Talk:Nossa Senhora da Graça incident
A fact from Nossa Senhora da Graça incident appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 August 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Extra source
editAs the incident happened in the area where the VOC captains where sailing it is prob mentioned here [1], VOC archive 1600-1800. The portugese archive contains similar captains letters and log books.06:44, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help. C. R. Boxer had made note of Dutch sources as well as Portuguese and Japanese ones, and had provided translations of those in the appendices of his works cited in the article. However, I don't feel comfortable citing the VOC logs directly since they are primary sources, and Wikipedia guidelines prefer we use secondary sources :) _dk (talk) 09:07, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nossa Senhora da Graça incident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://nautarch.tamu.edu/shiplab/Projects%20ir%20data-1610madredeus-1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:21, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Merge proposal
editThere's an October proposal to merge Red Seal ship incident to here; that seem reasonable, given that it is short, and most of it is context already provided within this broader article. Klbrain (talk) 20:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- To add as the nominator of the merge (since I didn't get around to explaining my rationale here on the talk page back then), the Red Seal ship incident article is, in my opinion, an unnecessary fork of this article. I don't believe we have enough content or sources to justify a split at this stage. _dk (talk) 15:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC)