Talk:Rafz train crash

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Operations task force.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This was kicked around at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains#Collision at Rafz so I thought I'd raise it here: is this crash notable? Thankfully there are no fatalities nor significant damage; if it was a signal passed at danger then that's not all that noteworthy. Compare 1990 Back Bay rail accident; no one was killed in that accident either, but it did considerable damage and had lasting effects on Amtrak's training regime. Mackensen (talk) 23:58, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I am not sure this is going to be worth keeping. The fact there was a somewhat similar accident two years before and that supposedly the safety equipment should have prevented this one is leading to a lot of discussion in Switzerland, so time will tell I guess. Possibly an AfD in a couple of weeks after we see whether coverage continues and issues continue to be broad? Yngvadottir (talk) 05:53, 21 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic