Talk:Michelle Tea

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Michelle Tea PBS reading Dec 20, 2006

edit

Also available as a MP3 podcast from the SF area PBS site: http://www.kqed.org/arts/writersblock/episode.jsp?id=12787

Fair use rationale for Image:Michellteasmile.jpg

edit
 

Image:Michellteasmile.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Michelle Tea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:11, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Prostitute?

edit

Why is she categorized as a prostitute (in this article and in the Commons gallery)? The article only implies she writes about prostitution. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:37, 17 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Good question. I removed the category as I could find no evidence in the article's text our sourcing that this was an appropriate description. Safehaven86 (talk) 02:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
I agree. I was about to do the same. Meters (talk) 03:00, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Did a bit more digging, and turned up this SF Gate source. It says: "Novelist Michelle Tea wears her difficult past like one of her multicolored tattoos: It may have caused her pain, but now she can point to the rather dazzling results. The onetime prostitute and drug abuser smiles with the radiance of Miss America as she greets participants of her monthly Radar Reading series at San Francisco's Main Library." So it appears she's written about being a prostitute in her memoirs. But this source, and a discussion of her past as a prostitute, doesn't appear to be in the article yet. It doesn't make sense (or comply with WP:BLP) to have the category without the corroboration in the text. Safehaven86 (talk) 03:03, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
That would seem to be a reliable source, quoting the author herself, if anyone wants to add it. I'm not going to do it. Meters (talk) 03:11, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Out of date, needs a clean-up edit

edit

I fixed a couple issues and moved stuff around, but this entry could really use a more thorough edit. It's out of date (Tea now lives in Los Angeles; other than a brief cite there's no discussion of her newest book Black Wave and no mention of her work with the Feminist Press) and poorly organized. "Recent work" starts with an entry about something she did in 2003, over 15 years ago. "Academics" is pretty thin. There's nothing on her books, only "spoken word and magazine writing," and that section is pretty scattershot too.

It might make more sense to organize it as books, editorial/curatorial work (RADAR, Sister Spit tour and imprint, Amethyst Editions/Feminist Press imprint, MUTHA Magazine), and other work, including the XOJane column and the Valencia movie. Other ideas welcome, though. I am a small anonymous editor and I don't have time or spoons to do this right.2601:643:8005:8140:45F:A889:D763:3A98 (talk) 21:52, 18 April 2017 (UTC)LSReply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Michelle Tea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
Idea 1
idea 1
INTERN 5
Note 2
Project 29