Talk:Nano Nagle

The beginnings of Nano's mystery pea

It certainly is a mystery: would the author care to elaborate as to what this "pea" is please? Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fatqwerty (talk • contribs) 18:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

This was part of an editorial vandalism spree, soon reverted back to "Nano's ministry". —24.191.101.223 (talk) 06:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

nature of vote Irish woman of millenium in 2000?

Who voted in this? Who else was voted for? I can't seem to find any other details. Citation for it (currently number 10) no longer seems to link to a specific source, just the website of Studies, the Irish Jesuit quarterly. I've found a free preview of the first page of the 2009 article here: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25660652?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents but it just repeats the same without any further detail, I don't notice anything else in the full text. Presumably this was a different vote than the 'greatest ever' one in 2005 by a radio station separately cited in the article https://www.irishtimes.com/news/nano-nagle-wins-title-of-ireland-s-greatest-woman-1.460064 Neurohz (talk) 05:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Nano Nagle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.corkcathedral.ie/Religious20Orders/PresentationSisters/Presentation20Sisters20Nano20Nagle.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160727225909/http://www.domremy.catholic.edu.au/about-us/our-history/nano-nagle/ to http://www.domremy.catholic.edu.au/about-us/our-history/nano-nagle/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131015114420/http://www.presentationsistersunion.org/aboutus/default.cfm?loadref=114 to http://www.presentationsistersunion.org/aboutus/default.cfm?loadref=114
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130110003315/http://www.sistersofthepresentation.com/about-us/nano-nagle.php to http://sistersofthepresentation.com/about-us/nano-nagle.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131102172105/http://www.presentation-sisters.ie/content/view/92/117/ to http://www.presentation-sisters.ie/content/view/92/117/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130501082829/http://www.trinitylismore.nsw.edu.au/learn-more/about-trinity/history.html to http://www.trinitylismore.nsw.edu.au/learn-more/about-trinity/history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:28, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. —24.191.101.223 (talk) 09:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Just wanted to say thanks for cleaning up the copyright issues at Nano Nagle. I've taken care of revision-deleting the history, as the copyvio was quite extensive. If you're interested in this kind of thing, we could always use more help at CCI, whether you choose to make an account or stay as an IP. Have a good one! ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:57, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Glad to be helpful in a small way. What a huge mess can come from one careless editor! It might actually seem a little harsh to rev-del hundreds of good-faith Nano Nagle edits for copy-pastes that were all duly credited in footnotes though not in quotation marks – but I'll trust your judgment if you really think it's necessary. Thanks. —24.191.101.223 (talk) 10:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Ah, I hate to do it, but when it's so much content it unfortunately does need to be done. The simple lack of quotation marks and even the use of refs isn't unusual – most copyvios actually cite the source they borrowed from. It's just that without proper quoting, it looks like it's in Wikipedia's voice, so it has to go. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Fair enough. I'll probably move these messages of ours over to Talk:Nano Nagle, so other editors can understand what happened. —24.191.101.223 (talk) 23:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

If you want, but it's a fairly standard process and you've already placed the usual template on the talk page, so not sure if any more is needed. Either way :) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:56, 6 March 2021 (UTC)