 | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 December 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lea Gabrielle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
request edit
editI am Lea Gabrielle's agent and she is no longer married to Greg Sutton. I have edited this off of Lea's page several times, but someone keeps putting it back on. Lea is divorced from Mr. Sutton and wants his name removed from her page. You can contact me at: (Redacted) for privacy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.115.238.17 (talk) 19:30, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- With your obvious conflict of interest, you should not have edited that page. Obviously, since she was married to Sutton, his name would not be removed from the article. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:44, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
What conflict of interest?!?! I just want the information on my client's page to be correct! My client was married to Sutton, but the page lists him as her current spouse, that is not correct! It should be removed! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.115.238.17 (talk) 14:47, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- We just want the information on every Wikipedia article to be correct. The link to the conflict of interest page in Orange Mike's message explains why you have a conflict of interest, please click it and read it. Also, please read the advice you were given on the HelpDesk when you posted there. And one polite bit of advice, please don't refer to the article as "my client's page", "her page" or use any expression that implies ownership, it's a terminology that really riles all Wikipedia editors. No one owns any page on wikipedia, least of all it's subject. - X201 (talk) 15:03, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Then let's make the information on this article correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.115.238.17 (talk) 22:03, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
This article appears to violate Wiki policies by including material related to Capt. Dennis M. Gillespie, including NPOV and ideological bias. The same applies to the undiscussed footnote reference to the Tailhook episode.
The Gillespie and Tailhook controversies occurred long before Gabrielle became a Naval Aviator, and no evidence is cited to indicate that she was subjected to discrimination. To the contrary, her assignment history seems to reflect the opposite. Injecting material irrelevant to Gabrielle favors one side of the general issue of women in combat, and a biographical article of one person is hardly an appropriate forum to do that subject justice.
Showtime96 (talk) 20:11, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Consider it
Done. With living people, it is the Wikipedia policy to be extremely careful and considerate. We do not like lawsuits and bad feeling/press. With that in mind, the name "Greg Sutton" does not appear in the article now. Instead it refers to her previous married name. Thanks, AstroU (talk) 19:31, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
- Consider it
Where's the picture?
editA photo-picture (or an action picture with an F-18) would seem to me to improve this article. -- AstroU (talk) 19:33, 22 March 2016 (UTC)