Talk:Armstrong Williams

Birthdate

Armstrong Williams writes that he was born in 1962 on his website http://www.armstrongwilliams.com/company — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.200.176.93 (talk) 21:00, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

on your TV show, THE BEGINNING TITLE

A is covering the ptinting of ??ime and Accountability. Aimed n Accountability. Needs to be moved over to read 2600:8805:9380:3C00:DD7:3489:C593:B650 (talk) 09:48, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Untitled

There is merged Disinfopedia information here; some note of the cross-history information should perhaps be made, as with any transwiki move. +sj + 18:44, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Why does the first sentence describe Williams as an African American commentator, as if that is what defines him. It seems racially biased.

Uhh.. he's described as African American because he's African American.

Added No Child Left Behind

I added basic information on the No Child Left Behind incident at the top of the article. Seems important enough. I can't believe it wasn't already in there. I didn't see any ref in the history. Anyone have issue with this?

--Sstrader 15:45, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Now I see that Reginaever deleted a great deal of information on Williams, including the original NCLB info. Does this need to be rolled back?

--Sstrader 17:50, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Armstrong Williams.jpg

Image:Armstrong Williams.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:16, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

why is this man controversial amongst black community?

From what I've seen, he seems to be talked about relatively more by the African American community. But the article does not state that he is black. Any explanation? Is he one of those very rare and almost always controversial persons, a black Republican?Bdell555 (talk) 03:43, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't believe that your question has any relevance to the article, or any issues involved with the article. It is speculative, presumptive and irrelevant. The talk section is not a forum for such questions. (Yakofujimato (talk) 07:08, 9 June 2011 (UTC))

NPOV

This article seems to have NPOV issues. This article is a BLP however it mainly focuses on no child left behind, not on the person.

Cloak&Dagger (talk) 06:17, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

I had asked the question about whether it was OK to include the NCLB incident (see section above). It seemed a notable enough controversy to include, but I wasn't sure on the intricacies of biographic info. --Sstrader (talk) 19:52, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

The section on NCLB seemed to me to be overly detailed and to take up too much space in relation to the rest of the article. I condensed it. I also thought it was weird that the section on his media career led off with the NCLB controversy, so I moved it down further in the article. SunCrow (talk) 04:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Howard Stirk Holdings LLC

I think Howard Stirk Holdings LLC should have it's own article and not redirect.--Wikipietime (talk) 01:10, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Armstrong Williams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130503102600/http://rightsidewire.com/2011/03/the-graham-williams-group/ to http://rightsidewire.com/2011/03/the-graham-williams-group/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:07, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Needs more sources

The article needs more sources, and I have added inline tags. SunCrow (talk) 04:30, 17 March 2019 (UTC)