Talk:Common sense

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Common sense article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 3 months

Common sense is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 2, 2004	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

Philosophy: Epistemology / Logic / Ethics High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology
	Logic
	Ethics

This article was selected as the article for improvement on 22 July 2013 for a period of one week.

Legal understanding of common sense / Common Sense Inference

Latest comment: 20 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Wondering if it's worth adding a section discussing the legal understanding of "common sense" since it does appear often in contract law, and the Common Sense Inference could be considered an underpinning of trial judgements. Chronoste (talk) 16:44, 11 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Depends how naturally it links to other meanings? (Presuming there is a reasonable amount published about it, maybe it deserves its own article?)--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 21:52, 11 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic