Talk:Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy

Fair use rationale for Image:Merck Manual18 Book Cover.gif

Image:Merck Manual18 Book Cover.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:58, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Is merckmedicus part of the same family?

Is merckmedicus part of the same family? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocdncntx (talk • contribs) 20:19, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Edit Request

I’d like to request a few edits and updates to the Merck Manual of Diagnoses and Therapy page.

In the first paragraph, please update “the 19th Edition” to “the 20th Edition” In the first paragraph, please update “July 2011” to “April 2018”

Source: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2018/04/prweb15409101.htm

Next, I’d like to request an edit to Section 2: Content. This paragraph describes the Merck Manuals textbook but includes elements of the online version such as videos and clinical calculators, which may be confusing to readers. These descriptions should be separated for accuracy.

I recommend restructuring the paragraph starting “The Merck Manual is organized...” per the below:

The Merck Manual is organized, like many internal medicine textbooks, into organ systems (see List of Medical Topics below) which discuss each major diseases of that system, covering diagnosis (signs, symptoms, tests), prognosis and treatment. The 20th edition provides a comprehensive yet concise compendium of medical knowledge into about 3600 pages, organized into 24 sections, by emphasizing practical information of use to a practicing physician. The text is characterized by the combination of conciseness, completeness, and being up-to-date. It is updated continuously by an independent editorial board and over 300 peer reviewers that contribute to the textbook, which goes through an average of 10 revisions by both internal and external reviewers before publication. The internal editorial staff consists of 4 physician reviews, one executive editor and 4 non-medical lay editors. The 19th edition, which was published in 2011, was translated into 17 languages.

MerckManuals.com contains two versions of the site, tailored consumers and healthcare professionals. It is continually updated by the Manuals’ editorial board.

The Professional version includes thousands of practical medical reference articles, a drug interaction tool, a pill identifier, a “News and Commentary” section, videos on procedures and examination techniques, quizzes and case studies, clinical calculators, conversion tables and other resources. Source: www.merckmanuals.com/professional

The Consumer version includes thousands of medical reference articles written in simple, understandable terms, a searchable symptom library, first aid and emergency care information, drug interaction and identification tools, a “News and Commentary” section, quizzes and self-assessment tools, videos and other resources. Source: www.merckmanuals.com/home

In addition to the online version, the Merck Manual Professional Mobile App and Merck Manual Consumer Mobile App are available in both iOS and Android platforms. The apps contain the complete Merck Manuals library of reference articles on diseases, symptoms and treatments. Once the app is downloaded, this content is stored on the device and accessible without an internet connection. Source: https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/news/editorial/2016/08/30/19/50/app-announcement Mikewizmm (talk) 12:30, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Reply 06-SEP-2018

 Unable to review edit request

Your edit request could not be reviewed because it is unclear which references are connected to which claim statements in the text of your proposal. When proposing edit requests, it is important to highlight in the text which specific sources are doing the referencing for each claim. The point of an inline citation is to allow the reviewer and readers to check that the material is sourced; that point is lost if the citation's note number is not clearly placed. Note the example below:

N INCORRECT

The sun is pretty big, but the moon is not so big. The sun is also quite hot.

References

---

      1. Sjöblad, Tristan. The Sun. Academic Press, 2018, p. 1.
      2. Duvalier, Gabrielle. "Size of the Moon", Scientific American, 51(78):46.
      3. Uemura, Shū. The Sun's Heat. Academic Press, 2018, p. 2.

In the example above there are three references provided, but the claim statements do not indicate which reference applies where. Your edit request similarly does not specify where the references you have provided are to be placed. These links between material and their source references must be more clearly made, as shown in the next example below:

Y CORRECT

The sun is pretty big, but the moon is not so big. The sun is also quite hot.

References

---

In the example above, the links between the provided references and their claim statements are perfectly clear. Additionally, a disclosure has not been made on the COI editor's talk page nor on the article's talk page disclosing the nature of the editor's conflict of interest. In order to review your edit request, please do the following:

1. Reformulate your edit request so that it aligns more with the second example above
2. Ensure that the necessary disclosures have been made here on the article's talk page

Once these requirements have been met, please feel free to re-submit your edit request at your earliest convenience. Regards,  spintendo  00:55, 7 September 2018 (UTC)