Talk:Psychoneuroendocrinology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neuroscience Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article too narrow

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Psychoneuroendocrinology is most certainly NOT "the clinical study of hormone fluctuations and their relationship to human behavior". It is "the study of hormone fluctuations and their relationship to behavior", both in human and non-human animals. Most research in this field is actually done with animals. And although there are obvious clinical applications of this field, it is not a medical specialty. Somebody should overhaul this article accordingly (no time myself)... --Randykitty (talk) 14:07, 7 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nearly useless article

Latest comment: 5 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The entire presentation does not correspond to the literature; and the examples are entirely dubious. This is not wikipedia-grade whatsoever. 2A01:CB16:64:AE30:0:15:9752:CD01 (talk) 12:06, 20 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic