Talk:Jill Kelly (actress)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Divorce

edit

http://www.lukeisback.com/stars/stars/corey_jordan.htm

This refers to Jill Kelly getting divorced from Corey Jordan. Should it be included in the page?

15:39, 28 August 2006‎ User:Krome007

Two persons have the same name!

edit

The page should stay! Two persons have the same name, but that is not a reason for deletion!!!--AsiBakshish (talk) 16:08, 14 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

AFIK there is only one person with the name "Jill Kelly" that for which an article exists. That is the porn actress. No one is suggesting it be deleted. I don't think I'm going out on a limb in saying that if a new article were created about the "other" Jill Kelly, the porn starlet would still be the primary topic.  little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer
 
17:17, 14 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 24 March 2015

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Number 57 17:36, 2 April 2015 (UTC)Reply


Jill Kelly (pornographic actress)Jill Kelly – per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, Disam page at current location does not meet Disam requirements, subject is sole subject with article name. Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 02:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Oppose the dab reads:

Evidently there is no absolute majority topic in Google Books In ictu oculi (talk) 07:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

(actress)/(pornographic actress) RfC

edit

An RfC which may affect this article's title is currently taking place (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography#RfC: Should a person who has appeared in exclusively pornographic films be described as "(actor/-tress)" or "(pornographic actor/-tress)"?). Rebecca1990 (talk) 07:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Jill Kelly (actress). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Jill Kelly (actress). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Jill Kelly (actress). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Cal Jammer

edit

I recently added a section about the circumstances concerning her husband Cal Jammer and his suicide, although another editor removed this section because he opines (through WP:OR) that it is "psychoanalysis" [1]. The events were widely reported and had profound impact on Jill Kelly's life. The incidents also served as inspiration on the characters of the 1997 film Boogie Nights, meaning they had impact on popular culture as well. I mean that the section is well-sourced and relevant. It also cites the assessment of a close eyewitness and friend of Jammer, and is as such not "psychoanalysis" but a legitimate account. Citing BLP for a person who has been dead for more than 20 years is also dubious at best, but even so, there is nothing in that section that violates BLP even if it is applicable. Holanthony (talk) 15:42, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Kelly is a living person, and shoehorning an single-sourced amateur psychological evaluation of her non-notable dead husband into her biography has nothing to do with writing an encyclopedia -- especially since author of the cited source has no professional expertise in the area, but is an English professor. There is no place for amateur psychological speculation in a Wikipedia biography, whether the subject is living or dead, and whether the speculator is an English professor, a porn director, or a tap-dancing monkey. The relevant factual content has not been removed from the bio, despite your implications otherwise. Also, as you've been told over and over, WP:OR does no apply to the evaluation of sources, and it would apply just as much to your claim that the source is reliable and appropriate. Your failure to understand and comply with basic sourcing policies does not justify your repeated insertion of unacceptable material into Wikipedia biographies. It is becoming apparent that you have learned nothing from this ANI discussion, where your complaints about similar editing disputes were soundly rejected and you were explicitly warned "that further edits posing BLP problems are likely to lead to sanctions". The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 16:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
That bears no merit, the source quotes a direct eyewitness who was a personal friend of the people involved. In what field one of the author's expertise lies during his office hours is of little to no consequence, particularly in regards to conducing well-researched work. Besides, no one is calling it "psychoanalysis" but you. Otherwise, point out the exact place in the source where the term "psychoanalysis" is used in a relevant context. Of course, you cannot find one because it is your own concoction and distortion of facts not in evidence. Furthermore, the text utilizes multiple secondary, reliable sources, confirming the same thing. This is seemingly yet another case of WP:JDL as displayed by your consistent blatant pornphobic behavior in a vast many biographies of people active in the pornographic industry. Holanthony (talk) 17:04, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
When did the suicide event happen? --Gryllida 19:17, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
January 1995. It's reported in the article. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 19:44, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. :-) --Gryllida 22:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • When undoing a non-vandalism edit (something that does not immediately strike as an attempt to break things), I might suggest that the contributor undoing the edit leaves a message on article talk instead of using edit summaries to talk. Doing so increases the chances of respectful conflict resolution and editor engagement in other productive edits. --Gryllida 22:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Holanthony, this information about Cal Jammer doesn't really belong to this article. --Gryllida 22:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Holanthony, noting that, I would also like to expose how biased your writing is; that may help you in your additions to other articles.
However, according to several adult film directors, Jammer was, in spite of a long list of credits[which?], not very successful[clarification needed] in the industry, and according to ... (whom? when?) was obsessed(We Wikipedia people do not know this - who does? Attribute the fact. with thoughts of his wife’s infidelity.[6] Jill Kelly, along with several of her colleagues(whom? how did they even know Jill's husband?), attested that Jammer would be exceedingly jealous of Kelly and was obsessed with her('be obsessed' is vague; please clarify precisely what that entailed). In spite of this, he would constantly cheat on her(how? with whom? how often? when? where? without this clarify, this just becomes defamation). He repeatedly swore he would quit(where? when?), but always failed to do so. Prior to his suicide, he had made frequent threats to kill himself over a long period of time(how long?) before finally acting on his threat.[6][11] Henri Pachard(context? who on Earth is that? claimed that Jammer was in fact suffering from a sexual identity crisis.[6][12] Line break recommended; this is a new thought The Boogie Nights character "Little" Bill Thompson (played by William H. Macy) was modeled after Cal Jammer, with fellow pornographic actress Nina Hartley playing a character modeled after Jill Kelly.[6]
--Gryllida 22:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jill Kelly (actress). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:07, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
admin 2
inspiration 1
INTERN 9
Note 1
Project 22