Jayden Daniels has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 12, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This article was nominated for deletion on 1 January 2020. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This page was proposed for deletion by John from Idegon (talk · contribs) on 27 December 2019. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Jayden Daniels/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Dissident93 (talk · contribs) 15:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 19:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I will complete an initial review of this article within one week. -Riley1012 (talk) 19:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
1. Well-written
- ...with 6 touchdowns en route to an appearance in the 2021 Las Vegas Bowl... to maintain consistency with the rest of the article and per MOS:NUMERAL, the 6 here should be written out (six).
2. Verifiable
Earwig is highlighting names of awards, no issues with this. No notes on the reference layout or reliable sources.
Spot check: 4, 6, 17, 19, 25, 28, 34, 36, 44, 48, 51, 56, 61, 69, 77, 85- no issues.
- Ref. 3 notes he was 137 pounds his freshman year instead of 125?
- Ref 6 and 15 are the same article.
- 55: ...he became the first player to complete at least 85 percent in consecutive games. Add a note with the clarification from the source that this requires attempting at least 20 passes in each game.
3. Broad
- Is it necessary to have the notes with the game scores? Especially in sentences where it is already explained that the team won/lost?
- I have a few notes on irrelevant details that I feel should be removed:
- In April 2024, Regina was found to have violated NCAA guidelines by booking flights for recruits to visit Arizona State during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. This article is about Jayden, not his mother.
- His favorite meal to prepare is spaghetti and other types of pasta, with his favorite snack being honey buns. Doesn't add anything important/notable
4. Neutral
No concerns with neutrality
5. Stable
No concerns with stability
6. Illustrated
The images are free use, relevant, and have suitable captions.
@Dissident93: Okay, that is all I have. Good job with this article- my suggestions are in bullet points. -Riley1012 (talk) 20:20, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- I kept the Washington Post source regarding his weight (125lb) since the author of the article interviewed his family in San Bernardino for it, which should be more accurate than the other citation. "Is it necessary to have the notes with the game scores?" I only included scores in prose that were uncommon/notable (63-7). I can either add all scores to prose or remove the ones delegated to notes due not being super important. All other suggestions I agreed with and fixed or removed. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 22:01, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Dissident93: Thanks for the quick response. Yeah, I would prefer the non-notable scores to be removed entirely- it does not seem to be common practice on other GA football biographies that I've seen. -Riley1012 (talk) 00:39, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. I removed them. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 22:03, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Dissident93: Thanks for the quick response. Yeah, I would prefer the non-notable scores to be removed entirely- it does not seem to be common practice on other GA football biographies that I've seen. -Riley1012 (talk) 00:39, 11 October 2024 (UTC)