Talk:Gageo Reef

Edit war

Some of you currently appear to be engaged in an edit war regarding the name of the reef that some call Gageo Reef‎ and others call Rixiang Reef. Please use the articles' talk pages to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 21:50, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Notability

I'm not sure how this is notable. The only reason I found it was by tracking Bason0's sockpuppetry. As the article is written, I don't see how its notable for inclusion at all. The article shows no historic or political importance and cites no sources. Are we to include every single submerged rock in the world? That list would number in the hundreds of thousands! Basically, there's no reason to include this unless there's something important about it that's not listed here. If there is, please include it and reference it. I've put this on my watch page. If not expanded by December, I'll nominate it for deletion. --Jdcaust (talk) 23:13, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

December 2007

I just took out some pro-Korean POV pushing. If this article were not up for AfD, I'd suggest reverting out the November 2007 changes, which originally came from the sockpuppet of a banned user. • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

This reef incorporated south korea already. When korea incorporated this reef, PRC goverment did not official protest to this. also this reef first found by Japanese ship, when Korea under Japanese rule. China didn't claim this reef was their. (also China never occupied this reef) and S.Korea incorporated behavior obeyed international law and the international law of the sea. Korea and China have not territorial dispute this reef. Chinese goverment never protest to this. some ultra nationalistic chinese want make territorial dispute. and want change reef name to their own will. cleary, Rixiang Reef name is Pro-China POV pushing. if you think "Are we to include every single submerged rock in the world? That list would number in the hundreds of thousands!" ok. then, Rixiang Reef also need delete, too. by the international law, official name of This reef is Gageo reef. Midum (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 09:14, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gageo Reef. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713154703/http://kjdaily.com/read.php3?aid=117068760074733r8 to http://kjdaily.com/read.php3?aid=117068760074733r8

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)