Talk:Safe sex
Latest comment: 2 years ago by PrimeBOT in topic Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Safe sex article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 45 days  |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Unprotected sex page were merged into Safe sex on 28 December 2007. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see Error: Invalid time. its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 July 2019 and 23 August 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lyjanicee, Huyha63, Sharonluong, Laurafansun. Peer reviewers: Blu65.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2020 and 10 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Heather98psu. Peer reviewers: Hbaranowski.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Foundations 2 2019 Group 2a
edit- Expand on the use of spermicide in condoms vs no spermicide in condoms
- Expand on the ineffectiveness of abstinence
Sharonluong (talk) 22:16, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
- PEER REVIEW
- Part 1 - The groups edits substantially improve the article and has satisfied the overall goals for improvement. Crystalnguyentan (talk) 20:56, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- Part 2 -
- a) the draft submission reflects a neutral point of view Blu65 (talk) 21:19, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- b) the points are verifiable with cited secondary sources that are freely available Crystalnguyentan (talk) 20:56, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- c) the edits are formatted consistent with Wikipedia's manual of style Rgonzalezrios (talk) 21:53, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- d) there is no evidence of plagiarism or copyright violation Yalda22 (talk) 16:29, 6 August 2019 (UTC)