Talk:Lipetsk

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

NLMK, the steel company's website, lists 70,000 employees on the front of its website. Is the 48,000 figure in the article (Section:Economy) representing just the employees who are resident in the Lipetsk area?--McTrixie 16:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Looking at NMLK's business structure, I think it makes sense to assume that they also employ people outside Lipetsk, so the 48K number might as well be correct. However, I was unable to find this number mentioned anywhere else. I suggest we remove it altogether as unreferenced, or replace it with the 70K figure that is referenced on the company's website (perhaps with a footnote stating that 70K is the number of all NMLK's employees, not just those in Lipetsk).—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
48K well match the number of NLMZ (former name of NLMK) emploees in soviet times. --jno 09:56, 29 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Yet another reason to remove this number.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 12:31, 29 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
To be honest, NLMZ/NLMK claimed 40K+ personnel (late 70s)... --jno 13:21, 29 September 2006 (UTC)Reply


Upgrade this page

edit

I lived in Lipetsk for nearly a year (2006-2007) and really love this city. I would be willing to go through whatever sources I can find and improve the English version of the page. I was thinking of just using the Russian version of the page as a reference and adding some of the more important sections that it has. What are Wikipedia's standards for such a project? Is it OK to do a partial translation for a city-page like this? Bill Lava (talk) 21:43, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

You are quite welcome to do so. You can't put down Russian Wikipedia as a source (i.e., you can't ref any statement with a link to ru_wiki), but translated content is nevertheless not a problem (and is quite welcome, as a matter of fact). It's just that such a translation will be considered unreferenced, unless you re-use any sources used by the Russian Wikipedia or add your own. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 13:35, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lipetsk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:53, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lipetsk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:04, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
HOME 1
Intern 7
languages 2
Note 2
os 3
web 5