A fact from Nagarakretagama appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 March 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more _target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Manipulation of history
editDear users,
Can we write history without manipulation? I see there is a manipulation in this map of Majapahit empire. Based on Nagarakretagama, which is a reference for the making of this map, the manuscript does not mention Sunda (Kalapa, Pakuan and Sunda Galuh) and Madudura at all as part of Majapahit. See also Kidung Sunda article in wikipedia! Kidung Sunda tells that Majapahit failed to annex Sunda.
Best regards, --Serayu 04:48, 29 September 2009 (UTC) (the lover of true history without manipulation)
Citations
editThe citations on this page are very difficult to follow. For instance the ref to Stutterheim: Acta Orientalia of 1938. There appear to be several different acta. The one in question here is probably Acta Orientalia Neerlandica but it's hard to tell because it's not online. In addition, I don't know if it's a typo, but that word Saktavism is completely unknown on the internet. I presume it's connected with the Saka people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.198.77.135 (talk) 13:00, 3 October 2014 (UTC)