Talk:Omkar Nath Koul

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Jammu and Kashmir Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir (assessed as Low-importance).

notable?

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I propose this is not notable. It still looks like a resume (and the subject wrote the initial article...), book titles lack bibliographical information, there are factual problems (none of the positions listed are government positions), and no substantial work has been done since it was tagged in May of 2008. Drmies (talk) 05:17, 12 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

From what I have read, and from his extensive publication list, the professor appears to meet items 1 and 6 in the criteria for WP:Notability (academics). For these reasons I have taken the {{Notability|date=May 2008}} tag off.
- idunno271828 (talk) 07:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Article rewritten

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Besides the usual copy edits, style edits, wikification, etc., I have added one reference, updated the book citations to have the correct style, and have gotten info about the books (mostly) from amazon.com.

I have also taken the {{Like-resume|date=March 2008}} and {{BLPunsourced|date=January 2009}} tags off. Although there is only one, primary, reference used in the article, many of the books have ISBNs listed, and most can readily be found on amazon.com (if not other vendors). (Yeah, I realize this reason is pretty subjective, but it seems reasonable to me.)
- idunno271828 (talk) 07:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic