Talk:Pennsylvania Polka (song)

OR: "widely considered among the greatest comedy films ever made"

I see nothing in the cited reference that supports the claim that the film is widely considered (by whom?) to be among the greatest comedy films ever made. Also uses weasel words ("widely considered") imho. I propose this is Original Research and should be removed -- David Spalding (☎ ✉ ✍) 22:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Davidbspalding, instead of tagging this article, I suggest that you take a look at Groundhog Day (film)#Critical reassessment and select one or two of the dozens of references there that support the content that I added. To anyone familar with the massive numbers of reliable sources that have covered this film for decades, your assertion that this is "original research" or uses "weasel words" strikes me as ludicrous. Please reconsider. Cullen328 (talk) 01:20, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Per WP:NOTSOURCE other WP articles cannot be used as reliable sources. You are welcome to add citations to your addition, though I would remove the "widely regarded" clause, as that is specifically cited at WP:AWT as an example of phrases NOT TO USE. You can alter your addition to something like "is listed on several 'best of' lists as an all-time favorite" (followed by citations). You can of course reuse citations from the other page if they support your addition.

I've looked at the GroundHog Day reviews page and there are several citations (Empire, for example) that could be used here. 💡

It's not up to other editors to cite work to support YOUR statement. The tags are to alert others to correct the addition or remove it. I posted to your talk page as a courtesy so you could update it, don't be so offended.

-- David Spalding (☎ ✉ ✍) 21:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Requested move 20 December 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Merging discussion with Talk:Pennsylvania Polka#Requested move 20 December 2024. RMCD bot is complaining that "Pennsylvania Polka is requested for move in a conflicting RM discussion". Since everyone at the earlier RM supports this one, I'll simply combine the two. (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 03:59, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

---

Pennsylvania Polka (song) → Pennsylvania Polka – WP:PRIMARYTOPIC due to pageviews. See Talk:Pennsylvania Polka#Requested move 20 December 2024. Theparties (talk) 16:31, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

• Support, strike up the music. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:46, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support. 3:1 page view ratio is good enough, I would think. T. Cadwallader Phloog (talk) 20:25, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Pennsylvania Polka which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)