Cherry on Top (Bini song) is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
Latest comment: 5 days ago15 comments5 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that the music video of Cherry on Top reached over 2 million views within 24 hours and hit number one on YouTube Philippines for music and iTunes chart?
Cheers for the DYK and GAN! By WP:DYKPBR, the song being featured on the NBA should be in the article if we choose (ALT1). I can't choose and make a review among the three since I was the GA reviewer for this article. RFNirmala (talk) 04:48, 1 December 2024 (UTC).Reply
Overall: Looks good to me. Newly minted GA, and the DYK was timely filed. Earwig comes back clean, and the only real thing that stood out as a potential red flag was the WP:BROADWAYWORLD sources, but I don't think the article relies on any of them alone for any particular fact. Alt2 seems uninteresting (it is entirely expected that the group who wrote the song was the first one to perform it at a particular festival), while the Alt0 and Alt1 hook seem workable. There is a small mistake in Alt1 (The Clippers Spirit, a official dance team... should be the Clippers Spirit, the official dance team..., since the official name is "Clippers Spirit" and it's the official dance team), but I don't think that's a reason to hold this up, since that can be trivially fixed prior to promotion and after you read this comment. I'm inclined to go with Alt1 here after the fix is made, in line with the nominator's request. — Red-tailed hawk(nest)06:12, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hey Red! Thanks for looking at this DYK nom. I noticed your feedback for Alt2. Yes, an artist or a group is expected to perform their new song at a festival. However, the KCON festival is different from ordinary festivals. KCON is regarded as the world's largest convention and music festival for K-pop culture,[1] which features performances from various K-pop acts. Bini, on the other hand, is a Filipino group, and their performance in KCON was actually regarded by many sources as a historic milestone for the entire Philippine pop music community since they were the first Filipino act to ever perform in such a big festival as KCON (which is mainly for K-pop culture).[2][3]AstrooKai (Talk) 09:48, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
@AstrooKai: The way you've phrased it, and the way the article has it Later that month, on July 27, Bini performed the song at KCON 2024 in Los Angeles, which marked the first act by a Filipino pop group at the event seems more interesting; the way that the current alt was phrased isn't. Therefore, I'll propose Alt4:... that Bini performed "Cherry on Top" at KCON 2024, marking the first act by a Filipino pop group at the event?— Red-tailed hawk(nest)17:07, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
(The Clippers Spirit, a official dance team... should be the Clippers Spirit, the official dance team..., since the official name is "Clippers Spirit" and it's the official dance team)
Actually, @Royiswariii: Can you add reference to the dance team to the article? The cited fact has to be in the article; it is for Alt0, but I had forgot to check that for Alt1 until now. We can't run this if the hook fact isn't in the article. — Red-tailed hawk(nest)07:28, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Maybe change "critical reception" to "reception" and then add it there? It's not super simple to fit in based on current sectioning, but if you had a section that included both critics and general popular reception it would fit right in. — Red-tailed hawk(nest)08:23, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi, Roi! Thanks for putting this article up to FA nomination. I understand that you're having hard time understanding their recommendations. I have read their feedback so let me know if there's specific feedback by them that you don't understand, I will be happy to help.
Though I may only be able to help from time to time, since I am preparing for our research paper defense. But I will check Wikipedia occasionally, so feel free to drop your questions, I will try my best to reply them in a timely manner. AstrooKai (Talk) 11:16, 12 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, I understand that you gave a research paper defense, we just finished our research paper defense earlier too. I understand some of their suggestions but it was unclear or not specifically what should need to be change. RoyiswariiiTalk!11:23, 12 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
That's okay. I see you have already addressed SchroCat's suggestions regarding the footnotes for the Filipino terms in the music video section, which I also copyedited earlier. For the "MOS blimps", they're probably referring to some inconsistencies with styling in the article, or some MOS violations. I suggest waiting for them to reply.
As for Heartfox's suggestions, I will elaborate them below (I will only include those that has not been addressed yet):
"and its lyrical theme includes confidence" → suggest converting this to a separate sentence and expanding on it. a "lyrical theme" is something, it doesn't really "include" something
They're basically saying that this part in the lead section should be a sentence of its own and be elaborated or expanded further from there.
"with Bini members Colet and Maloi participating in the songwriting process" → this is confusing as we are previously told it was "Written by Boy Matthews and Gaby Ramirez". participation but not credited?
They're seeking clarification regarding this, since the two Bini members are not in the credits of the song. I think this is because of the fact that you said it as participating in the songwriting process. I haven't noticed this when I posted my reply, but I have now. Colet and Maloi weren't involved in the literal "songwriting" process, but rather on the creative process only. Meaning they only participated in the initial brainstorming of the song, such as its tunes, but they did not participated in writing its lyrics (which is songwriting).
"The song topped the iTunes Philippines Top Songs chart and became the top trending music video on YouTube, garnering two million views in less than 24 hours after its release." → Per WP:SINGLEVENDOR, we generally don't care about iTunes, especially as this song entered main Billboard charts for Philippines anyways. Ditto "culminating in topping Spotify's Daily Top Songs chart".
They want any information about the song's performance on iTunes and Spotify charts to be removed since they are generally unsuitable for inclusion per WP:SINGLEVENDOR, especially in the song's case since it already charted in Billboard Philippines, which has more weight than the iTunes and Spotify charts.
"On November 17, 2023, Bini released" → we need to pretend readers are starting the article at the body, as the lead summarizes rather than introduces. Right now there is no description of what Bini is like there is in the lead.
They basically want the Background section (if not the lead section) to begin with some detail about who Bini is, since there's no context about who Bini is in the article. Though this is new to me since Gento (song) by SB19, which is currently FA-rated, doesn't have this kind of practice in the article. I suggest you bringing this up to them and wait for their feedback.
I find the background section lacking as it mostly focuses on past commercial successes rather than including a sense of artistry, vision, personal life, recording career, etc.
Same as the above—context about who Bini is.
The music video section generally doesn't come after the composition section.
The section should be placed further lower in the article, probably under Promotion and release. This is basically a matter of WP:DUE and/or WP:BALANCE, where its placement on the article relative to the top is based on its significance or weight related to the song (i.e., things that is not that "important" is placed lower in the article).
The music video section generally doesn't come after the composition section.
Does it mean need to merge to the music video section to Promotion and release?
They want any information about the song's performance on iTunes and Spotify charts to be removed since they are generally unsuitable for inclusion per WP:SINGLEVENDOR, especially in the song's case since it already charted in Billboard Philippines, which has more weight than the iTunes and Spotify charts.
Does it mean need to merge to the music video section to Promotion and release?
No, just move the music video below the Promotion and release.
This is noted. But, what should we add/change? The music video and accolades?
Just remove the details about Spotify performances for now. There's nothing new to be added yet since the song has not commercially performed new recently (besides Spotify and iTunes).
No, just move the music video below the Promotion and release.
Done
Just remove the details about Spotify performances for now. There's nothing new to be added yet since the song has not commercially performed new recently (besides Spotify and iTunes).