Talk:Razed in Black

Sources

The article lack sources - Google news should be able to provide enough to deal with these concerns (e.g. this from the Fort Worth Weekly, and this from the Honolulu Star-Bulletin). The allmusic bio, and reviews (e.g. this one) should also help.--Michig (talk) 14:13, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Merging Transmutator into this article

Transmutator does not seem to be notable on its own but any sourced content should be merged into this article. Thoughts? TheJazzDalek (talk) 16:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

I agree. One article for Razed in Black, Transmutator, and Romell Regulacion, should suffice - Razed in Black appears to be the most likely one to be searched for, so the other two would be useful redirects.--Michig (talk) 16:53, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

That works for me too --76.123.177.235 (talk) 18:49, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Since both RIB and Transmutator are pretty much just monikers for Romell, perhaps we should make his name the root article, and have Razed In Black and Transmutator both redirect there? --Zephyrxero (talk) 18:53, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Sounds ok to me.--Michig (talk) 18:58, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

I respectfully disagree. Per WP:NAME, the most notable name is supposed to be the article's location and, of the three names, Razed in Black is by far the most notable and most widely known. The article could easily be formatted to neatly include any sourced biographical information about Regulacion and any of his other-named projects. TheJazzDalek (talk) 19:15, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

I agree with TheJazzDalek. We should combine all three but keep the main one under Razed In BlackElementalrain —Preceding undated comment added 03:41, 4 May 2009 (UTC).