Talk:Golan Heights Law

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Selfstudier in topic missing archive?

1RR

edit

@VwM.Mwv: you have just crossed 1RR. Please self revert. Then please explain here your objection to the quoted source. Onceinawhile (talk) 05:03, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Icewhiz: I understand you are mentoring this editor. Onceinawhile (talk) 05:05, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Replied in user space. As for the content dispute here (which I know a thing or two about) - I will weigh in with a source as it seems A Companion to Border Studies might be good for border studies, but poor in internal Israeli politics (outside sources often have these issues). See - Haaretz 2009 reprint of 1981 - 63 in favor (including 8 from Labor, the main opposition party), and 21 against (including 13 from Labor). Many Labor members also didn't show up to vote (Labor actually decided not to vote - the 21 Labor voters acted against the party decision). This caused an internal crisis in Labor - annexation very much fit with Labor policy in the 70s and early 80s - they built the settlements and were in charge in 1967 and 1973-4 - Labor's shift to peace for land (including the Golan) was later - mid to late 80s. Labor held 47 seats in the 57 seat strong opposition at the time . Weigh my comments, this source (and others) as you may, I'm staying out of this beyond this. Icewhiz (talk) 05:21, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
    Also - I added an ARBPIA banner to the page and a 1RR edit notice to the article, and this is reasonably construed ARBPIA.Icewhiz (talk) 05:39, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

missing archive?

edit

It would seem unlikely to me that the only comments here were made in 2019. I don't see an archive link? -HammerFilmFan HammerFilmFan (talk) 16:20, 14 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Look at the history, nothing major there except for the above. Selfstudier (talk) 16:54, 14 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
  NODES
admin 3
INTERN 2
Note 1
Project 19