This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThere seems to be content which has been blatantly removed from this article, e.g. diff. Relevant information in the history needs to be added back in. --Zven 20:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
AMP History
editIt's interesting that an organisation with such huge assets has no history reported here. I don't believe that $111 billion in assets fell out of the sky. Is the history unavailable? I guess the AMP keeps an eye on its public image, but it's also accountable to the shareholders, and taxpayers of Australia. Ern Malleyscrub (talk) 11:07, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- Although today not nothing on history, but an editor had placed a tag complaining plaintively of the lack of information prior to about 2000. I managed to add some history earlier than 2000 from an AMP page of the New Zealand part of the company, but not enough to justify removing the tag. No history information is available from the main site. This is the sort of non-controversial information someone in company headquarters could well be expected to provide and that, if suitably referenced, would survive other editors' scrutiny. Get with it AMP!Robert P. O'Shea (talk) 13:45, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
AMP Makeover!
editCan anyone update AMP's logo with the new one? AnimatedZebra (talk) 04:39, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Share Price History Section
editSuggest deletion of this section. There are better sources for accurate share price data than Wikipedia. Without a complete explanation of share splits and buybacks etc it is unrealistic to expect that picking a few spot prices over irregular timeframes will be informative Brycewhite (talk) 23:34, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed - I have removed it. There was also discussion at WP:AWNB#Including Share Price Information in Australian Company Articles --Scott Davis Talk 13:19, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Shareholders
editI believe all the shareholders listed are nominees, so are not the beneficial or the actual owners. ie. HSBC doesn't own 30% of AMP, it represents 30% of the beneficial owners. The infobox should either list the full names ie. HSBC Nominees Pty. Ltd. or whatever it is called or better yet remove the shareholders altogether as I don't think AMP has any substantial individual shareholders. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.184.190.3 (talk) 05:39, 20 January 2019 (UTC)