Talk:Muhammad/images
 | Important notice:
This page is solely for constructive discussion of how best to integrate images in the Muhammad page, within Wikipedia talkpage guidelines. If you personally want to avoid seeing the images, you might want to read How to set your browser to not see images of Muhammad. Suggestions are expected to be informed by Wikipedia policies, especially Neutral Point of View and Verifiability. Wikipedia guidelines, in particular Wikipedia:No disclaimers in articles should be taken into account as well. Because of disruption, the Muhammad page is extended-confirmed-protected and can be edited only by established Wikipedia users. Please be polite and calm. Aggressive rhetoric either for or against the use of images will not be tolerated. |
 | Important notice: Prior discussion has determined that some pictures of Muhammad are allowed in the Muhammad article. Discussion of images should be posted here. Removal or addition of pictures without discussion will be reverted. The FAQ addresses some common points of argument, including the use of images and honorifics such as "peace be upon him". The FAQ represents prior consensus of editors here. If you are new to this article and have a question or suggestion for it, please read the FAQ first. For further information on Images Arbitration and Community consensus, see Arbitration remedy and appended Community discussion |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Portrait of Mohammed
editWhy isn't there any attempt to at least put a portrait of what Mohammed might have looked like? I know it's a hard topic for Muslims because they are forbidden to draw any imagery of the prophet or God but this is a neutral article right? RickyBlair668 (talk) 09:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Not sure what exactly you had in mind but the article currently has 8 pictures of Muhammad. Did you miss them? DeCausa (talk) 10:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- If you mean as a WP:LEADIMAGE, there has absolutely been attempts. A few short comments on that at Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Muhammad_images#Question_2:_What_image_should_appear_in_the_infobox?. Most depictors seem to have guessed that Muhammad had a beard. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:27, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Because calligraphic depictions of Muhammad are the most common and recognizable worldwide, the current consensus is to include a calligraphic depiction of Muhammad in the infobox. And all the portraits available today not depicts how he exactly look like. Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 17:00, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- I agree that the calligraphic representation should remain in the infobox. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- Also agree with current consensus. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:06, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Because calligraphic depictions of Muhammad are the most common and recognizable worldwide, the current consensus is to include a calligraphic depiction of Muhammad in the infobox. And all the portraits available today not depicts how he exactly look like. Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 17:00, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 July 2024
edit
Moved from Talk:Muhammad | This edit request to Muhammad has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Kuwait.5 (talk) 20:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC) I would like to change the picture
- Like it says slightly above, you need to much more specific. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:46, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Add pbuh after mohammed (S.A) name
editFAQ No. 5
|
|---|
|
Add pbuh after mohammed (S.A) name It disrespectful if we won't say pbuh or (S.A)..After taking his name.. 106.200.188.225 (talk) 22:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
|
Remove illustrations images
editFAQ No. 1
|
|---|
|
There shouldn’t be any illustrations images on this page. Can this be removed? Calligraphic images are okay. 2605:8D80:13B1:541F:91DC:8278:4AB3:7C70 (talk) 12:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
|
Showing FAQ 3 as a notice at the top of the main page.
editSo I stand with Wikipedia's neutrality, and understand that showing images is important in any encyclopedic biography, but rather than causing un-necessary topic creations on the talk pages by people who might not have looked at the FAQ, I suggest that we can show a similar notice to the one on this talk page on the main page, something along the lines of "This page contains depictions of Muhammad, and while such depictions are prohibited in Islam, Wikipedia has a neutral point of view, and if you are a Muslim who wants to hide these images, you can refer to FAQ3 on how to do so."
Also, for anyone talking about "if we do this similar notices should be added to other religions", I don't really mind, I just don't know of any others. I'm not even Muslim myself, I am just suggesting a proposal on how we could potentially mitigate this topic that is often brought up on this talk page, and I completely understand if you don't implement this, but I'm just bringing the idea to the board. Sleet827 (talk) 16:27, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Why does it need further mitigation? It would be raised even if there were warning plastered in every location... Alssa1 (talk) 18:08, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- We don't put disclaimers in articles, if that's what you're suggesting. See the guildelineWP:NODISCLAIMERS. The bottom of every page on Wikipedia already links to the general disclaimer, which in turn links to the content disclaimer: WP:DISC. Any disclaimer we would put in the Muhammad article would be redundant with the content disclaimer. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:23, 18 December 2024 (UTC)