This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latvia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latvia related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatviaWikipedia:WikiProject LatviaTemplate:WikiProject LatviaLatvia
Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Is there for too colorful laguage in the later half of the section, which paints very bad picture of the subject ~~Xil (talk) 22:43, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yes. Even early in the article: "shabby court" indeed. The EB1911 POV hasn't been properly filtered out. I will see what I can do. I also have a second source which should help moving the article toward objectivity. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 11:03, 30 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Having added the second source (1905 NIE), I think it too paints about as bad a picture, but it is more specific on details and doesn't just rely on colorful adjectives. And it does concede he was a good administrator. So I hope with this, and my previous edit to further resolve the 1911 Britannica POV problem, the article can be called somewhat more objective. I have removed the POV banner. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 12:53, 30 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
