Talk:NDTV
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the NDTV article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 28 days  |
 | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Peacock terms in lead
editRegarding the Template:Peacock, the lead currently includes, as just one example, this phrase: The company is considered to be a legacy brand that pioneered independent news broadcasting in India, and is credited for launching the first 24x7 news channel and the first lifestyle channel in the country.
This is loaded and ambiguous wording which implies importance without supporting that. It also includes claims which are not properly supported in the body of the article, which is poor practice per WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY. Who "considers" them this? How are they "pioneers"? Who "credited" them with this, and why is this credit so important that it belongs in the first paragraph? Please see WP:PEACOCK, WP:WEASEL, and WP:NOTSOAP. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 21:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- gone through the history a user by the name Tayi Arajakte added these infoBlackOrchidd (talk) 09:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
The last citadel of secularism is dowm
editNobody taking The wire seriously. ALt news founders hounded and jailed. Ravish Kumar left NDTV and turns YouTuber. NDTV becomes Godi media and relentlessly broadcasting Ram Mandir Pran Pratishtha. NDTV still reliable? BlackOrchidd (talk) 10:13, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- @BlackOrchidd The reliability WP:RS of a publication in the context of Wikipedia is determined at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. You might want to discuss it there. This talk page is to discuss about the content of the article. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 18:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I am taking this issue to WPRS NB. Plz participate. BlackOrchidd (talk) 06:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- + NDTV broadcasted Modi's Temple inaugration in Abu Dhabi without break on 14th Feb 2024. Meanwhile the protesting farmers suffered in perils at Shambhu border, NDTV didnt spared a moment of screen time during the temple inaugration. BlackOrchidd (talk) 07:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- + Finance miniter of BJP ruled government giving interview to NDTV after a long boycott by BJP leaders earlier. BlackOrchidd (talk) 07:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- + NDTV broadcasted Modi's Temple inaugration in Abu Dhabi without break on 14th Feb 2024. Meanwhile the protesting farmers suffered in perils at Shambhu border, NDTV didnt spared a moment of screen time during the temple inaugration. BlackOrchidd (talk) 07:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I am taking this issue to WPRS NB. Plz participate. BlackOrchidd (talk) 06:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Neutrality in Describing Adani Group's Acquisition and The Economist Citation
editHi everyone, I noticed that the current phrasing describes the Adani Group as 'noted for its affinity with the ruling BJP government' and references The Economist’s statement about the news channel’s editorial shift after the acquisition. To maintain neutrality, would it be better to rephrase this to focus on the factual aspects of the acquisition, with The Economist’s perspective on the editorial change presented as a cited observation rather than implying a specific relationship between Adani and the government? Additionally, should we include the resignations following the takeover as a separate point to ensure clarity? I’d love to hear your thoughts. I.Mahesh (talk) 11:55, 25 October 2024 (UTC)