Talk:Pansexuality
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pansexuality article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 6 months  |
|
 | Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments, look in the archives, and review the FAQ before commenting. |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
 | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2022 and 13 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Felicityr00 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Darlynm2020.
Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Technoculture 320-03
edit This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2024 and 10 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CarissaM12 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Vyyyvu.
— Assignment last updated by Momlife5 (talk) 15:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Creating a media depictions section?
editI posted something similarly on Talk:Non-binary gender recently, as well, but here it goes. Some years ago, I got into a bit of a tiff with another user on here, and ended up removing the section, in early December 2022, after they flagged it for "original research." Whether I disagree with their assertion or not is immaterial. The fact is that I could have handled that tiff/dispute better back then. Despie I still believe there should be a section of this kind on this page. Additionally, I had also posted about this very topic, with a lively discussion from February to March 2021, involving participants such as @Crossroads, @-sche, and @SMargan with a range of opinions. However, I didn't add the section itself until December 2021. The section, when it existed, comprised only one sentence and noted Media portrayal of pansexuality as the main article:
Although pansexual characters are not often fictional characters, they have appeared in various films, TV series, literature, video games, graphic art, and webcomics, sometimes embodying certain tropes in cinema and fantasy.
I'd like to do something more this time, expand this sentence into a more robust section, and bring in some of the prominent examples from Media portrayal of pansexuality, perhaps resembling something like Asexuality#In media or Intersex#In society. It doesn't have to be something like the long sections on Lesbian#Media representation or Bisexuality#Media. What's your thoughts on this? Would you like to see a mock up of a possible section? Or is just linking to Media portrayal of pansexuality in the see also section enough? Update: I forgot to add my name here, oops.--Historyday01 (talk) 22:22, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 21 September 2024
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Joebiden64783 (talk) 14:59, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
I want to go into more detail
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. LakesideMinersCome Talk To Me! 15:11, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
The colors
editOn the article description it's written: pink, yellow and blue, when the "pink" is actually magenta. I'd kindly ask to edit this to match thr actual color, i do not permit the disrespect against the magenta color. UniversalNinja (talk) 14:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)