Talk:Frank G. Jackson

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Reywas92 in topic "Political party"?

Campaign literature?

edit

This page reads like a campaign flyer, not an objective encyclopedia entry. It deserves immediate clean-up. -- 65.34.87.70 19:07, 29 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

I pulled the campaign literature out of it and left the stub intact. Perhaps an impartial person with more information on Mr. Jackson could expand on it. -- Clevelandguy 05:45, 14 September 2005 (UTC)Reply
Does anyone really know enough about Frank Jackson to write an article that DOESN'T sound like campaign literature? Frankly, I'm impressed that the article held more than the typical "Frank Jackson is a True Cleavelander" fare that we've been getting. -- 24.50.195.234 01:15, 20 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

African American Italian?

edit

Is that actually a distinction? It seems like a silly thing to say. john k (talk) 21:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

This is a trainwreck

edit

Unreferenced, claism and counterclaims, this is a real mess. I'll nominate it for deletion next week if it is not fixed. Bearian (talk) 05:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I don't see this in the current version? Where are claims and counterclaims? Hipocrite (talk) 16:17, 3 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frank G. Jackson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:28, 4 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frank G. Jackson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

"Political party"?

edit

Why is there a "political party" in the subject's description, when his office (Mayor) is a nonpartisan election AND his state does not register voters by party? 192.34.130.55 (talk) 15:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Because sources that identify that Jackson is a Democrat include [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Just because the mayoral election itself doesn't use party labels does not mean Jackson or other individuals are not affiliated with parties. Reywas92Talk 19:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
  NODES
HOME 1
Intern 4
languages 2
Note 1
os 2
web 4