Talk:Common good

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2402:3A80:DDD:4F33:0:B:6532:7601 in topic Good

Removed

edit

"The organization Common Good [1]is a bipartisan, nonprofit coalition that is working to restore common sense to American law."

Removed this.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.166.89.77 (talkcontribs) 12:04,19 October 2005 (UTC)

No.....this is a separate issue that needs to be defined independently. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.7.71.246 (talkcontribs) 04:44, 20 October 2005 (UTC) Reply
Seems to have a page of its own, now. Moonraker12 (talk) 14:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Common Good - Party?

edit

This page links from the UK parliamentary constituency Birmingham Northfield. A party called "Common Good" stood there at the 2005 election. Is there a chance the redirect has somehow got rid of the party's article? doktorb 20:30, 12 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

definition

edit

Common good does not seem to be defined in economic literature in a way as it is described in this article. This article is in need for reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mronkko (talkcontribs) 14:49, 25 January 2006(UTC)

Redirecting to avoid confusion

edit

There is another page which, confusingly, has the same name as the very important political governance concept known as "the common good." I have already twice gone to that page when trying to get to this one (which is simply under the name "Common Good"). I doubt if even 10% of the people on Wikipedia typing "the common good" into the search field intend to find a page on a tiny British political party. May I suggest renaming that page to "The Common Good Party" and redirecting all searches for "the common good" to this page? It would certainly allow more people to reach their correct destination and avoid confusion and wasted time. --Rameses 15:44, 26 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Agree; done (finally!) Moonraker12 (talk) 14:27, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism

edit

I just wanted to say that I wrote a subheading for the common good a few months ago that contributed to it's definition. When I came back a few months later, I saw that a vandal had removed it. I've since put it back but I wanted to make sure that it doesn't happen again. Is there anyway I can flag the previous edits as vandalism?

Jamessalt 15:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC)JamesReply

Why would you want to flag them? Best way to deal with vandalism is to add pages you care about to your watchlist and check them as often as possible (there are RSS and other tools to help). The less popular the page, the smaller chance of vandalism but also the bigger chance 'nobody cares' and it will go unnoticed for a long time.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  17:10, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Minor edit needed

edit

This text "allows the pursuit of virtue, but is prescribe what the common good actually is." near the end of the article isn't grammatical and doesn't make sense. Probably a typo/edito of some sort. I would fix it but am not sure of the original intent. Maybe it's supposed to be "allows the pursuit of virtue, but does not prescribe what the common good actually is."? Ronewolf 00:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC) catReply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Common good. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:57, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Bibliography of potential new sources

edit

Rousseau, 'The Social Contract' and Other Later Political Writings, trans. Victor Gourevitch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. Rousseau, Discourse on the Origin and Basis of Inequality Among Men Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: Bartlett, Robert C. and Susan D. Collins. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2012. Dyson, R. W. (ed.), 2002, Thomas Aquinas Political Writings, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Mill's Principles of Political Economy (1848) Mill, J. S., 1861, Considerations on Representative Government, Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1991. Elster, J., 2002, “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory,” in Philosophy and Democracy, ed. T. Christiano, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rawls, J., 1971, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Locke, John, Works, 10 vols. London, 1823; reprinted, Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1963. Epstein, R.A., 1998, Principles for a Free Society: Reconciling Individual Liberty with the Common Good, New York: Basic Books. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcmilfred (talkcontribs) 01:33, 17 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Common good. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Common good. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:50, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Common good. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

"end" = "goal" or "terminus"?

edit

As of 2020-07-04 this article includes, 'Saint Thomas Aquinas held "the common good" (bonum commune, in Latin) to be the end of law and government;[5] John Locke declared that "the peace, safety, and public good of the people" are the ends of political society.'

The word "ends" in this context seems confusing: Is this saying that the law, government and political society should be designed to maximize the common good? Or that the common good will be extinguished by law, government, and political society?

The latter may be correct, but I suspect that Aquinas and Locke intended the former. Accordingly, I am changing "end" to "goal" in these phrases. DavidMCEddy (talk) 23:07, 4 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Common Goods for Health

edit

Hello,

This is my first time that I'm contributing my knowledge about Common Goods for Health in wikipedia. Please review my addition and let me know your feedback.

Thanks in advance.

Good

edit

What is common good 2402:3A80:DDD:4F33:0:B:6532:7601 (talk) 11:40, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
design 1
Done 1
eth 8
see 8