User contributions for HyperEntity

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

16:1016:10, 2 November 2012 diff hist −1,050 William Lane Craig →Debates: Stop lying. You're violating Wikipedia's guidelines on neutrality and you put its reputation at risk with the publication of libellous material. You also show yourself to be dishonest propagandist.

20:1920:19, 4 August 2012 diff hist +1,129 Talk:William Lane Craig →Dawkins again

11:3811:38, 3 August 2012 diff hist −180 Talk:William Lane Craig →Dawkins again
11:3411:34, 3 August 2012 diff hist +581 Talk:William Lane Craig →Dawkins again
00:2400:24, 3 August 2012 diff hist +736 Talk:William Lane Craig →Dawkins again

21:3921:39, 2 August 2012 diff hist +824 Talk:William Lane Craig →Dawkins again

14:2914:29, 1 August 2012 diff hist −2 William Lane Craig →Debates
14:2814:28, 1 August 2012 diff hist −553 William Lane Craig →Debates
14:2514:25, 1 August 2012 diff hist +264 Talk:William Lane Craig →Dawkins again
09:4909:49, 1 August 2012 diff hist +277 Talk:Ontological argument →Dawkins
09:3809:38, 1 August 2012 diff hist +433 Talk:William Lane Craig →Dawkins again
02:4302:43, 1 August 2012 diff hist +883 Talk:William Lane Craig →Dawkins again
02:0402:04, 1 August 2012 diff hist +3 Talk:William Lane Craig No edit summary
01:3601:36, 1 August 2012 diff hist −549 Ontological argument →Other criticisms: That you require consensus to remove this absurdity is deeply worrying. See comments on the talk page. Please do not revert this edit as you are vandalising this article and ruining the respectability of this site by doing so.
01:3001:30, 1 August 2012 diff hist +615 Talk:Ontological argument →Dawkins
00:4900:49, 1 August 2012 diff hist +1,788 Talk:William Lane Craig →Dawkins again

17:0417:04, 29 July 2012 diff hist +1,243 Talk:William Lane Craig →Dawkins again
16:5716:57, 29 July 2012 diff hist +627 William Lane Craig RD's 'general policy' is not mentioned in the source. What is mentioned is a very specific criticism of Craig which merits a response per Wiki NPOV guidelines. See my response on the talk page.
16:2016:20, 29 July 2012 diff hist −993 Talk:William Lane Craig →Dawkins again
16:1916:19, 29 July 2012 diff hist +993 Talk:William Lane Craig →Dawkins again
16:0316:03, 29 July 2012 diff hist +596 Talk:William Lane Craig →Views on homosexuality
15:4815:48, 29 July 2012 diff hist +627 William Lane Craig The conclusion of our last discussion was to exclude the Dawkins affair entirely. We can't have criticism (or personal attacks in this case) of Craig without a response (NPOV and all that-see my comments on the talk page).
15:3615:36, 29 July 2012 diff hist +1,778 Talk:William Lane Craig →Views on homosexuality
14:3414:34, 29 July 2012 diff hist +1,185 Talk:William Lane Craig →Views on homosexuality
13:3213:32, 29 July 2012 diff hist −8 William Lane Craig →Debates
13:2713:27, 29 July 2012 diff hist +478 William Lane Craig →Debates: Genocide was not mentioned in the article cited. The current edit represents a more honest and accurate description of its general tone. I've also tried to improve overall flow (e.g. overuse of 'prominent', over long opening etc).
12:4312:43, 29 July 2012 diff hist −549 Ontological argument →Other criticisms: The inclusion of Dawkins adds nothing whatsoever to this piece. This obvious to anyone who has read and understood this article. Please do not revert this edit.

22:2922:29, 1 July 2012 diff hist −23 William Lane Craig No edit summary
22:1922:19, 1 July 2012 diff hist −467 William Lane Craig →Apologetics: How does he use the Shroud of Turin? This statement us so vague that it is useless to the lay reader or the informed reader who is not aware of Craig's work.
21:3521:35, 1 July 2012 diff hist +34 William Lane Craig →Apologetics: Improved the structure and flow of the section. It clearly makes more sense to start with what Craig has done rather than a bunch of quotes singing his praises.
21:1121:11, 1 July 2012 diff hist −398 William Lane Craig →Other views: YouTube is not a reliable source and we try to avoid using it. Secondly, this is not a trivia page. It is designed to provide information about Craig's professional life not about every single opinion he holds.
21:0521:05, 1 July 2012 diff hist −2,698 William Lane Craig →Debates: I have improved the flow of the section and removed the clutter. You are also violating consensus-this was discussed with you before and we decided not to include the Dawkins affair. Please do not revert this edit.
12:1112:11, 1 July 2012 diff hist −2,697 William Lane Craig →Debates: The transcribed versions of his debates can be added to bibliography-mentioning it here is just clutter. The Dawkins affair has been discussed before-you are going against consensus. Be sure to add sources for Carrier and Price.

21:5121:51, 13 June 2012 diff hist −544 Ontological argument This is article is here to provide information on a philosophical argument. It is not a trivia page. Dawkins adds nothing whatsoever to it.

21:2421:24, 19 March 2012 diff hist +14 William Lane Craig I see no POV in 'Craig is a prolific debater'. It's factual statement. Anyway, I've changed it to something that conveys the original point.
21:1021:10, 19 March 2012 diff hist +489 Talk:William Lane Craig No edit summary

20:2820:28, 15 March 2012 diff hist +187 William Lane Craig →Debates: This link directs you to the sponser of the Dennett/Craig debate. It states that Craig presented a lecture and Dennett commented on it. It contains a link to the debate. There is no 404-I had no problem opening it. Cheers!