Talk:Evan Mecham

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Former featured article candidateEvan Mecham is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 20, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
November 5, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 18, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
October 24, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 4, 2013, and April 4, 2018.
Current status: Former featured article candidate

Lost right to host Super Bowl

edit

Does anyone have a better reference to Arizona losing a Super Bowl than the Jeffery Scott webpage? I have been looking through old newspaper archives in an attempt to find more information and am starting to think that any Super Bowl that was lost had to have occurred when Mecham was not in office.

The most obvious candidate for lost hosting rights was Super Bowl XXV which was awarded to Tampa Bay on 20 May 1987 ("Tampa Awarded 25th Super Bowl". New York Times. 21 May 1987. p. D27. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)). The problem with this possibility is Super Bowl XXV had no Arizona city was among the list of candidates that submitted a bid for hosting the game (The original list of candidates were San Diego, Los Angeles, Pasadena, San Francisco, Anaheim, Dallas, Miami, New Orleans, Tampa, Jacksonville, and Houston with Seattle also considering a bid — "Simms Receives Rewards as M.V.P.". New York Times. 10 February 1987. p. D31. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)). Super Bowls XXI, XXII, XXIII, and XXIV were all awarded to cities outside of Arizona before Mecham was elected to office and are thus not candidates for the lost Super Bowl either. ("Saints Reportedly Up for Sale". New York Times. 25 May 1984. p. B12. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)"N.F.L. Sets Sites Of 2 Super Bowls". New York Times. 15 March 1985. p. A18. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)).

So this leads to the question, If none of the Super Bowls that were awarded before Mecham took office and played after he was inaugurated were move from Arizona, and there were no Arizona cities seeking the Super Bowl hosting rights that were being discussed while Mecham was in office, how could he have been personally responsible for the state not receiving a Super Bowl? If no one can find a better reference stating which Super Bowl was lost and giving attribution for the loss to Mecham, I am going to chalk this up as an urban legend and remove the claim from the article. --Allen3 01:43, 14 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Expanding my search a little more turned up the following articles:
  • Thomas George (14 March 1990). "Phoenix Gets '93 Super Bowl if King Holiday Goes Statewide; '93 Super Bowl to Phoenix If King Holiday Wins Vote". New York Times. p. D27. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  • Thomas George (22 March 1991). "Cardinals' Owner Unhappy With Vote". New York Times. p. D27. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
These two articles indicate that Super Bowl XXVII was conditionally awarded to Phoenix in 1990 and moved to Pasadena because the ballot initiative to create a paid MLK holiday was not passed by the voters. As these activities took place well after Mecham was out of office, it would appear to clear him of having lost the state a Super Bowl. --Allen3 talk 02:27, 14 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

As there have been no comments one way or the other about Mecham's involvement in loosing a Super Bowl, I have removed the information about the loss from the article. I have also removing the estimate of $500 million economic as it includes the loss of the 1993 Super Bowl making the estimate as much about the state's MLK Day as it does with Mecham. --Allen3 talk 13:01, 16 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

The loss of the Superbowl should probably be mentioned, but I agree with you that the wording that was there was probably not terribly good. The Super Bowl XXVII page has the event accurately depicted: since AZ (in 1990) was the only state without MLK day, due to pressure the NLF moved Superbowl XXVII. Mecham gets blamed since he canceled the MLK holiday that had been created by Executive Order.
As a resident of AZ at the time Mecham was in Office, I remember that losing the Superbowl was a distinct concern when he canceled it, but I'd like to find a better reference than my own memory before putting that in. I'll have to check through my stacks of old New Times and Tribunes to see if I can find something. -- Kaszeta 14:10, 16 January 2006 (UTC)Reply
Having grown up in Tucson, and even having signed one of the recall petitions, I have similiar memories to yours. I do not have a problem with a mention of the Super Bowl XXVII move from Phoenix as long as there are some good sources (try the two Thomas George for a starting point). Let's just try not to smear Mecham with any negatives that he does not deserve when there are so many that he does deserve;-). --Allen3 talk 15:20, 16 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Martin Luther King Holiday

edit

Although I was not living in Arizona at the time, I am currently an Arizona resident, and I recall the controversy over Governor Mecham. I am glad that the article points out the Martin Luther King holiday was improperly ordered by the preceding Governor, and that Evan Mecham was doing no more than fulfilling the law when he "canceled" it. Of course, the way he went about it, and his goofy comments on that and other issues, caused all his problems and eventually led to his impeachment, conviction, and removal from office. If "terminal stupidity" is an impeachable offense, then the Legislature had plenty of cause. John Paul Parks (talk) 21:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Evan Mecham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Evan Mecham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:47, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Evan Mecham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Evan Mecham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:54, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Impeachment, recall and criminal indictment

edit

I know that Evan Mecham was the only governor in Arizona State history to be removed from office by impeachment[1], but I also remember the news at the time saying that he was the only US governor to every be under threat of recall, impeachment, and indictment; all at the same time. Does anyone know of reference sources for this? Thanks C. W. Gilmore (talk) 11:30, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Evan Mecham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:59, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
INTERN 11
Note 1
Project 14