Talk:Copulation (zoology)

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Copulation (zoology) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Animals High‑importance

Copulation (zoology) is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Sexology and sexuality High‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 6 April 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Sexual intercourse. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 6 April 2024

Latest comment: 8 months ago8 comments7 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 10:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

– This is common article about sexual intercourse which should be renamed as sexual intercourse (in common) or sexual intercourse in animals instead of the article sexual intercourse which is about human only, thus should be renamed as sexual intercourse in humans. 202.134.11.235 (talk) 10:25, 6 April 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. SilverLocust 💬 09:17, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Note: a move request at Talk:Sexual intercourse conflicted with this request and has been combined into it. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 20:00, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. Instead, move copulation (zoology) to copulation. Sexual intercourse isn't a term that is normally used in non-human contexts. Copulation is normally used in non-human contexts, and most of the incoming links to copulation intend a non-human context. Note that copulation has substantial edit history; there should be a history-merge rather than a straight move if there is consensus to move. Plantdrew (talk) 16:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Also, if Copulation (zoology) is moved to Copulation, then the hatnote at Sexual intercourse will have to be altered, as well. And a round robin page move procedure should be used with move _targets that have significant edit history. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 15:39, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Note: WikiProject Sexology and sexuality and WikiProject Animals have been notified of this discussion. SilverLocust 💬 03:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oppose for reasons given by Plantdrew. I'm neutral/undecided about what if anything should be done with the copulation basename. Perhaps better to have a separate discussion about that. Colin M (talk) 22:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose per above. Ahri.boy (talk) 00:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic