Talk:Blank & Jones
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blank & Jones article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Biography
editIs it really appropriate for it to be taken from the Artist's Site?
Why not paraphrase it?
The Ronin 21:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
this does need to be edited for neutral content.
- No, it's not appropriate, but I'm miserable at paraphrasing, so I'm going to tag it =/ kaiti-sicle 04:18, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
This is a terrible, terrible entry which just reads like sleeve-liner notes from a 'best of' album. Total shite, get rid of it.
I agree: it is nothing but the usual PR rubbish. 193.28.194.12 (talk) 06:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Proposed Deletion
editI saw some talk here about this article's notability. It doesn't seem like anyone tried to establish notability, so I've added a 'prod' tag. If anyone has reliable third-party sources to establish this article's notability, please feel free to add them. Thanks! Tnxman307 (talk) 20:21, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
tyiuyiuy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.100.97.36 (talk) 15:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Relax edition 5
editLooks like a dead link — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.70.80.179 (talk) 10:28, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Blank & Jones. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509160354/http://www.blankandjones.com/2006e/index.html to http://www.blankandjones.com/2006e/index.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509160354/http://www.blankandjones.com/2006e/index.html to http://www.blankandjones.com/2006e/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:54, 4 November 2016 (UTC)