Talk:Saint Nicholas (European folklore)

Latest comment: 10 months ago by 79.155.41.48 in topic Should be merged with the Santa Claus article

Untitled

edit

miért Mikulás bácsi ?????????????????? Mikulás —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.40.10.179 (talk) 00:17, 6 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

It is nonsense - why is this article here - this not original hungarian tradition and was not taken by Czechs from there. These pages are Czech. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blanicky (talkcontribs) 12:22, 18 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Should be merged with the Santa Claus article

edit

This article is not right the way it is. Mikulás is not "a similar figure to Santa Claus". Mikulás is Santa Claus' Hungarian name and all Hungarians consider him be the same figure. The difference is in the tradition. Mikulás brings the sweets for good kids at the night of 5th December. Originally it was at the dawn of 6th December, so kids would find the sweets when they wake up, but nowadays they usually do not wait until morning. (The 6th Dec. is also Saint Nicholas' date of death who is remembered by Christians on that day). At Christmas it is Baby Jesus who brings the presents in a figurative sense. The English article about Santa Claus also mentions Mikulás but stating him being a different figure. I think this article should be merged with the one about Santa Claus thus expanding those two sentences there. Maybe not simply merged as it would be too long, but in a condensed way. 46.107.38.168 (talk) 14:31, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

The two may be identified together in Hungary but are distinct figures celebrated at different dates elsewhere, so no that wouldn't be a good idea. 2A02:2788:11C4:9BF:A7AC:BB92:FFD:E43F (talk) 12:48, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, this article could and should be merged with the Santa Claus article. There are many reasons to merge this article with the Santa Claus article, specifically, there is a lot of WP:OVERLAP. Also much of this article duplicates what is already been discussed in the Santa Claus article and creates a WP:CFORK. What is not covered in the Santa Claus article and that is present here could easily make up a section within the Santa Claus article (Under the sections titled Predecessor figures Saint Nicholas and/or Traditions and rituals and/or alternatively as a new sub-section titled Saint Nicholas (European folklore)). There is also very little WP:CITE to support much of the content in this article. 79.155.41.48 (talk) 11:47, 27 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mikulás. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  NODES
eth 2
orte 2
see 3