Talk:2014 Isla Vista killings
Latest comment: 17 days ago by Shoot for the Stars in topic Photo
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2014 Isla Vista killings article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | A news item involving 2014 Isla Vista killings was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 26 May 2014. |  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Elliot Rodger manifesto.jpg
Doesn't the photo violate the copyright of Rodger's estate? It's clearly not uploaded as being fair use Trade (talk) 22:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Trade It was sent to me by the Santa Barabara Sheriff's Office via FOIA request. The picture I was sent was the printed 137-page version the Santa Barbara Police found in his apartment in his room. The Santa Barbara Sheriff's Office took the photo and it was sent to me by them. If you look at the original photo I uploaded, it literally shows the printed version of his manifesto being submitted into evidence by the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Office. How does it violate copyright when they are the ones who own the copyright of this evidence, and the reason explicitly says it was sent by them? And how does a mass murderer leave behind an estate? I have never of that before ever. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 23:14, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Estates magically doesn't magically dissapear once people commit a crime. That would be silly Trade (talk) 23:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Rather than removing the photo i have moved the discussion to Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2024 November 10. Feel free to comment there @Shoot for the Stars:--Trade (talk) 23:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- Trade I have nominated the file for deletion. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 00:10, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Trade It was sent to me by the Santa Barabara Sheriff's Office via FOIA request. The picture I was sent was the printed 137-page version the Santa Barbara Police found in his apartment in his room. The Santa Barbara Sheriff's Office took the photo and it was sent to me by them. If you look at the original photo I uploaded, it literally shows the printed version of his manifesto being submitted into evidence by the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Office. How does it violate copyright when they are the ones who own the copyright of this evidence, and the reason explicitly says it was sent by them? And how does a mass murderer leave behind an estate? I have never of that before ever. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 23:14, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Katherine "Katie" Breann Cooper has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 10 § Katherine "Katie" Breann Cooper until a consensus is reached. Blethering Scot 22:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Photo
The photo at the top of the page shows, mainly, half empty bike racks. I don't think it's a good representation of the memorial service and there is a better photo further down in the article. Does anyone have an objection to these photos being swapped over? It's also used on this page Misogynist terrorism. Blackballnz (talk) 00:35, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- The photo on top is perfectly fine. If you look closer it literally shows dozens of people attending a vigil. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 07:41, 7 December 2024 (UTC)