Talk:Library

Wikipedia Ambassador Program assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Toronto supported by WikiProject Wikipedia and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 14:30, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Incorrect lede definition

The lede section of the article states "A library is a curated collection of sources of information and similar resources, selected by experts and made accessible to a defined community for reference or borrowing, often in a quiet environment conducive to study" However, Webster's Dictionary defines a library as "a place in which literary, musical, artistic, or reference materials (such as books, manuscripts, recordings, or films) are kept for use but not for sale; a collection of such materials." It would appear that the dictionary definition is more authoritative than the relatively weak citations given, especially considering the fact that the article contains no disambiguation qualifiers such as "Library (accademic)" etc. Psychstudent007 (talk) 22:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

I don't see what the problem is. There is a disambiguation link in the hatnote. Dictionary definitions may differ, and you haven't provided a good reason why we should consider the definition that you quoted to be especially authoritative. The definition that you quoted seems to me to be close in meaning to the current first sentence in the article, and you haven't explained why you prefer it. Biogeographist (talk) 22:39, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Merged sections "Digital libraries" and "Digital libraries"

Hi! I merged the two duplicate sections and removed information that is better suited to the digital library article itself. Aiue (talk) 14:46, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

"Libry" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Libry has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 6 § Libry until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:17, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

The oldest libraries

The world’s oldest known library is the ancient library of Ebla which dates back to 2500 – 2250 BCE. It predates the library of Ashurbanipal. It is rather strange why that’s not mentioned in the history section.

Sources:

https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/25541212.pdf?acceptTC=true

“The discovery of the ancient library of Ebla is much more recent than. Assurbanipal's, though the library itself is much more ancient”

https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/edcoll/9789004305069/B9789004305069_006.xml

Whatsupkarren (talk) 09:44, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Hey, I don't really understand what you're saying - could you put your request in a "Change x to y" format? Or has the article already been edited to your satisfaction?

JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | 23:38, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

@Whatsupkarren

JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | 23:38, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Let's try not to perpetuate stereotypes

I posted this in the Public library but it does apply for other library articles as well. I am concerned that folks are choosing the photos of Western libraries that represent the best libraries with the best high-tech, while choosing "quant" library photos from non-Western counties that are not their best libraries or most high-tech services but perpetuate the myth of backwardness. We can do better. Myotus (talk) 15:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

"Liberry" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Liberry has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 17 § Liberry until a consensus is reached. Jalen Barks (Woof) 12:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

What should be the relationship of this article with others?

Hello, Having just merged Library branch and Library system here, I was wondering what we should do with Library consortium and List of library consortia? I think the linking between the two articles is weak, so if nothing else, we should increase that. However, I think a better solution would be to, at the very least, merge the list into the library consortium article, and define better the inclusion criteria. Not sure. JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | 23:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Yes I agree the linking is weak, definitely any improvement of that would be great, merging wouldn't improve it too much. I don't see much value in the list of library consortia (but don't think it should be gone! perhaps it would be useful to someone googling for a list I dunno). Both articles are very USA dominant though, perhaps needs an overhaul of clearer copywriting, I would be interested in researching the landscape in Europe. Rhagfyr (talk) 17:58, 8 December 2024 (UTC)