Talk:Diderot effect

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Peace and Passion in topic Any empirical research? Is it even valid?


very poorly referenced — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.29.75.229 (talk) 14:47, 25 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diderot effect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:55, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Any empirical research? Is it even valid?

edit

There needs to be some empirical work on this "effect" incorporated into the article? Or is it rather one of those "effects" that "sounds like a plausible thing," and so now we've decided it is (even though behaviour, when studied, often turns out to be other than what we assume sounds right...)? Peace and Passion   ("I'm listening....") 09:17, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
HOME 1
Intern 2
languages 2
Note 1
os 2
web 2