Talk:2024 Wayanad landslides

Latest comment: 1 month ago by 117.230.90.207 in topic Wayanad landsiled
Former good article2024 Wayanad landslides was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 21, 2024Good article nomineeListed
August 22, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Launchballer talk 07:50, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

[[File:|140px|The drone visual of the landslide origin near Punjirimattom ]]
The drone visual of the landslide origin near Punjirimattom
  • ... that more than 420 people were killed in 2024 Wayanad landslides in India, caused by 572 mm (22.5 in) downpour within just 48 hours, which was above monthly average 527 mm (20.7 in) in the area?
  • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Chin pin choo (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Chin pin choo (talk) 12:53, 21 August 2024 (UTC).Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: The classic self-review. CMD (talk) 15:35, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
As outlined at WT:GAN#Review needs looking at, there are significant issues with this article. The GA review lasted less than two hours. It did not check the sources as required by WP:GAN/I#R3, which might have picked up numerous issues of close paraphrasing/plagiarism. The article itself is riddled with grammar and spelling errors and poor prose; it also contains unnecessary details in many sections. It thus fails several of the GA criteria.
Pinging those who commented at WT:GAN: Thebiguglyalien, Chipmunkdavis, Chaotic Enby ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Delist. Fails criteria 1a (many, many grammar errors), 1b (lead is way too short, also external links in body), 5 (very recent event, and the rescue operation is still current), and 6b (two galleries of dubious relevance). The long tables of individual donors also likely fail 1b (list incorporation) and 3b (unnecessary details). I can see a lot of other issues with the article (flag icons in prose, really?), but I am not sure whether those are actually GA requirements. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 11:19, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Article has been delisted to work on quality of the content. Chin pin choo (talk) 12:53, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've blocked the GAN nominator and reviewer, both as sockpuppets of Makks2010 based on behavioral evidence. DanCherek (talk) 15:02, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Wayanad landsiled

edit

Intractuons,consequence,possible reasons,rehabilitation and help extendedgovenment response community support counslution 117.230.90.207 (talk) 05:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
COMMUNITY 1
Note 1
Project 24