Talk:Firefighting foam

Latest comment: 11 months ago by 86.8.126.91 in topic Foam from Pig's blood ?

History of Fire Fighting Foams

edit

The subj article was recently created, but seems the historical material would be better cleaned up and merged into here. Dl2000 14:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

"Fire retardant foam" often refers to solid foams often used in the production of furniture which resist ignition, as required under British law in recent years.

I would suggest the term "Fire fighting foam" would better describe this subject matter, referring to foam used to suppress fires, or perhaps a disambiguation page stating the two possible meanings of "Fire retardant foam". Noodle999 21:20, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

edit

Moved from the article, a few external links that appear to be advertisements:

MrBell (talk) 20:23, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Foam from Pig's blood ?

edit

When I was in the British Royal Navy around 1972, I recall being told that the drums for fighting oil fires contained pig's blood to produce the foam. Please can anyone confirm or deny this, and if true, add the info into the history section of the article ? Darkman101 (talk) 07:16, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I know it was still used at HMS Raleigh in 2008 for the firefighting courses. 86.132.72.67 (talk) 19:11, 29 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

When I was in the US Navy ca 1974 I was told it contained goat's blood. If shipwrecked and stranded on a life raft and one such 5 gallon container floated by we were advised to grab it as one could drink it. But then again, I was also told that when passing through the Straights of Gibraltar that African monkeys would swim out to the ship and try to climb up on the fantail. The stuff sure smelled like something organic though - it really stunk.Im.your.wicked.uncle.ernie (talk) 23:07, 17 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Served during the 1980s - told same - high protein - grab it - might save you. DO not remember any specifics of what it contained - but the blood portion prior sounds familiar. heard before by around 1990 started to be foam was no longer a protein base.

I have also heard a recent story of a US navy ship recently (Since say 2013) a US ship suffered an issue where ALL foam was utilized dealing with issue. SHIP PROMPTLY pulled into port - uncertain if reason was purely over assistance post factor of the issue required shore based assistance; or concern having no foam if anything else occurred. - Pardon my vagueness; believe it makes me safe, included details and I'd get into trouble. Wfoj3 (talk) 00:23, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Royal Navy aircraft carriers were using firefighting foam in 1945, see here:[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.8.126.91 (talk) 16:46, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Firefighting foam. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Firefighting foam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Firefighting foam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
Bugs 1
innovation 2
INTERN 6
Note 1
Project 27