 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re write
editPage needs a new title and needs to be updated and rewritten to include the consolidation of the other rates into the Naval Aircrewman (AW) rating. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.251.184.3 (talk) 18:54, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 19:14, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Aviation warfare systems operator → Naval aircrewman – According to the article section "Roots of the rate", the rate has been called "naval aircrewman" since 2008. Surely the article should sit at the current name of the rate, with aviation warfare systems operator a redrirect to naval aircrewman? I'm no expert on the Byzantine intricacies of the US Navy rating system, hence my request for consensus, but List of United States Navy ratings seems to confirm the need to move Shem (talk) 23:16, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
I was part of class 11-71 NAOCS Pensacola
editHow can I get a picture of the group that graduated With me? OjkJr (talk) 23:11, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Misleading
editThis article is misleading. It implies only AWs can earn Aircrew wings. This is far from true. PumpkinSky talk 03:20, 30 December 2017 (UTC)