Talk:Fingering (sexual act)

Latest comment: 8 months ago by Autisticeditor 20 in topic Possible split

Prostate massage

edit

I added a new section regarding the prostate massage through fingering the prostate gland in men here and it has been reverted by User:Crossroads citing it as tangential topic and it was also pointed out that Psychology Today is a poor source for reference. Since, I don't know much about the weight-age of different websites and perhaps someone could help me understand how we decide a source as good or bad and whether we have any objective measure or just subjective opinion. Further, even if the source is poor still there is no denying that this is a known topic which also has wiki article. IMO, the revert was done in uncaring and thoughtless manner. Isn't it better to think about the merits and demerits of the edits rather than to just simple revert it in a haste manner to display authoritativeness to new users? Humansexuality (talk) 04:51, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

I did think about it, and it remains that this is WP:UNDUE. Prostate stimulation is already covered and does not need its own subheading. Crossroads -talk- 22:20, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
I sincerely hope that you are intelligent enough to not think that people will fall for your obscure justifications and your evasion like you didn't address any of the points raised. As I checked your contributions, I found that many of your edits are just reverts to intimidate new users as an act of bullying or to just increase your edit numbers or both. I am requesting you to not engage in this act of Vandalism or I have to involve admins and let them decide the quality of your edit and all of your contributions and whether your act of vandalism is against Wikipedia policies, which I am sure would be although I don't know about that as of now. I don't want your account to be blocked by admins so I leave it to you to improve the reverts that you have made. Humansexuality (talk) 07:13, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
You are right 41.116.242.221 (talk) 15:52, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
It is wrong to have sex with her or him 41.116.242.221 (talk) 15:53, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
why is it wrong
@Humansexuality 41.114.180.153 (talk) 22:26, 13 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Safety and Sexual Assault

edit

Re. "For example, penetration without consent of the vagina or anus with a finger is called 'rape' in Australia[18] and 'forcible rape' in the US.": how does a vagina or asshole consent? And how does either do so "with a finger"? Really, the writing on Wikipedia is so crappy most of the time. 107.147.183.77 (talk) 18:28, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Teaser(gesture)" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Teaser(gesture) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 24#Teaser(gesture) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 05:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

You have any other questions or that message 41.116.242.221 (talk) 15:55, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Steel1943 2003:FF:7F03:EFBF:65F0:9F06:8BCA:D514 (talk) 11:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Image

edit

Possible minors in image Faisv (talk) 21:24, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

The only image is a basic drawing, with adults. Not sure of your concern.--Dmol (talk) 22:47, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Possible split

edit

This article should be split into two articles. One for vulvar/vaginal fingering with its current title and the other for anal fingering with the new title "anal fingering". While fingering is a similar activity whether genitalia or anus, they are different nonetheless, in regards to technique and health risks. Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 19:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
admin 3
Note 1
Project 6
USERS 2