| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eye strain article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Eye strain.
|
 |
This article links to one or more _target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Merge of Computer vision syndrome
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- No merge. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 16:52, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
I've proposed merger of Computer vision syndrome which has been tagged for over a year as lacking any sources to verify. Things not quite as bad as Talk:Computer vision syndrome suggests as there are 17 sources to be found at PubMed (ie not just "in books"). However it is clear on performing PubMed search for "Eye strain" (96 hits) that same computer-use senario is being largely described (or at least aspects of computer office usage).
This short article already has brief mention of computer screens as a cause and so a slight expansion is all that is required in merging the topics (PS WP:MEDMOS requires naming the condition per technical name for the condition and using redirects for significant lay terms). David Ruben Talk 01:17, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Asthenopia is not the same as CVS!!!! merging these two pages is a bad idea! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.64.17.45 (talk) 17:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
agreed!!!! they aren't the same!!!! these articles shouldn't be merged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.74.111.178 (talk) 08:00, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Edits on 13 Oct 2017
edit- @Doc James: I have kept your reversion of 41.136.119.1's mess ( e[[eye|ye]] ), but I have gone back to my change about blurred images, to explain the reason for the ciliary muscle tightening in this case; or please discuss. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:29, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Not sure "vain" needed. Have adjusted a bit. Let me know what you think. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)