Talk:Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
editCAROLYN MAHANEY I have added a short sentence stating that CJ and Carolyn Mahaney have been noted as speakers and supporters of this council. I believe that this addition will gain traffic to this page and will increase its credibility and notice with CJ and Carolyn's reader. I have recently created a page detailing Carolyn and her ministry. Since she is involved with this ministry, I would greatly appreciate any reviews or critiques of her page ("Carolyn Mahaney"). This is my first time contributing to Wikipedia and I would love any feedback you could provide! Thanks!!
sources for the 'history' of the CBMW
editI would point out that neither the Daily Mail nor the Baptist News pieces contain much information on the history of the CBMW, and that the recent addition, which was mainly sourced to them, appeared to go well beyond what little they actually said about the topic. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 03:16, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101205045131/http://www.cbmw.org:80/Journal/Vol-14-No-1/Personal-Reflections-on-the-History-of-CBMW-and-the-State-of-the-Gender-Debate to http://www.cbmw.org/Journal/Vol-14-No-1/Personal-Reflections-on-the-History-of-CBMW-and-the-State-of-the-Gender-Debate
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090510130026/http://churchofthefirstcentury.org:80/SOF.aspx to http://churchofthefirstcentury.org/SOF.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120402112501/http://bpnews.org/BPnews.asp?ID=35663 to http://bpnews.org/BPnews.asp?ID=35663
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:24, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101103040658/http://www.cbmw.org/Danvers to http://www.cbmw.org/Danvers
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:30, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
We need more independent sources discussing the Danvers Statement, here are some
editThese.[1][2][3][4] Just checked, we're using one of these but I'll leave it here still. Doug Weller talk 09:53, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- The second reference is from an author who has co-authored multiple books with H. Wayne House, who is on the Council, so you can't really call it independent. There is nothing in the third link that isn't already stated elsewhere on this page, both in and out of the section on the Danvers Statement.
- Though the 1st and 4th links have some interesting text that I found enlightening and quotable for the section. CleverTitania (talk) 19:18, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking at this and commenting. I agree about the 2nd reference not being usable. Doug Weller talk 11:16, 5 July 2018 (UTC)