nucleus in question. The ratio $\,{\frac {\gamma _{n}}{\,2\pi \,g_{\rm {n}}\,}}\,,$ equal to $\mu _{\mathrm {N} }/h$, is 7.622593285(47) MHz/T.

The gyromagnetic ratio of a nucleus plays a role in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These procedures rely on the fact that bulk magnetization due to nuclear spins precess in a magnetic field at a rate called the Larmor frequency, which is simply the product of the gyromagnetic ratio with the magnetic field strength. With this phenomenon, the sign of γ determines the sense (clockwise vs counterclockwise) of precession.

Most common nuclei such as ¹H and ¹³C have positive gyromagnetic ratios. Approximate values for some common nuclei are given in the table below.

Nucleus	$\gamma _{n}$ (106 rad⋅s−1⋅T−1)	$\gamma _{n}/(2\pi )$ (MHz⋅T−1)
1H	267.52218708(11)	42.577478461(18)
1H (in H2O)	267.5153194(11)	42.57638543(17)
2H	41.065	6.536
3H	285.3508	45.415
3He	−203.78946078(18)	−32.434100033(28)
7Li	103.962	16.546
13C	67.2828	10.7084
14N	19.331	3.077
15N	−27.116	−4.316
17O	−36.264	−5.772
19F	251.815	40.078
23Na	70.761	11.262
27Al	69.763	11.103
29Si	−53.190	−8.465
31P	108.291	17.235
57Fe	8.681	1.382
63Cu	71.118	11.319
67Zn	16.767	2.669
129Xe	−73.995401(2)	−11.7767338(3)

Larmor precession

Main article: Larmor precession

Any free system with a constant gyromagnetic ratio, such as a rigid system of charges, a nucleus, or an electron, when placed in an external magnetic field B (measured in teslas) that is not aligned with its magnetic moment, will precess at a frequency f (measured in hertz) proportional to the external field:

$f={\frac {\gamma }{2\pi }}B.$

For this reason, values of ⁠γ/ 2π ⁠, in units of hertz per tesla (Hz/T), are often quoted instead of γ.

Heuristic derivation

The derivation of this ratio is as follows: First we must prove the torque resulting from subjecting a magnetic moment $\mathbf {m}$ to a magnetic field $\mathbf {B}$ is $\,{\boldsymbol {\mathrm {T} }}=\mathbf {m} \times \mathbf {B} \,.$ The identity of the functional form of the stationary electric and magnetic fields has led to defining the magnitude of the magnetic dipole moment equally well as $m=I\pi r^{2}$, or in the following way, imitating the moment p of an electric dipole: The magnetic dipole can be represented by a needle of a compass with fictitious magnetic charges $\pm q_{\rm {m}}$ on the two poles and vector distance between the poles $\mathbf {d}$ under the influence of the magnetic field of earth $\,\mathbf {B} \,.$ By classical mechanics the torque on this needle is $\,{\boldsymbol {\mathrm {T} }}=q_{\rm {m}}(\mathbf {d} \times \mathbf {B} )\,.$ But as previously stated $\,q_{\rm {m}}\mathbf {d} =I\pi r^{2}{\hat {\mathbf {d} }}=\mathbf {m} \,,$ so the desired formula comes up. ${\hat {\mathbf {d} }}$ is the unit distance vector.

The spinning electron model here is analogous to a gyroscope. For any rotating body the rate of change of the angular momentum $\,\mathbf {J} \,$ equals the applied torque $\mathbf {T}$:

${\frac {d\mathbf {J} }{dt}}=\mathbf {T} ~.$

Note as an example the precession of a gyroscope. The earth's gravitational attraction applies a force or torque to the gyroscope in the vertical direction, and the angular momentum vector along the axis of the gyroscope rotates slowly about a vertical line through the pivot. In place of a gyroscope, imagine a sphere spinning around the axis with its center on the pivot of the gyroscope, and along the axis of the gyroscope two oppositely directed vectors both originated in the center of the sphere, upwards $\mathbf {J}$ and downwards $\mathbf {m} .$ Replace the gravity with a magnetic flux density $\,\mathbf {B} ~.$

${\frac {\,\operatorname {d} \mathbf {J} \,}{\,\operatorname {d} t\,}}$ represents the linear velocity of the pike of the arrow $\,\mathbf {J} \,$ along a circle whose radius is $\,J\sin {\phi }\,,$ where $\,\phi \,$ is the angle between $\,\mathbf {J} \,$ and the vertical. Hence the angular velocity of the rotation of the spin is

$\omega =2\pi \,f={\frac {1}{\,J\,\sin {\phi }\,}}\,\left|{\frac {\,{\rm {{d}\,\mathbf {J} \,}}}{\,{\rm {{d}\,t\,}}}}\right|={\frac {\,\left|\mathbf {T} \right|\,}{\,J\,\sin {\phi }\,}}={\frac {\,\left|\mathbf {m} \times \mathbf {B} \right|\,}{\,J\,\sin {\phi }\,}}={\frac {\,m\,B\sin {\phi }\,}{\,J\,\sin {\phi }\,}}={\frac {\,m\,B\,}{J}}=\gamma \,B~.$

Consequently, $f={\frac {\gamma }{\,2\pi \,}}\,B~.\quad {\text{q.e.d.}}$

This relationship also explains an apparent contradiction between the two equivalent terms, gyromagnetic ratio versus magnetogyric ratio: whereas it is a ratio of a magnetic property (i.e. dipole moment) to a gyric (rotational, from Greek: γύρος, "turn") property (i.e. angular momentum), it is also, at the same time, a ratio between the angular precession frequency (another gyric property) ω = 2πf and the magnetic field.

The angular precession frequency has an important physical meaning: It is the angular cyclotron frequency, the resonance frequency of an ionized plasma being under the influence of a static finite magnetic field, when we superimpose a high frequency electromagnetic field.

See also

• Charge-to-mass ratio
• Chemical shift
• Landé g-factor
• Larmor equation
• Proton gyromagnetic ratio