Talk:HMAS Sydney (1912)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMAS Sydney (1912) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Complaint against the CO
editI have jsut read A B Facey's " a fortunate life" in which he states his brother was transferred off the SYDNEY for making a complaint against the CO reference the action against the Emden. Anyone know any more? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ir5ac (talk • contribs) 08:49, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Ensign?
editIs the Australian Ensign appropriate for the period? 122.49.166.189 (talk) 10:09, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on HMAS Sydney (1912). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130506083453/http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/breaking-news/sydney-naval-monument-gets-facelift/story-fnhrvfuw-1226633204367 to http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/breaking-news/sydney-naval-monument-gets-facelift/story-fnhrvfuw-1226633204367
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.newsboost.com/newsroom/sydney-emden-100th-anniversary/fact-sheet-links-to-new-south-wales
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:32, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 9 November 2024
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"Flagship" in two places should not be capitalized (as supported by one of the newspaper sources). Clarityfiend (talk) 13:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Sohom (talk) 15:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)