This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism
Latest comment: 25 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The claims of Madja-as being linked to a polity in Sumatra called Pannai are ridiculous. This is original research, and we can see that by observing an old discussion in the Madja-as talk page, discussing how his edits are original research and did not come from a professional historian. We cannot do this in Wikipedia! Let us clarify why the claims are ridiculous: The editor first took the source from Isabelo de los Reyes' work 'Las islas Visayas en la epoca de la conquista' (1889). The book states that according to Francisco Colin, a Spanish missionary, that the people of Panay have their origins in northern Sumatra. But there are no claims of them being from a "militant state of Pannai". That is a load of.....can't swear. Here is the link for proof. Another source that was used was the 'Labor Evangélica' (1663) by Francisco Colin. This literally does not say anything about Sumatra and any of those claims, I've read the thing! Here's the work for anyone interested. Thank you for reading! Delirium333 (talk) 14:52, 1 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
